Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Queer eyes on what prize? Ending DADT [It wasn't about serving in the military after all]
Windy City Times ^ | 2-25-09 | Erica Meiners and Therese Quinn

Posted on 03/01/2009 10:36:34 AM PST by SJackson

So, we've heard that Barack Obama is going to repeal the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy that prohibits gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military. As two queer teachers that have been working hard to arrest the militarism of education in Chicago—a public high school for every branch of the military, and two for the army ( and not one of these with a Gay Straight Alliance for students ) , and over 10,000 youth from 6th to 12th grade participating in some form of military program in their public schools—we are not leaping with joy at this rumor. Our reluctance has our allies scratching their heads: “Isn't this what you want?”

“Equal right to fight!”

“What a success for the gay rights movement!”

“I guess this solves the discrimination problem in military public schools, then.”

“Gay kids can join up!”

Sure, we think uniforms are hot, but this—permitting out lesbians and gay men to enlist—was never the purpose of gay liberation, a movement aiming as tenaciously at peace as equal rights.

And for us, it's clear that overturning Don't Ask, Don't Tell ( DADT ) won't begin to address the public policy catastrophe of turning over our public schools, and some of our nation's poorest youth, to the military.

We argue that the system of public education should remain a civilian system. This statement rests on three proposals. First, adults may choose to enlist; youth cannot. Next, schools should educate students for the broadest possibilities and choices; the military narrowly aims to prepare recruits. And last, schools should protect young people and nurture peace; but the military is contagiously violent. From the ugly revelations of Abu Ghraib, and the rash of sexual assaults on military women by men in service, to many veterans' post-service violence turned both inward and outward—its legacy of brutality is so vast that the Department of Defense might more aptly be called the Department of Destruction.

This proposed repeal, far from any big win, offers queers an important opportunity to think about our strategies and goals. Let's not unfurl our victory banner too quickly; instead, we should keep our queer eyes, and organizing, focused on the real prize: social justice.

Yes, gays, lesbians and transgendered folks are discriminated against and excluded from full participation in our society and its institutions, including schools ( read any report about rates of violence against gay students or employment discrimination for out queer or non-gendering conforming school staff ) , military ( DADT—enough said? ) , families ( remember the 57% majority that passed the 2008 gay adoption ban in Arkansas ) and religion ( many religious colleges and universities ban homosexual students, staff, and faculty—legally! ) .

Add to this list the ease with which otherwise smart people, including President Obama, reserve marriage and all its attendant privileges for “one man and one woman” while also claiming they are “ferocious” defenders of gay rights—that's a fairly self-serving stance, isn't it? Yes, gays and lesbians still have a long way to go toward achieving...let's just call it “fully human status” in the United States.

The push to repeal DADT is, on the one hand, a no-brainer—all people should have all rights, right?

But this proposal can also be understood, and it is by us, as an attempt to remap what our social justice goals, as queers, should be—not the right to privacy and the right to public life, and certainly not the right to live lives free from our nation's ever-present militarism and never-ending war. Instead, lesbians, gays, transgendered and bisexuals are encouraged to forget our historical places at the helm of social justice thinking and labor ( to mention just a few, Jane Addams, Bayard Rustin, Barbara Jordan, and of course, Harvey Milk ) , constrict our vision and dreams, and just be happy for an opportunity to participate in a military that depends on poverty and permanent war to keep enlistment high.

Let's forget repealing DADT and cut right to the chase: Repeal the Department of Defense. What about establishing a Department of Peace, as Dennis Kucinich has already proposed? Let's pair that with bear brigades tossing pink batons ( and, of course, an annual teddy bear picnic ) . Or, we can take up the mermaid parade as an organizing celebration, with its dress-up and float creation. Either of these fanciful, and very queer, forms would allow us all to play and create together, and each seems a better activity for a school to take up that pretend soldiering.

Then let's organize for some real social justice goals.

For starters, let's demand universal healthcare, affordable housing, and meaningful living wage employment that supports flourishing, not merely subsisting, lives, for all.

We know we don't need 6th or 12th graders wearing military uniforms, marching with wooden guns on public school grounds. We don't need twelve year olds parsing military ranks or plotting battles. However, we could use more teens painting murals, stitching gowns, and writing code and lyrics. In short, we don't need child soldiers, but we could use more young artists.

A public school system that teaches peace and art, with fiercely equal opportunities for all students. We can see it now: painting classes, soccer clubs, computer gaming classes, drum-kits, comprehensive sexuality education, and musical theatre in every school. That's so excellently queer, and so very just.

Erica Meiners is an associate professor of education and women's studies at Northeastern Illinois University and a social-justice activist. Therese Quinn is an assistant professor of art education at the School the Art Institute of Chicago, and director of the Bachelor in Fine Arts with Emphasis in Art Education program.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhodod; dadt; dementalillness; dontaskdonttell; homosexualagenda; perversion; perverts; pervertsperversion; sodomites
I'm shocked! What's next, gay marriage really isn't about settling down and nurturing a family?
1 posted on 03/01/2009 10:36:34 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Let's forget repealing DADT and cut right to the chase: Repeal the Department of Defense. What about establishing a Department of Peace, as Dennis Kucinich has already proposed? Let's pair that with bear brigades tossing pink batons ( and, of course, an annual teddy bear picnic ) . Or, we can take up the mermaid parade as an organizing celebration, with its dress-up and float creation. Either of these fanciful, and very queer, forms would allow us all to play and create together, and each seems a better activity for a school to take up that pretend soldiering.

Let's ship these two over to Red China, where there's a vast shortage of women. Or to the Taliban-controlled areas of Afghanistan.

Then they can figure out what our military is defending against.

Cheers!

2 posted on 03/01/2009 10:39:17 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"One issue I want to clarify concerns President Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue” military policy. I believe that the Clinton compromise was a step in the right direction.
I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation’s military. That goal will only be reached when preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians is a mainstream concern, which is a goal we share.

Sincerly, Mitt Romney

3 posted on 03/01/2009 10:44:37 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
"What about establishing a Department of Peace...?"

I'm all for it....since peace means one guy has a bigger stick than the other guy. So let's make the name change....as long as the principle stays the same.

4 posted on 03/01/2009 10:46:03 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Despite all my rage, I am still just a rat in a cage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I couldn't get into the Army due to a preexisting medical condition, and I ended up in the "Arts." My son is as artistic as a concrete block, and ended up in the Army. Such as it is, the world is a far better place because of his work than anything I have ever done. That these two homosexual harpies are not laughed back into the farthest corner of America's closet is proof enough that I am a stranger in my own country.

Mr. niteowl77

5 posted on 03/01/2009 10:47:41 AM PST by niteowl77 (You wanted him, and now you have got him. I say, "Good day to you," America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"associate professor of education and women's studies at Northeastern Illinois University and a social-justice activist"

If anyone actually spoke this sentence to me, as a self descriptor, I'd laugh in their face.

6 posted on 03/01/2009 10:49:14 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Or, we can take up the mermaid parade as an organizing celebration, with its dress-up and float creation. Either of these fanciful, and very queer, forms would allow us all to play and create together, and each seems a better activity for a school to take up that pretend soldiering.

Can't disagree, I think all schools, public and private, should have a Mermaid Parade. Make mermaids, not war!


7 posted on 03/01/2009 10:49:14 AM PST by SJackson (a tax cut is non-targeted…no guarantee…they’re free to invest anywhere that they want, J Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
KOMICCAP In The Military: Why 'Out' Gays Will Be Snitches For The Left
8 posted on 03/01/2009 10:49:35 AM PST by an amused spectator (Obama: Beware of geeks bearing grifts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

I am all for eliminating the Dept of Defense. What we need in this crazy world is a Dept of Offense.


9 posted on 03/01/2009 10:52:02 AM PST by csmusaret (You can't spell Democrat without R-A-T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

Make it the War Department again. Downside, it will cost billions in new signage, stationary, etc.


10 posted on 03/01/2009 11:31:36 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

Yeah, I like the Department of Destruction idea except I would prefer that it be called the Department of Destruction and Obliteration.


11 posted on 03/01/2009 11:32:45 AM PST by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

I like Offense because it has more than one meaning. Not that I would want to offend anyone.


12 posted on 03/01/2009 11:32:57 AM PST by csmusaret (You can't spell Democrat without R-A-T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The “Leaders” on the left are now emboldened with the big O’s election. No more double talking or hiding the agenda. Now it's in your face 24 - 7.
13 posted on 03/01/2009 11:40:56 AM PST by JimC214
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
“Make it the War Department again. Downside, it will cost billions in new signage, stationary, etc.”

I am with you on this. It was from a more honest time before the feminization of America.

The little town I grew up near still had “War Department” in gold letters on a glassed in bulletin board display in the post office.

14 posted on 03/01/2009 12:11:03 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

“So let’s make the name change....as long as the principle stays the same.”

The principle is that we will be under the bootheel of enemies of freedom, whether foreign or domestic.


15 posted on 03/01/2009 12:30:22 PM PST by WOSG (tagline is now unemployed due to Obama economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BabaOreally; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com


16 posted on 03/01/2009 5:16:15 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (To hell with the RINO party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

We have fabulous pink pistols! Why oh why oh why can't we join the military?

17 posted on 03/01/2009 5:30:31 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (To hell with the RINO party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77

“That these two homosexual harpies are not laughed back into the farthest corner of America’s closet is proof enough that I am a stranger in my own country.”

If your “art” is writing then you’re doing pretty good.


18 posted on 03/01/2009 5:30:41 PM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson