Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Takes Aim at Foreign Profits
Wall Street Journal ^ | February 26, 2009 | Martin Vaughan

Posted on 02/26/2009 2:36:19 PM PST by reaganaut1

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama has proposed a dramatic tax increase on the foreign profits of U.S. multinationals, in a 10-year budget blueprint released Thursday.

The tax increase on foreign income, taken together with proposals to crack down on offshore tax cheating, would swell federal coffers by an extra $25 billion a year in revenue by 2014, according to projections by White House budget officials.

The budget plan would also impose a $31.5 billion tax increase, over a 10-year period, on oil companies, by repealing various tax breaks now enjoyed by the sector. In addition to that, Mr. Obama would reinstate Superfund taxes, raising $17.2 billion over 10 years, much of which is accounted for by excise taxes on oil.

Those changes are part of a package that would raise taxes on business by $353.5 billion over the next 10 years, which could help fund other tax cuts or spending, or reduce the deficit.

"The budget also begins to restore a basic sense of fairness to the tax code, eliminating incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas and giving a generous package of tax cuts to 95% of working families," Mr. Obama said in his budget message.

...

The plan is short on detail regarding how Mr. Obama would roll back tax benefits for U.S. multinational firms. It also lumps in international tax reforms with unspecified proposals to shut down offshore tax evasion, raising a total of $210 billion over the next 10 years.

Marc Gerson, an attorney at Miller & Chevalier, said that taking away tax advantages now offered to U.S. multinational firms might harm those firms' ability to compete globally. "The current system allows them to effectively re-deploy foreign earnings, or competitively price contracts," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: bho2009; bho44; businesstaxes; corporateincometax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
The U.S. taxes corporate income earned anywhere in the world, but most countries tax only income earned within that country, thus putting U.S. firms at a disadvantage. Currently U.S. companies don't need to pay taxes on foreign profits until they are repatriated, and I think Obama wants to tax them immediately.

Punishing U.S. multinationals will simply encourage U.S. companies to shrink by selling foreign operations to foreign companies.

1 posted on 02/26/2009 2:36:19 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Didn’t Halliburton recently move their HQ to Dubai?


2 posted on 02/26/2009 2:39:09 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“impose a $31.5 billion tax increase, over a 10-year period, on oil companies’

And gas prices? Will the increase be blamed on the messiah?

Of course not. The obozo leg humpers in the media will blame the greedy oil companies.


3 posted on 02/26/2009 2:39:23 PM PST by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obama wants to run every last job out of the country.


4 posted on 02/26/2009 2:39:31 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
...thus putting U.S. firms at a disadvantage...

Karl Marx would call that a good thing.

5 posted on 02/26/2009 2:39:45 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Or reform as foreign corporations with a US division. Why do you think the company was DaimlerChrysler based in Germany instead of ChryslerDaimler based in Detroit? They didn't want to be a US corporation because of US tax laws.
6 posted on 02/26/2009 2:40:12 PM PST by KarlInOhio (On 9/11 Israel mourned with us while the Palestinians danced in the streets. Who should we support?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

This dude really is as crazy as I thought he was.


7 posted on 02/26/2009 2:40:13 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
WASHINGTON -- "President Barack Obama has proposed a dramatic tax increase on the foreign profits of U.S. multinationals"

Yep! And just watch the percentage decrease of U.S. multinationals in the USA as they headquarter overseas.

8 posted on 02/26/2009 2:42:00 PM PST by avacado (Bipartisanship is when Democrats and Republicans get together to rob the American people blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Does anyone realize how bad all these proposals are, like taxing oil companies in a recession and when he claims he wants “energy independence”? This is a massive joke - on us.


9 posted on 02/26/2009 2:42:56 PM PST by Williams (It's The Policies, Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

just another roadblock to recovery.


10 posted on 02/26/2009 2:44:33 PM PST by GeronL (Will bankrupting America lead to socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"Obama has proposed a dramatic tax increase on the foreign profits of U.S. multinationals"

Which will cause job losses in the countries where those companies have operations.

So let's not just destroy our own economy. Let's destroy the economies of other countries.

Trivia Question: Where will the next Pearl Harbor take place? How many megatons? Which country or country will drop the bombs?

11 posted on 02/26/2009 2:44:59 PM PST by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Crazy? No. A calculating, America-hating, Islam-loving Communist? Yes.


12 posted on 02/26/2009 2:45:31 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Williams; reaganaut1
Does anyone realize how bad all these proposals are, like taxing oil companies in a recession and when he claims he wants “energy independence”? This is a massive joke - on us.

But, but, but......"Amerrrrricans can dooo annnnnythinnnng!!!!!" /Jindal-singalong

13 posted on 02/26/2009 2:47:34 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Obama's father was a Kenyan communist economist.

Obama has always dreamt of being him.

He is pushing every communist program he can to turn the US into what his father would have approved of.

14 posted on 02/26/2009 2:48:40 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“President Barack Obama has proposed a dramatic tax increase on the foreign profits of U.S. multinationals,”....

The sinking of America brought to you by the three ring circus in the white house!


15 posted on 02/26/2009 2:50:33 PM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
[using wiki as my numbers source - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_the_United_States]

Bottom 50% of tax payers (138 million total based on 2007) is about 70 million taxpayers. The bottom 50% is defined as 30,000 or less so lets assume the average income is $25,000.
The bottom 50% pay only 3.3%. Lets assume we change the AMT so that all Americans must pay 8% (a 4.7% increase for the bottom 50%).

So lets do the math

70 million * 4.7 percent * $25,000 = $82.25 Billion
The per person tax increase would be about $22.60 per week

Normally, I oppose tax increases across the board. But I see such a move as normalizing the gross tax imbalance that is such a clear violation of the 14th Amendment. Hopefully, we could get to either the Flat or the Fair Tax.

Normally, I oppose tax increases. However,

16 posted on 02/26/2009 2:54:31 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Rush said that what Obama presented wasn’t a budget. It was a coup.


17 posted on 02/26/2009 2:56:33 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl

Um, that’s not likely. All they have to do is headquarter overseas instead. Then the US can’t collect on such taxes AND they then have every incentive to close their US offices.


18 posted on 02/26/2009 3:04:06 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
All they have to do is headquarter overseas instead. Then the US can’t collect on such taxes AND they then have every incentive to close their US offices.

You have to hand it to them for telling the truth. After all, they said they were "eliminating incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas." Sure enough, they eliminated any incentive to stay here. So the companies (and their customers) are better off shipping their headquarters jobs overseas.


19 posted on 02/26/2009 3:27:17 PM PST by Nick Danger (www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"eliminating incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas "

...by creating incentives for companies to move completely overseas.

These people are totally out of their minds with STUPID.

20 posted on 02/26/2009 3:29:47 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson