Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s Time for Jon Stewart to Stop Hurting America
Pajamas Media ^ | March 19,2009 | Adam Graham

Posted on 03/20/2009 8:03:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: SeekAndFind
"Putting clips together to make a point or a joke doesn’t give an accurate impression of reality. Unlike The Onion or Saturday Night Live’s obviously satirical “Weekend Update,” Stewart gives the impression that he is making fun of what has actually happened rather than embellishing reality to create humor or outrage."

BINGO!

21 posted on 03/20/2009 2:39:51 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Mornie` utulie`. Mornie` alantie`.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

His show was funny for about the first month when he went after left and right equally. Then he swerved off the road and went into the ditch pretty quick. haven’t watched in quite a long time. Even Micheal Moore is funnier and more entertaining.


22 posted on 03/20/2009 3:04:31 PM PDT by PsyOp (Put government in charge of tire pressure, and we'll soon have a shortage of air. - PsyOp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeharleyguy
These tidbits, plus Cramer’s attempts to logically explain the whys and hows of financial network reporting, didn’t make it on the show..."

Well, Stewart was right about one thing, when he said that promising 30% gains every year was like an infomercial with no base in reality. And that is true. Over a, say, 20 year period 6-10% per year is great.

What Cramer was trying to convey is the idea that within a bubble, insane behaviour can be sane. If you invest at the start of the bubble, quadruple your investment and get out, that IS economically sane behaviour as it maximizes your profits (of course, if you get in shortly before the bubble is about to burst, that's a whole different story).

No bubble will ever undo fundamentals, namely that there is no such thing as a free lunch. The problem was that everybody was behaving insane. The interest rate policies of the last half dozen years was insane. The housing bubble was insane. Of course it's no big feat to point out the insanity afterwards as e.g. Stewart does. But those who did it before like e.g. Ron Paul were also ridiculed, because everyone was in on it and thought the party would never stop and who likes a party-pooper?

In short:

1. The market wins. Always.
2. There is no such thing as a free lunch.
3. Profits / gains must be based on the real economy (e.g. technological innovation and / or better productivity).
23 posted on 03/21/2009 6:30:58 AM PDT by wolf78 (Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson