Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Porn Producers Plead Guilty
Citizen Link ^ | 3-11-09 | Jennifer Mesko

Posted on 03/12/2009 3:13:09 AM PDT by GonzoII

A California couple pleaded guilty today to violating federal obscenity laws for making and distributing sexually explicit films that depicted rape and murder, The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported.

Robert Zicari, Janet Romano and their company, Extreme Associates, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Gary L. Lancaster to one count each of conspiracy to distribute obscene materials.

(Excerpt) Read more at citizenlink.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: courts; law; moralabsolutes; pornography
 Who is like unto God?
1 posted on 03/12/2009 3:13:10 AM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
We remain hopeful the legal push against obscene pornography will continue under Attorney General Eric Holder's watch.
What is that? Really? I'm laughing but it's not funny.
2 posted on 03/12/2009 3:20:19 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I believe that it’s pretty much impossible for a sane person to fathom the mind that finds murder fantasies sexually arousing. Of course, Hollywood has banked millions of dollars from producing movies that seem to imply I’m mistaken.


3 posted on 03/12/2009 3:35:18 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

“I believe that it’s pretty much impossible for a sane person to fathom the mind that finds murder fantasies sexually arousing.”

Totally agree, but those people don’t jump from Little House on the Prairie to these things. They start out with the soft stuff, with some people going a little bit more hard core and then a little bit more. Until finally one day they are buying this garbage.


4 posted on 03/12/2009 4:00:43 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
..."Violent and cruel sex acts perpetrated against women have no place in American society."

+++

The very worst violent and cruel sex act perpetrated against a woman is abortion.

Pray, pray, pray like a monk!

St. Michael the Archangel, pray for US!

5 posted on 03/12/2009 4:02:36 AM PDT by mlizzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

What a lovely couple. “Frontline” did a story on these two a few years back. One of their films (I believe the one that prompted the obscenity charge) featured the rape, beating and simulated murder of a pregnant woman. Of course, some academic might be able to make a case for the movie as a critique of sexism, violence, blah, blah, blah. The female star may be able to declare that, somehow, she found her role “empowering” and some kind of feminist statement. Janet Romano, while tacitly acknowledging in an interview that the kind of people who find her oeuvre entertaining are probably disturbed, then abruptly shrugged her shoulders and made the excuse that at the end of the movie, the two rapists/murderers/woman-beaters are lynched by an angry mob, and that made everything that went on before just hunky-dory. Good times. Pass the popcorn!


6 posted on 03/12/2009 4:03:01 AM PDT by Calico Cat (Some say that life is the thing; I prefer to read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

OMG...who could watch such things?
Makes me sick just hearing about the films.


7 posted on 03/12/2009 4:18:38 AM PDT by Bobalu (McCain has been proven to be the rino flop I always thought he was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

You’re wrong. You’re in the wrong thread.


8 posted on 03/12/2009 4:46:49 AM PDT by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mefistofelerevised

How is she/he wrong? Abortion is horrific. It literally kills one human being and maims the other.

Two victims in one.

No one underestimates the impact of rape. I fully support the Death Penalty for the rapist.

And I do agree with you that there should be no “competition” as to what is the most horrific thing. Both acts are horrific.

But..I just wanted to be clear that you were not implying that abortion was NOT a crime.

It is (in God’s law) and it will be soon (in Man’s Law)


9 posted on 03/12/2009 4:56:10 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Gee, I just saw an advertisement for a movie that depicts that sort of thing on TV. I believe that movie (which I'll be missing, thank you) is titled "The Last House on the Left," which seems to be a "revenge movie." While I don't know the details, it seems to be about a bunch of scum that rape a girl and escort her back to her house, where they try to take over, but a family member exacts revenge - "if the people who hurt your daughter were in your house, would you ever let them leave?"

This is an "R" rated movie. Why is this sort of trash allowed, but the other isn't?

Mark

10 posted on 03/12/2009 5:21:05 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

I am not sure if I want to watch the movie. It does not sound pleasant.

Unfortunately this sort of thing happens in our society. And the “persons” who do it are protected in large part by the ACLU.


11 posted on 03/12/2009 5:27:57 AM PDT by 2ndClassCitizen (NAACP=National Association Against Caucasian People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

I believe that the answer to your question is “context”. “Last House on the Left”—I’ve seen the original 1973 Wes Craven movie, unfortunately—was a horror film. A tasteless and bad one, certainly; and doubtless a certain percentage of its audience found its scenes of sexual violence arousing. Extreme Productions’ swill, however, is sold as pornography—literature or film intended specifically to arouse sexual lust. It’s the blatant marketing of rape, torture and murder as aphrodisiac that most people of conscience would find obscene and intolerable.


12 posted on 03/12/2009 5:39:15 AM PDT by Calico Cat (Some say that life is the thing; I prefer to read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
This country is ruled by mans law. One example I have is the local university wanted to open restaurant that served beer. This was 35 years ago. A local preacher, who claimed he “spoke with the authority of god” fought it. When it went to whatever state board that heard the complaint, his complaint was immediately thrown out, because religion could not be used for a reason to deny the permit. A religious persons view of abortion is not a reason to change laws. Separation of church and state you know. But I'm glad these scum bags who are selling this obscene porn are getting shut down. One down 50 million to go. But again this case has nothing to do with abortion, and I don't want or need a persons religious views making judgements for me.
13 posted on 03/12/2009 5:41:14 AM PDT by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
I heard about a gas station in Beverly Hills, CA. that needed to hire someone to pump gas...nobody in Beverly Hills pumps their own gas... but he had a difficult time finding anyone who'd take the job.

He was finally able to hire an unemployed porn movie star who'd never had any other job.

He had to fire him the first day he worked because every time he'd do a fill-up, he'd open the gas cap, put in the hose and when the tank was about half full, he'd pull it out and squirt gas all over the car.

14 posted on 03/12/2009 7:33:31 AM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

LOL - not only that, but he kept trying to put his hose in the trunk.


15 posted on 03/12/2009 7:38:31 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Let the 2nd American Revolution begin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Calico Cat
"Frontline" did a story on these two a few years back.

The show was on porn and obscenity prosecutions, in general, and you can still find the web site for it online (with transcript and video you can watch) here. If you want any proof of how demented these people can get and the problem with the idea that anything anyone "consents" to is OK, from the show's transcript:

LIZZIE BORDEN: She knows me. She's my best friend. I know she can take it. And at the end, I give her a hug. I take her out to dinner. We go shopping.

INTERVIEWER: Is she going to take a beating, a real beating?

LIZZIE BORDEN: Yeah. She's really going to get hit. She likes it. It's good. Sometimes, it makes you more horny when you're getting hit. It makes you more, like, wet. It makes you, you know, more tingly down in your genital area.

NARRATOR: Before the scene is finished, Lizzie's friend, Veronica, will be kicked and beaten. She will have oral, vaginal and anal sex with each of these actors. Then they will pretend to cut her throat and leave her for dead in a pool of blood.

LIZZIE BORDEN: I'm a female director, and it's easy for me to say, "Oh, come on, do it," you know, and not just a man. If a guy asks, they're, like, "Oh, he's a pervert." But if a woman asks, they do it.

NARRATOR: We were here because this is one of the places where porn is now regularly pushing the limits. But this was more than we bargained for. And while it appeared that what was happening was legally consensual, we left. The incident, though, caused us to wonder not just about the content but about the human cost, a cost that even porn producers see every day.


16 posted on 03/12/2009 9:56:10 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Calico Cat
If it's not clear, Janet Romano in that interview is "Lizzie Borden".
17 posted on 03/12/2009 9:57:43 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Calico Cat
I also doubt the performers in mainstream movies really get abused to the degree that the performers in more extreme forms of pornography do. What I find difficult to understand is why it's illegal to pay a man or woman to come to your home and have sex with you but apparently not illegal to pay a man or woman to come to your house and have sex with someone else while you film it. And if the boss in any other profession told their employees that if they didn't have sex on demand in front of others or they'd be fired and that sex was why they were hired, they'd be brought up on sexual harassment charges.
18 posted on 03/12/2009 10:02:52 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson