Skip to comments.Chief Justice Roberts accepts Obama 'eligibility' petition
Posted on 03/15/2009 10:17:14 PM PDT by RobinMasters
A California attorney lobbying the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of Barack Obama's qualifications to be president confronted the chief justice yesterday with legal briefs and a WND petition bearing names of over 325,000 people asking the court to rule on whether or not the sitting president fulfills the Constitution's "natural-born citizen" clause.
According to Orly Taitz, the attorney who confronted Chief Justice John Roberts at a lecture at the University of Idaho, the judge promised before the gathered crowd that he would, indeed, read and review the briefs and petition.
"I addressed him in front of 800 people in the audience," Taitz told WND, "including university officials, the president of the Idaho State Bar and the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Idaho, and in front of all them, [Roberts] promised to read my papers."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Please see that this misleading headline has been posted at least three times since Friday.
We are not even truly sure that he got it though we hope he has and that he will consider it though I find that doubtful.
After all, we're talking about 9 people who overturn the votes of millions all the time and don't even think twice about it.
As much as I would like to believe this, why is there no film?
Actually its more like 5 of the 9.
Film at 11:00!!! (grin)
Mark for tomorrow
I read on API that The film is on its way to Plains Radio via FedEx.
Renquist would have heard this case by now and brought it before the full court.
Notice the AP’s reporter’s use of the phrase “widely discredited theory”.
It has not been discredited. It has been challenged, attacked and smeared, but not discredited. It will only be discredited when the State Govt of Hawaii produces the original Birth Certificate, not a Certificate of Live Birth.
AP has good writers and a lot of leftist shits. You figure out which one this guy is.
When the vote is 5 - 4 we’re not talking about 5 votes, we’re talking of only ONE vote that determines what is Constitutional and what is not. Justice Kennedy is King of the US.
I live in what is locally called the “Quad Cities” area - Pullman WA, Moscow ID, Clarkston WA, and Lewiston ID.
U of I is centered in Moscow, and there has been not a whisper of anything of this sort happening. I am hoping someone responsible can and will come up with audio tape, videotape or some such to verify...
In the meanwhile, I know someone who works in the Academic Media Department at WSU in Pullman, WA. I will attempt to have them contact their counterpart at U of I to see if they have any direct knowledge.
I think it’s usually only 5 out of 9 justices who overturn our votes. I don’t think that all 9 usually agree on any one case.
Lincoln is no hero of the common man.
There was a post a couple of days ago written by Ortiz. Something about Robert's clerk sitting on a submission. Don't count on much from this.
is still selling T's, mugs, etc. Where does that money go I wonder?
is still selling T's, mugs, etc. Where does that money go I wonder?
I went to the site and this is what I found:
"We sincerely thank you for your support in electing President Obama. The official campaign store is now closed. Until further notice, registered store customers will continue to have access to their accounts, but no products will be available for purchase from the store. If you have any questions, please contact customer service at 1-866-501-4448. Thank you.
5 of 9 told me that “resistance is futile”.
One look at her and I knew that she was right.
Hope springs eternal for those of us who still revere and honor our Constitution, while others who prefer to just ‘move on’ and enable the Usurper-in-Chief, make with the jokes, sneers and labels directed at their fellow conservatives.
But we’ve seen such cowardice before. When the Germans marched into France, there were some French who welcomed their new Nazi overlords, just as we see some modern day American Quislings more than happy to just let the 0bamunists have their way, and have our Country.
It doesn’t take much to figure out who is who here on FR.
Does anyone here really have any confidence in this supreme court, the U.S. Senate or the U.S. Congress much less the magic negro?
Is Roberts so out of touch with reality that he and the rest of these black robed fools don’t have a clue about the question of obama lamma ding dongs birth place? Or is it they just don’t give a hoot?
“While audience members laughed......a waste of the court’s time......”
Well, gee. No doubt where the AP hack’s sympathies lie, is there?
But, of course, I wouldn’t expect truth, the Constitution, or basic fairness to mean SQUAT to an Obamanoid.
Where does that money go I wonder?
Public confrontation is what needs to be done with our elected officals on other issues as well.
Calling them and sending letter and emails does next to nothing. But raise an issue in front of cameras and recorders, that makes all big difference.
Obama’s days as our Preisdent are numbered. One of these cases will make it- they can’t ignore the law forever.
Articles from AP must be excerpted.
Audio clip of Orly confronting Roberts:
Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released
Certificate of Live Birth — Released — Counterfeit
Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Obama/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Soetoro adoption records — Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce — Released (by independent investigators)
Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released
Punahou School records — Not released
Selective Service Registration — Released — Counterfeit
Occidental College records — Not released
Passport (Pakistan) — Not released
Columbia College records — Not released
Columbia thesis — Not released
Harvard College records — Not released
Harvard Law Review articles — None (maybe 1, unsigned?)
Baptism certificate — None
Medical records — Not released
Illinois State Senate records — None
Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost
Law practice client list — Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles — None
Until Obongo unlocks this info, the will be NO peace.
Trolls, Obots- GET OVER IT.
It is a remarkably misleading headline .. should be pulled. Makes those who want simply to know if BHO is eligible to serve as POTUS look tin-foily.
I cannot get that link to open on INternet Explorer. Any suggestions?...
It opens for me. Try again
Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
Most likely causes:
You are not connected to the Internet.
The website is encountering problems.
There might be a typing error in the address.
This writer, this woman is a propagandist not a reporter.
Should be pulled down...the “Examiner” sheds discredit on itsself with this kind of “journalistic” drivel.
Thanks for this link!
This ‘drivel’ is the current hallmark of the fourth estate turned fifth column enemy of We The People. The media are socialist saps and now have their chosen Marxist in office, so they continue to spew their spittlegeist of deceit to empower their fraudulent affiramtive action poseur-in-chief.
I have sufficient reservations about zer0bama without the birth cert controversy, and I do not really consider myself a hardcore “birther”. Therefore, I am not counting on anything at all.
In this case I have the resources and the direct access to chase this down and either confirm, or deny the story outright.
I will report whatever I find out.
I included all 9 because at some point in time, even the alleged Conservatives engage in this behaviour, only not nearly as much as the people who think the Constitution is theirs to re-write. And we all know who they are...
The heading here says WND (World Net Daily) not Examiner. If this headline is what WND published, they seem to have jumped the proverbial shark.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.