Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Point one:

Newfoundland has never been economically self-sustaining since joining Confederation in 1949. It's been dependent on equalization payments from the federal government--as has every other province, except Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario.

Now it's making enough off oil revenues not to need these transfer payments, but the province still wants to suck off the federal teat.

Point two:

Newfoundland was its own independent nation (or to be pedantic, self-governing dominion within the Commonwealth) from 1907 to 1934, when it voluntarily returned to direct rule from Britain during the Depression because of economic collapse.

Point three:

Resentment towards the mainland always scores political points in Newfoundland. Thus the recent spectacle of the Tory premier of Newfoundland actively campaigning against the federal Tory government in the last election.

Point four:

I'se da b'y dat builds da boat

And I'se da b'y dat sails 'er

I'se da b'y dat catches da fish

An' takes 'em home to Lizer.

1 posted on 03/05/2009 3:58:19 AM PST by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Loyalist
Point one:

When Newfoundland joined confederation it did so with a surplus to the tune of 800 million dollars. The terms of union started with a plan that would see Newfoundland bleed this surplus dry in just 10 years. This is why Chesley Crosbie of the delegation sent to Ottawa to sign the terms of union refused to sign that document because he could not in good conscious agree to terms that would send Newfoundland spiraling into never ending deficits.

Point two:

Newfoundland was prior to its terms of Union with Canada an independent nation equal to all other nations in the commonwealth including Britain. Newfoundland did not give up this status under the Commission of Government which was appointed in 1933. The Commission of Government was still the responsible government of Newfoundland as an independent nation. This was not a government of Britain as many often mistake it was.

Point Three:

George Baker is one of the few Newfoundlanders that actually knows the history of this province and the resources that we have handed over to Canada since joining confederation. Newfoundland BY FAR contributes more to the federation then Canada does to Newfoundland when you consider the resources and riches Canada enjoys by having Newfoundland part of this federation.

Point Four

Well I kinda like yours so I'll end it here. Good for Mr. Baker standing up for this province, Mr. Harper dosn’t know what he is starting in that friendly province to the east! For they only stopped “because dead men can advance no further.”

2 posted on 03/05/2009 8:57:04 PM PST by thebignewf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson