Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man critical of Obama case judge visited by marshals
World Net Daily ^ | March 21, 2009 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/21/2009 4:20:59 AM PDT by AJMCQ

Edited on 03/21/2009 4:43:24 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

A Washington, D.C., man who believes Barack Obama probably isn't eligible to be president and colorfully stated as much to a federal judge who dismissed a case challenging Obama's residency in the White House says he got a visit from U.S. marshals for his exercise of free speech.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; brownshirts; eligibility; lhudesingcuccu; morethorazineplease; ruling; usmarshals; usurper; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Venturer

“as we fall into deeper and deeper disastrous policies of an incompetent leader more and more people will begin to get further emotionally involved in this subject.”

I plead guilty- as charged.

My natural instincts concerning Obozo and his Commie friends are very very difficult to keep in check, and I have already seen some of the consequences. I had 2 e-mails frozen at the connection to Yahoo several months ago. Nothing in them were illegal, obscene, or inflamitory. But they were frozen and I received a message the next day stating that they were “being held for testing”. I e-mailed them back and asked “Testing for What and for Whom?” Of course I received not response.

And this was before the new administration was in place.

The only way I keep my composure is to remind myself that this is still Texas that I live in.


21 posted on 03/21/2009 6:22:01 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AJMCQ
"I told your Gestapo goons we had nothing to talk about"

GOD BLESS THIS MAN!

22 posted on 03/21/2009 6:41:30 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg223
In southeastern MO the term was bologna lipped blue gummer. The polite term at the time was Negro

I'm from south east Mo. I believe I've heard it all. I once heard a black woman referred to as a "mare n*****", it wasn't said in a malicious tone of voice, just matter of factly.

23 posted on 03/21/2009 6:53:22 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
That was a pretty salty letter the guy wrote.

Did he make any threats? If not, he didn't deserve a visit.

24 posted on 03/21/2009 6:55:41 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AJMCQ
Whoa.. This ain't 'Brown shirts'.
This nut threatened the Judge. He's lucky he only 'got a visit' from US Marshals.

You DON'T threaten a judge with physical harm - period. Not even if they ARE an ass and base their decision on the latest edition of Mad Magazine.

That's why there's an appeal process.

25 posted on 03/21/2009 6:57:16 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer

Seems like that’s what people here and WND are doing—using the system to expose the corruption of the system.


26 posted on 03/21/2009 7:07:00 AM PDT by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Yes.

He finished with his speculation on what "ought" to happen to the judge, a physical act not appropriate for a family-oriented report. A short time later, he said he found two U.S. marshals on his doorstep.

27 posted on 03/21/2009 11:09:58 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
He finished with his speculation on what "ought" to happen to the judge, a physical act not appropriate for a family-oriented report.

He told him to go f himself? maybe something worse, it isn't stated. I still don't see a threat of violence.

28 posted on 03/21/2009 11:41:44 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
He told him to go f himself? maybe something worse, it isn't stated. I still don't see a threat of violence.

You assume. Or it could have been "You should be shot on sight!"

So, I guess you'd agree that there could have been a threat of violence, right?

29 posted on 03/21/2009 5:12:59 PM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
You assume. Or it could have been "You should be shot on sight!"

So, I guess you'd agree that there could have been a threat of violence, right?

I did not assume anything.

All the article saysd is, "He finished with his speculation on what "ought" to happen to the judge, a physical act not appropriate for a family-oriented report."

If it were a simple threat of violence the paper would have printed it. It sounds like he said something vulgar.

I don't rule out anything nor do I assume anything.

30 posted on 03/21/2009 6:02:35 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Venturer; AJMCQ

That was a pretty salty letter the guy wrote.

It isnt surprising he got a visit.
***********************************

I agree. it isnt clear to me if he is an atorney or was pro se, but writing a letter like that to a federal judge is going to result in blowback of some type.


31 posted on 03/21/2009 6:12:10 PM PDT by Canedawg (Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kinsman redeemer
Threats of violence against a federal judge is a felony, I'm inclined to think there were no such threats or he would have received more than a "visit" from U.S. Marshals.
32 posted on 03/21/2009 6:16:11 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Selah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

read this


33 posted on 03/21/2009 6:19:22 PM PDT by pandoraou812 (Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn! ...........^............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812
He finished with his speculation on what "ought" to happen to the judge, a physical act not appropriate for a family-oriented report.

Threatening federal judges isn't a smart thing.

34 posted on 03/21/2009 6:45:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

A brief search shows that WND handles profanity in their articles as such:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59822

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91443

-shrug-


35 posted on 03/22/2009 1:53:46 AM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
No it sure isn't but I can understand the frustration the guy is feeling.
36 posted on 03/22/2009 7:04:14 PM PDT by pandoraou812 (Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn! ...........^............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pandoraou812

Oh yeah.


37 posted on 03/22/2009 7:11:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson