Skip to comments.Hollister v Soetoro update 3/2/09
Posted on 03/02/2009 4:55:27 PM PST by rxsid
"ORDER ON MOTION OF PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE AND LAWRENCE J. JOYCE, ESQUIRE TO VACATE THIS COURTS ORDER OF FEBRUARY 4, 2009 HOLDING THEIR MOTION FOR ADMISSION pro hac vice IN ABEYANCE and GRANTING THEIR MOTION FOR ADMISSION pro hac vice" [snip]
Motion to Vacate
Can someone translate?
I believe a pro hac vice order is simply allowing an out of state lawyer to appear in the court in question.
> Can someone translate?
“Obambi is the president, but birthers still cannot let it go. Film at 11.”
You don’t have to, but it would be helpful if you would provide a summary of just what this really means please?
Obambi is the president, but Patriotic Americans still cannot let it go. Film at 11.
Birthers are anything but patriotic.
Thank you Tokyo Rose.
Does that judge have it in for them or what?!? What games are going on?!?!
Was I wrong in my reading that this is simply a judge's order allowing an out of state lawyer to appear in his court? It looked like a procedural ruling that was in favor of this continuing.
Really? Why? I thought it was all crap, but now I have this question, “Why would BO spend a million dollars to hide his birth certificate?” It makes no sense, unless he is hiding something, and now I am curious.
Objection to the Filing of Defendants Reply Memorandum
"Plaintiff Gregory S. Hollister objects to the filing of Defendants REPLY MEMORANDUM OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and VICE PRESIDENT JOSEPH BIDEN IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS. First of all, this honorable Court gave Plaintiff Hollister only two  days to respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss, a motion which in fact had already been mooted by Plaintiffs filing of his First Amended Complaint. By contrast, Defendants filed this Memorandum at issue here thirteen  days after Plaintiff Hollisters Brief and Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss was filed, when this Honorable Court had not even set any schedule for such a filing at all." [snip]
I was a skeptic myself once.
Good thing they had ESP to know they had been ordered!
Although Plaintiffs counsel has not been issued an ECF log-in or password, which would have emailed Counsel upon the filing of a document through the ECF system (due to Plaintiffs counsels motions for admission pro hac vice not yet being granted), Counsel learned of the Order in time to properly comply with the Order of this Court.And what the heck was going on here?!!?
The Order to Show Cause stated, Instead of the opposition plaintiff was ordered to file by 2/13/09 (or defendants' motion to dismiss would be granted as conceded, see [#10], what plaintiff filed was (a) the affidavit of a paralegal (who works in the office of a Pennsylvania lawyer who has not been admitted to practice in this Court), complaining about her treatment by an employee of the Clerk's Office, and (b) many blank pages, decorated only by what appear to be botanical drawings and the illegible photocopy of an Hawaiian certificate of live birth. (a) The affidavit was apparently intended as a response to my earlier observation that plaintiff's motion to file interpleader was frivolous, see [#2], [#10], the argument being, "Maureen Higgins made me do it." What was frivolous about the motion, however, was not the fact that it was filed, but the suggestion that (a) "duties" could be filed in the registry of this court. (b) The blank pages were either somebody's idea of a joke (in which case I don't get it) or a mistake. If the latter, plaintiffs have until 5:00 pm EST on 2/26/09 to correct it, by re-filing their points and authorities in opposition to the pending motion to dismiss (in the .pdf format required by the Court's CM/EDF system), or otherwise to show cause why that motion should not now be granted as conceded. It is SO ORDERED.Is someone in the Court playing games? Did they actually send this?
I hear numbers being thrown around for the amount being spent in defense, but no good primary sources. Anyone got them?
Read the pages beyond the first.
You are NASTY. If you can not answer the question then keep your hands off the key board!
I didn't believe this stuff either but the more he fights it the more I believe he is not a Natural born citizen, actually, according to the constitution he isn't even without his BC, he only has one US citizen parent.
Soon, soon someone will force this decision and then the only one who will look like fools are people like you.
Don't think that definitively exists in the public realm.
One can add up the number of lawyers filling documents on behalf of Barry in the various courts across American, then determine how much they customarily charge and come up with an estimate. Question remains, why go through so much effort to prevent a copy of the long form b.c. from being release (or his college records)?
Agreed, a lawyer probably.
Don’t care much for his attitude. In fact, I don’t care for it at all.
Cancel this thread.