Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Well, then talk to those who don't differentiate. Again, my statement was that metmom was appropriately turning the question on Gefter. And the only one who could answer the appropriateness of wondering about metmom's motives was you.

Okay. What's your motive for challenging me on that question, and overlooking what appears to be unsupported claims about the author's religious beliefs?

84 posted on 02/28/2009 1:47:10 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
Okay. What's your motive for challenging me on that question, and overlooking what appears to be unsupported claims about the author's religious beliefs?

I saw it as a senseless question. And I stated so, in so many words. I mentioned infinite regress. That possibility seems to have been validated by posts 77, 82 and 84. As to overlooking, I haven't read the post to which you refer. I haven't read each individual post in detail. But I did comment on such a position in my post 74. So you are absolutely mistaken on me overlooking that.

To your post 85 ---- Okay.

86 posted on 02/28/2009 3:41:10 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson