Skip to comments.House passes bill taxing AIG and other bonuses (HR 1586: Tax 90% over $250,000)
Posted on 03/19/2009 12:10:57 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
Acting with lightning speed, the Democratic-led House has approved a bill to slap punishing taxes on big employee bonuses from firms bailed out by taxpayers.
The vote was 328-93.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
This is extremely dangerous ground, and a large number of Republicans voted for it.
No surprise there. A large number of Republicans are RINOS.
Too bad, there’s such a groundswell of anger against these bonuses, to vote against would be very damaging. I’m sure the pressure is on.
This is horrifying! The game continues with these clowns. Everyone MUST remember to attend a “Tea Party” nearest you on April 15!!!
This bailout BS is just getting deeper and deeper.
Bad facts make bad law.
Sure, we don’t love the bonuses, but this law is chilling.
Most people owned their mistakes. YOU OWN this Democrats and Specter.
Before anyone cheers this, just consider WHO IS NEXT.
God help them, they know not what they do.
How long before that 90% tax gets applied to ANY bonus the Obama-bots deem to “large”?
I’ve posted this elsewhere but if the shoe fits...
And I quote...
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
A bill of attainder (also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial. Bills of attainder are forbidden by Article I, section 9, clause 3 of the United States Constitution.
This is unConstitutional. Actually, it’s slapping the Founding Fathers upside the head. There is nothing American with what they are doing. Congress caused this mess, and instead of being held accountable, they usurp the Constitution to cover their butts.
What?!? They know EXACTLY what they do!
Just Socialistic bread and circuses with this being the circus.
No way will this hold up in the courts but it gives the socialists/democrats some cover with the more gullible public for awhile.
The government gave the money away without knowing what would be done with it or being able to set limits on use. That is THEIR fault not AIG’s
Problem is...these people did not commit a crime.
The problem is this:
People are angry about the bonuses, especially when they are given to people in the same division of the company that was responsible for the problems. I personally think it’s not a great idea for these people to be getting bonuses.
I get the distinct impression many people are confusing “I don’t think these guys should be getting bonuses” with “I think our Marxist representatives should pass an illegal ex post facto law to punish private citizens with confiscatory taxes.” Elmer Fudgepacker even was blathering about wanting names and threatening to subpoena. Great, let’s put these people in personal danger. These people are a grave danger to the country. Is nobody standing up for this? There had to be like 100 Republicans who voted for this.
...or, before the tax gets applied to any industry that the majority doesn't agree with?
Our government has overstepped its bounds BIG TIME here.
It’s not the beginning of the end. That happened on November 4th, 2008. This just greases the chute.
Blood in the street by year’s end. Mark my words.
Instead of this law they should pass one that prohibits Companies that receive TARP or other bailout money from giving political campaign contributions. Tax payer money should not be laundered through insolvent companies and then given to politicians.
Or just ANY bonus?
The more Democrats lash out, the more they are obviously guilty of the crime they are pretending to fight against.
According to Sherman today in the debate...next week.
Bonuses, commissions, even employee of the week rewards...
Really, he said they needed to come back and revisit all these types of compensation next week. Because people would find some other way around congress to reward people.
Before anyone cheers this, just consider WHO IS NEXT.
God help them, they know not what they do.
1. It is not God that has a hand in this.
2. They (government) know exactly what they are doing and that is the scariest part....
There is no crime alleged.
They atart big then go after any bonus, for any slave in their path/view
Now we have punishment taxes.
Furthermore republicans should be against this legislation because it is attempting to make future bailouts palatable to the people. Republicans should be drafting legislation making it illegal for the government to lend money directly to any company.
The RINOS are probably reacting to those cry babies who call radio and tv talk shows and whine about “the rich” and how they are “hurting the little guy”. These whiners are the front lines in the class war.
That is a fear of mine, for personal reasons. My husband's company allows certain individuals in the company to get "bonus" checks four times a year.
In order to be part of that program, my hubby agreed to have his base salary reduced. Then he gets the bonus checks which are directly tied to the company profits. (Our last check was a little lower than past ones, due to the economy.) We have not seen a raise in his base pay since he signed up for that program, which has been years.
I am beginning to fear that the politicians (and then the public after the media gets them worked up) will begin equating all bonus programs with something evil --- and then hubby and I are screwed.
Some of these things the politicians have been saying about these people who got the bonuses have been simply outrageous. Then, the stuff that was being sent to AIG by the general public was frightening.
Something ugly is brewing out in the land, and the politicians would be wise to begin toning down their rhetoric, and fast.
This is wrong. It is meant to demonize the so-called “rich”. GDP will suffer as productivity will decrease as incentives for higher pay make it almost not worth working harder as pay will be taxed disproportionately. The executives at AIG and other companies (I hope that it also applies to Fannie and Freddie but somehow expect they are not included here with loopholes written into the bill) were paid to stick with the company in “retention” payments not incentive bonuses.
Guess what is going to happen now that this bill has passed? Those folks who have fought hard to keep AIG running somewhat smoothly in difficult times will pick up and go, quickly, leaving AIG in peril even more.
Republicans were stating they had legislation drafted to take back 100% of the bonus money. Be careful here on what you expect them to do.
I fear the camel's nose is under the tent. We will now have bureaucrats or congressmen determining how much we can earn based on their idea of how much we "need".
It’s very unsettling that the Constitution means nothing to 328/465 members of Congress.
A legislator that would use the law as a method of tyranny is a legislator that needs to be removed from office.
I’m sad to say that I now know how my founding fathers felt when they gathered to discuss what must be done to end the abuse of an all-powerful and deaf government.
The level of rising alarm in the back of my head keeps saying the same thing: When does talk lead to action and just how bold must that action be?
Are you certain this is true? I believe I heard, either last night or this a.m., that the people getting the bonuses were not the people who caused the meltdown at AIG. Those people are gone.
... and given that Article I Setion 9 Clause 3 states:
No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
every one of them that voted "aye" should be impeached.
I predict that, ironically, the largely useless entertainment industry will be the only type of wealthy folk protected from the DUmmies socialist revolution. Oh yeah—that and rich Dems who don’t pay their taxes anyway.
I agree with your statement about why people are mad, but people are mistaken to call these payments "bonuses".
AIG went to these specialist/executives/employees to get them to stay and try and reduce AIG's $2.6 TRILLION exposure on these derivative's insurance contracts. The employee did that. They reduced the exposure by $1.1 TRILLION dollars. AIG (with the approval of the NY Federal Reserve Bank, under the leadership of Tim Geitner) promised these employees X amount of dollars if they stayed and did what they were asked. These are legitimate payments on legitimate contracts. Period.
This law is IMHO unquestionably unconstitutional. We'll see if anyone sues - I'm guessing not because who wants to out themselves as a recipient of these bonuses and face the public backlash. Sadly, that very well may cement this precedent and allow the DEMS to target other companies or industries they disagree with - Can you hear me OIL EXECUTIVE, PHARMACEUTICAL EXECUTIVES, INSURANCE EXECUTIVES, GUN MANUFACTURES ETC. ETC. ETC???
They are covering the other blunders as well, like the billions given overseas. They are mum on that, hoping we don't notice. This is setting a precedent to go in and break private contracts, no matter if it's a corporation or an individual, like you and me.
Why not? The politicians are already using AIG to launder bail-out money (taxpayer provided) which is then funneled to foreign banks. Yes, we are bailing out the world.
I believe the "outrage" the politicians are expressing is due, in no small part, to them wanting to keep the American public from learning that we are sending taxpayer dollars to bail out foreign banks.
Or just any amount over $250,000 per year?
And that won’t be the end, either.
“How long before that 90% tax gets applied to ANY bonus the Obama-bots deem to large?”
Or salary? Or inheritance? Or gift?
boy, this has got to be the best reason for hiding your assets
Next DC idea by libs?
“Tax Rush Limbaugh for the windfall of lies he tells about our new loved president. How dare he want P Obama to fail? How about a 90% tax of radio talk show hosts that make over a certain $$$ and have over so many stations. He is profiting on Obama’s misfortunes”
This is clearly within the enumerated powers in the Constitution, where? This is only the first of the enemy’s lists. Back in the USSA
Liberals vote in lock step. Conservatives split their votes because we haven’t had areal conservative run in a w3hile. Notice I didn’t use the word “repoblican”. That’s completely different from “conservative”.
I don’t think they do.
They came after the jews and I did nothing. They came after the Blacks and I did nothing. They came after and there was no one left to protect me.
+++ ++++++++ +++++ ++++++ ++++
This is unconstitutional. I’m not a fan of bail out companies giving bonuses but we MUST MUST MUST defend our consititution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.