Posted on 03/20/2009 3:03:55 PM PDT by Thorin
As the U.S. financial crisis broadens and deepens, wiping out the wealth and savings of tens of millions, destroying hopes and dreams, it is hard not to see in all of this historys verdict upon this generation.
We have been weighed in the balance and found wanting.
For how did this befall us, save through decisions that brushed aside lessons that history and experience had taught our fathers?
It all began with the corruption called sub-prime mortgages.
The motivation was not wicked. Democrats wanted to raise home ownership among African-Americans from 50 percent to the 75 percent of white folks. Rove Republicans wanted to do the same for Hispanics.
Banks were morally pressured by politicians into making home loans to folks who could not remotely qualify under standards set by decades of experience with mortgage defaults.
Made by the millions, these loans were sold in vast quantities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. There they were packaged, converted into mortgage-backed securities and sold to the big banks. The banks put scores of billions of dollars worth on their books and sold the rest to foreign banks anxious to acquire Triple-A securities, backed by real estate in Americas ever-booming housing market.
Computer whizzes devised exotic instrumentsderivatives, which could soar in value, making instant multimillionaires, but also plummet, based on rises and dips in the underlying value of the paper.
Came now young geniuses at AIG to insure the banks against catastrophic losses, should the U.S. housing market crash. As the risk was minuscule, premiums were tiny. Payouts, however, should it come to that, were beyond AIGs capacity.
In AIGs Financial Products division, based in Connecticut and London, brainiacs were creating other exotic instruments, such as credit default swaps to guarantee against losses and insure profits. To keep these wunderkinds at AIG, they were promised million-dollar retention bonuses.
Who kept the game going?
The Federal Reserve, by keeping interest rates low and money gushing into the economy, created the bubble that saw housing prices rise annually at 10, 15 and 20 percent.
As the economy grew, however, the Fed began to tighten, to raise interest rates. Mortgage terms became tougher. Housing prices stabilized. Homeowners with sub-prime mortgages now found they had to start paying down principal. People losing jobs began to walk away from their houses.
Belatedly, folks awoke to the reality that housing prices could go south as well as north, and all that paper spread all over the world was overvalued, and a good bit of it might be worthless.
And, so, the crash came and the panic ensued.
Who is to blame for the disaster that has befallen us?
Their name is legion.
There are the politicians who bullied banks into making loans the banks knew were bad to begin with and would never have made without threats or the promise of political favors.
There is that den of thieves at Fannie and Freddie who massaged the politicians with campaign contributions and walked away from the wreckage with tens of millions in salaries and bonuses.
There are the idiot bankers who bought up securities backed by sub-prime mortgages and were too indolent to inspect the rotten paper on their books. There are the ratings agencies, like Moodys and Standard & Poors, who gazed at the paper and declared it to be Grade A prime.
In short, this generation of political and financial elites has proven itself unfit to govern a great nation. What we have is a system failure that is rooted in a societal failure. Behind our disaster lie the greed, stupidity and incompetence of the leadership of a generation.
Does Dr. Obama have the cure for the sickness that ails the republic?
He is going to borrow and spend trillions more to bring back the good old days, though it was the good old days that brought us to the edge of the abyss into which we have fallen. Then he is going to spend new trillions to give us benefits we do not now have, though the national debt is surging to 100 percent of the Gross National Product, and may reach there by 2011.
Is Obama willing to speak hard truths?
Is he willing to say that home ownership is for those with sound credit and solid jobs? Is he willing to say that credit, whether for auto loans, or student loans, or consumer purchases, should be restricted to those who have shown the maturity to manage debtand no others need apply?
Avarice, ambition, warned John Adams, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution is made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
In this deepening crisis, what is being tested is not simply the resilience of capitalism, but the character of a people.
I posted this one, but didn’t get any replies. Maybe you will.
Indeed. An excellent read. If you can keep your blood pressure in check.
Pat pretty much nails it with this one, but his reputation on FR hasn’t been the greatest because of some of his wilder statements.
Also, its a bit like “preaching to the choir” to post it here. Most of us will read it, and say “well, duh...”
It’s not exactly rocket science.
ACORN kept obama busy suing Citibank. Back in September of last year a CNN reporter did a story as to who’s to blame for the financial mess, I thought I’d be hearing about Clinton and the CRA bill, not a peep, no mention of Barney Frank, either. The report was all about President Bush and the economic team saying months earlier that the economy was fundamentally sound.
IMHO, the narcissism of the Baby Boomers created this mess....
It began, before sub-prime mortgages, with the worship of home ownership and the deification of the home mortgage interest tax deduction to subsidize home ownership.
This country was over-housed long before sub-prime mortgages. By this I mean that people (helped by the government) were spending far more on houses than they would have without the subsidy, resulting in misallocation of resources, higher energy costs, and perhaps even suburban sprawl. If Americans had been investing in real productive capacity rather than “investing” (really consuming) in real estate, we’d be way better off.
Which way did Mr. Galt go?
The maniacs running the country should of let it all go bankrupt. If they won’t we should all file chapter 7 and give em back all the Chinese Junk we bought on credit.
Put less gently, financial institutions were coerced into doling out cash on the basis of race.
An excellent analysis of the moral corruption that led to the financial crisis.
Although it was certainly a contributing factor, blaming the entire mess on under-qualified minorities ignores the fact that, during the Housing Bubble Mania, people with steady average jobs were paying $400,000 for $200,000 houses and people with high paying jobs were paying $800,000 for $400,000 houses.
Look back over the old "Is there a Housing Bubble" threads on FR and you will see the Bubble Mania in full bloom. Those who warned against the Bubble Mania were accused of being "Democrats trying to talk down the economy".
And, during the Bubble Mania, "lenders" threw money at them in the form of highly risky mortgages that were obviously ticking time-bombs.
.
Why would a "lender" endanger his money so irresponsibly?
I explained in another post in another thread:
************
How the Toxic Mortgage Scam worked:
1. After the Dot.com Bubble burst, investors, not satisfied with slow stock market gains and not satisfied with low interest rates wanted higher returns on their investments.
2. Mortgage Backed Securities looked like a good investment vehicle and they became a hot seller on Wall Street. Mutual funds, pension funds, foreign investors .... they were all eager to buy Mortgage Backed Securities. The more Mortgage Backed Securities loan brokers sold, the more money loan brokers made.
3. One small problem, however. THE SUPPLY OF CREDIT-WORTHY BORROWERS WAS RUNNING OUT. Few credit-worthy borrowers = Few good quality mortgages = Few Mortgage Backed Securities to sell = Fewer profits to be made.
4. What to do?
Easy:
"Forget about 'credit-worthy'. Those pigeons on Wall Street will buy ANY Mortgage Backed Securities we sell. If we put up rotting meat labelled 'Mortgage Backed Securities' for sale, those pigeons will buy the rotted meat from us! If the pigeons die from our rotted meat, we don't care. All we care about is making as much money as we can regardless of the legality of our actions!"
The new business model was: Find an unlimited supply of borrowers with a pulse regardless of ability to repay = Write out an unlimited supply of mortgages to these deadbeats = Bundle up this financial equivalent of tainted meat into an unlimited supply of Mortgage Backed Securities to sell to the pigeons on Wall Street = Rake in an unlimited supply of profits even in we poison the lifeblood of America's economy.
In the Toxic Mortgage Scam, the Wall Street investors (America's mutual funds, America's pension funds, America's individual investors, America's banks) were the "pigeons", the "marks", the "suckers" that were sold that poisonous tainted meat. The so-called "house buyers" were nothing more than the rotted meat used in the scam.
The new twist is that Obama wants our tax dollars to rescue the rotted meat.
Correct......and red-lining was outlawed.
I mean, does it take a rocket scientist to realize that banks were forced to make these loans, and knowing full well they would default, the could not get rid of them fast enough?
Only a DEMOCRAT couldn’t see this mess in the making.
Pat is not entirely truthful here. Banks were threatened by ACORN with lawsuits and Barry was instrumental in this.
Once you have a system for awarding mortgages, and the government makes you disregard it and award bad mortgages under pain of lawsuit (or criminal conviction for all I know), HOW can you blame greedy businessmen for this?
This cluster is one hundred percent US Government designed and executed.
And mostly by Rats: Carter, Clinton, Cuomo, and Frank did most of it via CRA and Fannie Mae.
Acutally, I think it began when we lost all our manufacturing jobs and became just about consumerism. We have nothing to sustain ourselves now.
“No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible.” Voltaire
70% of what drove our economy’s engine over the last 8 years was consumer spending.
It’s odd how everyone’s a finger-pointing miser now.
Let’s not forget to blame US, the American public, for letting a generation of politicians and special interest groups bully us into being so PC that we were not willing to stand up and say “Everyone doesn’t deserve to OWN a home. Everyone deserves to EARN a home.”
We were too busy shopping at the mall spending our home equity and stock dividends. This was a group effort.
But the mortgages were only the start... Sub-prime is a drop in the bucket compared to the total debt that we have gotten ourselves into. The defaults on Prime Option Arms and Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities and Corporate Bonds that are coming very soon are going to dwarf the sub-prime mess.
Yep. Best three sentence analysis I have ever seen.
As a Boomer I resent this statement! It's correct of course but I still resent it! :D) Don't forget the greatest generation went far down the path to socialism before us. Great Society anyone?
The more tangible root cause is the post-christian Ivy League education the American Leadership received. Of itself, tho, that is basically institutionalized narcissism...:)
Very good point.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2136635/posts
Are you looking for a job?
Note: This thread is updated on a regular basis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.