Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich Eyes 2012 Run
Wall Street Journal ^

Posted on 03/06/2009 8:43:18 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Newt Gingrich Eyes 2012 Run

Susan Davis reports on politics.

Newt Gingrich is keeping an eye towards 2012, the former speaker of the House told reporters Thursday evening before a speaking engagement at Randolph Macon College.

Gingrich said he and his wife, Callista, “will look seriously and we’ll probably get our family totally engaged, including our two grandchildren, probably in January 2011, and we’ll look seriously at whether or not we think it’s necessary to do it,” he said, according to the Richmond Times Dispatch.

“And if we think it’s necessary we’ll probably do it. And if it isn’t necessary we probably won’t do it,” he said.

At the Feb. 28 annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., Gingrich garnered 10% in a straw poll of potential 2012 candidates. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won—for the third straight year—with 20%, followed by Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal with 14%, Texas Rep. Ron Paul, and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin—both of which received 13%.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anybodybutgingrich; deargodno; gingrichtruthfile; hasbeen; neverwas; ohdeargodno; rino; unelectable
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-91 next last
whatever........
1 posted on 03/06/2009 8:43:18 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

which party?


2 posted on 03/06/2009 8:43:56 AM PST by GeronL (Will bankrupting America lead to socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’ll pass.


3 posted on 03/06/2009 8:44:22 AM PST by A. Morgan (Every night I pray that Rezko and Blago roll over on Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Let’s take care of 2010 first.


4 posted on 03/06/2009 8:44:40 AM PST by mainerforglobalwarming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt is so yesteryear.


5 posted on 03/06/2009 8:44:47 AM PST by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

dear God no.


6 posted on 03/06/2009 8:44:57 AM PST by rintense (Go Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt is a JOKE.


7 posted on 03/06/2009 8:45:26 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense

Haven’t we suffered enough?


8 posted on 03/06/2009 8:46:06 AM PST by Maigret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Global warming advocate.

Clearly not a conservative, so I guess he is going to try and unseat Zero for the Democrat nomination.


9 posted on 03/06/2009 8:46:09 AM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan

PING! WEAK AND LATE!


10 posted on 03/06/2009 8:46:17 AM PST by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“And if we think it’s necessary we’ll probably do it.”

Which means if he runs, he’ll be another Fred Thompson. If Newt really doesn’t want the job, the competition will weed him out pretty fast.


11 posted on 03/06/2009 8:46:29 AM PST by JHBowden (Keep the Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Which Newt?

The conservative one, or the global warming one?

For amnesty ( a couple years ago) or against it?


12 posted on 03/06/2009 8:46:38 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No more retreads!

That includes Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney.

Go away for the good of the party and the good of the Nation!


13 posted on 03/06/2009 8:47:23 AM PST by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
No, no, no. Who's he going to select for his Veep, Pelosi?
14 posted on 03/06/2009 8:47:30 AM PST by 6323cd (Loyal Opposition My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Please, let’s limit the draft dodging adulterer candidates to the other party.


15 posted on 03/06/2009 8:48:41 AM PST by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Just what we need, another big-government Republican muddying the waters for 2012.


16 posted on 03/06/2009 8:48:45 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No. Please no.


17 posted on 03/06/2009 8:49:40 AM PST by Never on my watch (What part of Socialism works and what part of Capitalism doesn't?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Gingrich said he and his wife, Callista,

I wouldn't bother involving your wife for a couple years, Newt - you might have divorced her by then.

18 posted on 03/06/2009 8:49:50 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Let’s just hope the Pachyderm Party has sufficient memory to not go for the over-the-hill, squishy-moderate candidate again in the next round.


19 posted on 03/06/2009 8:52:11 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
And if we think it’s necessary we’ll probably do it

What, does he think the democrats are going to run Sarah Palin?

20 posted on 03/06/2009 8:53:44 AM PST by Syncro (Play by the rules and you're gonna miss all the fun--Jacky Don Tucker (Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Gawd, no.


21 posted on 03/06/2009 8:54:22 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("Praise and worship" is my alternate lifestyle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

f’gettaboutit.


22 posted on 03/06/2009 8:55:00 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Gingrich said he and his third wife, Callista,
Please newt go away....


23 posted on 03/06/2009 8:55:05 AM PST by JoanneSD (illegals represented without taxation.. Americans taxed without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Gingrich said he and his third wife, Callista,
Please newt go away....


24 posted on 03/06/2009 8:56:00 AM PST by JoanneSD (illegals represented without taxation.. Americans taxed without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

“Just what we need, another big-government Republican muddying the waters for 2012.”

Indeed. That’s really what happened with the last primary, wasn’t it?


25 posted on 03/06/2009 8:56:57 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newt floats this trial balloon every 3 months or so.

Don’t bother, Newt. You wouldn’t even get as many electoral votes as McCain did.


26 posted on 03/06/2009 8:57:05 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

Nah. He ain’t no global warming guy. He pays lip service. He isn’t in favor of an auctioned cap and trade or a carbon tax. He pays LIP SERVICE.


27 posted on 03/06/2009 8:57:09 AM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He would be entertaining in a debate, but the personal negatives and marital past make him an unlikely candidate. Then again, who would have predicted a President Obama? Or an Obama-McCain race in 2008.


28 posted on 03/06/2009 8:57:52 AM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No Newt is good News. Can we stop putting Methuselah at the top of the ticket?


29 posted on 03/06/2009 8:58:27 AM PST by Battle of Tours
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We do need an articulate, highly principled candidate who can explain our views with some force while being charming. I just don’t think Newt’s the man because of the charming part. But who will it be? I don’t see anyone out there.


30 posted on 03/06/2009 8:59:16 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The Green (new red) Party.


31 posted on 03/06/2009 8:59:52 AM PST by lormand (Harass a liberal at least once a day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan

Newt - you went astray on Gorebbel’s Warming. The jig is up for you.


32 posted on 03/06/2009 9:00:37 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
it's a sad state of affairs that we've only had one decent POTUS in the last 100 years...

and all we have gotten since RR are mostly retreads...

33 posted on 03/06/2009 9:01:33 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Newt you sat on the couch. It is now time to fade away.
34 posted on 03/06/2009 9:01:52 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (You want me to buy heavy metal? Metallica?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’d rather see John Bolton run. At least he’s got a pair.


35 posted on 03/06/2009 9:01:59 AM PST by RobertoinAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Is he going to get a speech coach to teach him how to formulate sentences without the word “fundamentally” in each and every one?


36 posted on 03/06/2009 9:03:06 AM PST by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Michelle Bachman/Sarah Palin?/Duncan Hunter/Tom McClintock/Tom Tancredo


37 posted on 03/06/2009 9:07:24 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoanneSD

“Gingrich said he and his third wife, Callista,”

One would think he’d shut up about his wives. Of course that’s Newt’s main problem, he can’t shut up.


38 posted on 03/06/2009 9:08:42 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
Please, let’s limit the draft dodging adulterer candidates to the other party.

Gingrich wouldn't be considered a draft dodger, he was already married by 1962, already had children by 1963 and had his Bachelors degree by 1965 and his PHD by 1971. Even in 1971 he was diagnosed by the draft board as having flat feet and nearsightedness. He isn't someone that was ever a part of the draft dodger efforts.

39 posted on 03/06/2009 9:08:46 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Open primaries next election?


40 posted on 03/06/2009 9:09:00 AM PST by maxter (Give today a chance. Enjoy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RobertoinAL
Thanks, I forgot to ad John Bolton to my list.

Michelle Bachman/Sarah Palin?/Duncan Hunter/Tom McClintock/Tom Tancredo/John Bolton

41 posted on 03/06/2009 9:09:29 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (FUBO, he says we should listen to our enemies, but not to Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Proof that narcissism is not the sole province of the Democrats....


42 posted on 03/06/2009 9:11:36 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxter

“Open primaries next election?”

That’s one I’m torn on. I lived in a state where the Dems closed out everyone but Dems. The R’s had open. They gained many voters for years that way. But this last election...with many Rino’s running didn’t turn out so well with everyone being able to pick the ‘R’ candidate.


43 posted on 03/06/2009 9:12:52 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

spare me. I think the issues are zipper control and blowing in the wind on most issues of the day.


44 posted on 03/06/2009 9:16:32 AM PST by sleepwalker (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
which party?

Global warming party

45 posted on 03/06/2009 9:17:49 AM PST by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Thanks but no thanks, Newt.

This party needs new blood, not recycled candidates.


46 posted on 03/06/2009 9:18:49 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Let the 2nd American Revolution begin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

I won’t vote for Gingrich, and don’t expect him to be the nominee. If he is the nominee, hey, the damage is done, I won’t be voting in 2012. Or at any time thereafter, because, as I said, the damage is done. And I don’t like saying that, but Gingrich has been and would be a disaster, and we don’t need to take credit for the Obama disaster — since the best case scenario would be, Gingrich would win the White House in 2012 and then be cornholed by all his good friends across the aisle in Congress.

Gingrich came up with a great winning strategy in 1994, then squandered its results, and IMO *knew* that he was doing just that. He’s one of those nice third-rail type politicians who will reinforce negative stereotypes against Pubbies and conservatives, and sell both categories down the river in his hunger for power.


47 posted on 03/06/2009 9:19:57 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Two words.....

NEW BLOOD.

All of these “Has Beens” including Mr. Newt are yesterdays news.


48 posted on 03/06/2009 9:20:17 AM PST by Rebel Wolf (Not pounding my guns into plowshares)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

lol


49 posted on 03/06/2009 9:35:05 AM PST by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

He’ll get my vote. He’s more conservative then you think he is. Yes, the Pelosi commercial was a bad idea, but at least he can go toe to toe during debates.


50 posted on 03/06/2009 9:35:20 AM PST by excalibur1701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson