Posted on 03/19/2009 3:00:45 AM PDT by Scanian
In his inauguration speech B.Ø. said, "We choose hope over fear", which signaled the commencement of the White House fearmongering campaign.
Yes, Mr. Greedy Irresponsible strkes again!
And yet the slobbering continues, Messiah, Messiah the minions shout. I wonder though, Do they get a tingle down their leg.?
Absolutely, unequivocally false! The art of rhetoric dictates that the rhetor spend as much time as necessary verbally or grammatically reviewing every option, its functionality to the overall plan, and the end results and consequences of every option.
If Obama is a master rhetorician, then he's HELL BENT on destroying this country, as he's already reviewed every scenario (copia) and knows the results. He is maliciously and knowingly destroying this country by imploding the pillars upon which this Republic was founded.
Besides, Obama isn't the rhetor, his speechwriters and policymakers are! Obama couldn't rhetorically argue his way out of a paper bag. When I was defending my Master's thesis, I was GRILLED by the board. I would LOVE to read Obama's college work, but oh, wait! They had his records sealed. Sorta like his birth certificate too, eh?
This man is dangerous, treasonous, and he is single-handedly allowing the global progressive movement to pull apart this country like the Jenga wood block game. The end result will not be pretty, FRiends.
This left-wing pox against our society is too big for any man to remedy, so, please Lord, strike them ALL down as soon as possible so that we may have our country, as the Founding Fathers intended, back again.
This disputes the 10 top points promoted by Zer0. MoveOn.org says it all.
http://www.freedomworks.org/publications/moveon-v-freedomworks-the-battle-of-the-budget
The problem with taking war expense into the regular budget is that it makes this money part of baseline spending - funds easily appropriated for other purposes. The dems have long claimed that the war money could be better spent elsewhere - on new entitlements that do not go away. In a sane world war funds would not be spent at all once the war ends. Other costs should grow independently on their own merits.
John
Did Senator Obama vote against the bailout in 2008? Why not?
He voted for it alright. Zer0 never saw a spending bill he didn’t love.
But, instead of taking responsibility, he continued, "We've got a big mess that we're having to clean up. Nobody here drafted those contracts. Nobody here was responsible for supervising AIG and allowing themselves to put the economy at risk by some of the outrageous behavior they are engaged in. We are responsible though, the buck stops with me."
Okay, so who is responsible for giving them $173 Billion of taxpayers money?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.