Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Gunning for the Second Amendment
Canada Free Press ^ | March 18, 2009 | Selwyn Duke

Posted on 03/18/2009 6:34:45 AM PDT by Scanian

This will seem like a strange way to open a piece of commentary, but the gun owners who voted for Barack Obama believing he respected Second Amendment rights remind me of the bumbling Inspector Clouseau.

Specifically, I think of the scene from “The Return of the Pink Panther” in which Clouseau was getting a real dressing down from his superior, Chief Inspector Dreyfus. The issue was that Clouseau had naively stood by talking to a “blind” organ grinder outside a bank while the institution was being robbed. After Dreyfus pointed out that the organ grinder was the lookout for the thieves and Clouseau said that such a thing was impossible because the beggar was blind, Dreyfus asked how Clouseau knew this. Clouseau replied, “He told me so."



Quite frankly, this wasn’t nearly as stupid as believing that a member of Chicago’s socialist New Party, who was weaned in a black power church, was a gun caesar and not a gun seizer. And now Obama is in fact striking a blow against the Second Amendment. He isn’t doing anything obvious such as advocating a ban on semi-automatic rifles, however (not yet); rather, in typical Saul Alinsky “Rules for Radicals” style, he is attacking where his adversaries least expect. 

So what is the latest change you can believe in? Gordon Hutchinson reports at a blog called “The Shootist” that Obama has just disallowed the Department of Defense (DOD) from selling spent brass shell casings to manufacturers of ammunition for the civilian market. This means that these companies will now have to by new brass and produce their own shell casings, a much more expensive — and wasteful — proposition.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: ammo; banglist; guns; obama; secondammendment

1 posted on 03/18/2009 6:34:46 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian
...as he has said in the past, HE don't agree with somethings in the constitution, which sort of makes his Oath of office null and void
2 posted on 03/18/2009 6:38:08 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Μολὼν λαβέ

3 posted on 03/18/2009 6:40:06 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

At least this destroying brass directive seems to have been rescinded per Georgia Arms. You can read about it in this freep post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2208924/posts

One other thing to be concerned about is the department of interior no longer allowing lead bullets on federal lands because it “might” be poisonous. It’s ridiculous. If lead bullets had a negative impact on the environment I think Europe would have found out by now after the Napoleanic wars and two World Wars fought on the contintent. There’s enough spent lead out there to make every bird a lead bird.


4 posted on 03/18/2009 6:42:06 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

It may not do any good, but I am going to contact both Kay Bailey & John Cornyn here in Texas.

We cannot sit idly by while this man takes away our rights.

If there are no honorable Democrats in our govt, that is exactly what he will do.

He has 2 years to wipe out 2 centuries of liberties that our ancestors fought & died for.

Anyone else think they might contact their representatives?


5 posted on 03/18/2009 6:43:55 AM PDT by Former MSM Viewer ("We will hunt the terrorists in every dark corner of the earth. We will be relentless." W 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

His disagreement with the Constitution goes deep to the core concepts.

He believes that certain elites (himself, of course, included) have the moral and intellectual ability to shape society, have the duty to do so, and require the power to do so. This is why he laments that the Constitution doesn’t contain language about what the gov’t is required to do FOR you.

The founders, on the other side of the dichotomy of visions, knew that ALL men are limited, they are sinners, and are subject to the corruption of power. That’s why they set up a “negative rights” Constitution - what the government is NOT allowed to do TO you.


6 posted on 03/18/2009 6:46:12 AM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
0bama will make an anarchist out me yet.
7 posted on 03/18/2009 6:47:21 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Barter Now! (Starve our socialist government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

At least the third post today. The ruling has been RECINDED as has been reported each time this has been posted. Sales will continue to private firms.


8 posted on 03/18/2009 6:47:36 AM PDT by TexasRedeye (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

don’t fit the agenda


9 posted on 03/18/2009 6:50:58 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

“0bama will make an anarchist out me yet.”

The hippies have taken over, the revolution was successful. Time to start the counter-revolution and restore traditional American values.


10 posted on 03/18/2009 6:53:01 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I feel sick. It’s amazing how much damage this guy can do every day. I keep thinking of what Michelle said during the election about how her husband would never let Americans live the way we have for so long... I’m sorry I couldn’t find the exact quote though.


11 posted on 03/18/2009 6:53:34 AM PDT by AngieGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

The Revolutionary War began when the government decided to confiscate arms.


12 posted on 03/18/2009 6:57:10 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

Obama is just the messenger. His ability to create a cult following to help finalize the New World Order. Doing away with the second ammendment is just part of the plan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw


13 posted on 03/18/2009 7:01:45 AM PDT by trtdenver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay

It’s definitely the line in the sand.

The strategy on their side is to make that line as wide as possible, gradually and slowly crossing it so that we can’t make a “bright line” decision about when to resist.

They also see the quantities of hardware and ammo stacking up on our side.


14 posted on 03/18/2009 7:03:30 AM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
I'd rather have anarchy than kakistocracy, which is where we are headed.

What I'd most like for America is a return to limited Constitutional government, free enterprise, strong national defense, secure borders, low taxes, thoughtful patriotism, fundamental decency, individual responsibility, personal morality, religious freedom, community volunteerism, stable traditional families, and a common reverence for human life.

What would that take, short of a miracle?

15 posted on 03/18/2009 7:04:24 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trtdenver

Obama is not the New World Order, he is the One World Order.

New World Order

Washington
Jefferson
Lincoln
Teddy Roosevelt
Churchill
Truman
JFK

One World Order

Napoleon
Lenin
Stalin
Hitler
Mussolini
Mao
Teddy Kennedy
Obama

There is a difference.

The New world Order see men and nations as equals in all human rights

The One World Order see that all men and nations must be under one rule or one ruler.

It is the classic battle between good and evil.


16 posted on 03/18/2009 7:10:13 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
What I'd most like for America is a return to limited Constitutional government, free enterprise, strong national defense, secure borders, low taxes, thoughtful patriotism, fundamental decency, individual responsibility, personal morality, religious freedom, community volunteerism, stable traditional families, and a common reverence for human life.

What would that take, short of a miracle?

I'm with you 100%. As far as a miracle, I think our existence in the US was predicated on a series of miracles driven by the human desire for freedom. It can happen again.

17 posted on 03/18/2009 7:26:13 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Barter Now! (Starve our socialist government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68; andy58-in-nh

The only way back to your desired (and intended) mode of existance for the United States of America to split into its various and sovereign states,

then reforming the Union under the intent of the Constitution.


18 posted on 03/18/2009 7:28:45 AM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

He wants them, try coming and getting them. Bring lots of help.


19 posted on 03/18/2009 7:29:23 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Destruction of the US Economy: Obama's Global War on Prosperity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
I think our existence in the US was predicated on a series of miracles driven by the human desire for freedom. It can happen again.

I believe you are correct. But the Lord helps those who help themselves, if you understand what I mean.

20 posted on 03/18/2009 7:30:01 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I think you have an excellent analysis there, MrB.
Thank you!


21 posted on 03/18/2009 7:31:06 AM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MrB
It may yet come to that, but I would prefer to promote a 50-state freedom movement whose core understanding is that Socialism of the kind now being sought by the Administration and the Democrat Party is incompatible with the freedoms guaranteed under our Constitution.

Each state must decide whether, in effect, to "rejoin" the Union, or go their own way. And, as a corollary, I believe any attempt to remake the Constitution in an alternative (collectivist) image ought to be met with the resistance of those pledged to preserve, protect, and defend it. Isn't it odd how "radical" that sounds today? Fifty years ago, it would have been commonplace and unremarkable to suggest that our foundational documents have fixed meaning and value and that a common duty of citizenship is to help defend them. Today, I fear I sound like a bomb-thrower, and I am hardly that.

22 posted on 03/18/2009 7:41:55 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
I believe you are correct. But the Lord helps those who help themselves, if you understand what I mean.

I certainly do. And I believe that even the most dependent, yet able, people will support themselves when we refuse to.

23 posted on 03/18/2009 7:51:39 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Barter Now! (Starve our socialist government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Many studies have proven that a lead bullet leaches about 3” into the surrounding soil. Lead and lead oxide are NOT water soluble and are NOT a danger to the water supply.


24 posted on 03/18/2009 8:15:17 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“what the government is NOT allowed to do TO you.”

They were too high minded when they wrote the Bill of Rights. They should have put in about 40 more restrictions on government.


25 posted on 03/18/2009 8:16:49 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

They actually did that in reverse*, but the left has twisted the meaning. The left would twist ANY restrictions or wording, however, to suit their agenda.

*Reverse: By defining a specific set of things that the gov’t COULD do, and flat out stating (10th amendment) that they can’t do anything else.


26 posted on 03/18/2009 8:22:03 AM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

No sir not an anarchist, a person who wants to be left alone but have enough govt. to ensure that others who are not so inclined cannot violate your liberty without consequence is not by any means a anarchist . That person is a classic liberal (note the lower case l ) An anarchist is a fool who thinks that you have the right to do anything you want but not accept the consequences of your actions. Do not confuse the rabble you see in the various rent-a-mobs that claim to be anarchists with what real anarchy is.
It is just another name for the law of the jungle.


27 posted on 03/18/2009 12:02:16 PM PDT by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

his job is to uphold the constitution. so far he is going around shooting holes in it.


28 posted on 03/29/2009 9:15:32 PM PDT by television is just wrong (one bad ass mistake america!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson