Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could the govenment ban guns?
Waynesville Daily Guide ^ | 24 March, 2009 | DawnDee Bostwick

Posted on 03/25/2009 5:28:12 AM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: marktwain

Could America elect an illegal alien?


41 posted on 03/26/2009 5:23:27 AM PDT by bmwcyle (American voters can fix this world if they would just wake up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I double dog throw down dare them to.
42 posted on 03/26/2009 5:25:32 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
BTW, Could somebody give me a few really good examples of a tautology?

A sentence or phrase that, while technically correct, states the same thing twice and then equates them, thus conveying no meaning: "If you can't find what you're looking for, you're not looking in the right place." (Check for tautology if you find yourself tempted to reply "No $hit, Sherlock!")

Less severe: A sentence that conveys meaning but is unnecessarily redundant, as "I saw it with my own eyes".

Sometimes place names where the proper name is taken from a foreign language and the geographical feature part are in English are redundant. "Laguna Lake", "Glendale".

Essentially the opposite of an oxymoron like "Microsoft Works".

43 posted on 03/26/2009 1:49:10 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Hey, they passed a law and made us drive 55 when Jimma Carter was President! /sarcism


44 posted on 03/26/2009 1:57:58 PM PDT by OKC Patriot ("Never Forget"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking; Tax-chick
Thank you, Thinking.

Hey, Tax-chick, check out #43 for some good tautologies.

The ones I could think of are: "Survival of the fittest" (because "fittest" is implicitly defined as "those who survive," so it essentially means, "Survival of those who survive.")

And the old stand-by, "A true Scot does not put sugar on his oatmeal," in all its variations. ("But Angus MacPherson of Aberdeen does!" -- "Ach, but then he's no true Scot!")

45 posted on 03/26/2009 2:54:57 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“I made a wrong mistake” — Yogi Berra


46 posted on 03/26/2009 3:01:46 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking; Tax-chick
In the other sense of the word tautology, Paul McCartney's

"in this everchanging world in which we live in"

surely deserves a mention.

47 posted on 03/26/2009 3:03:30 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
And the old stand-by, "A true Scot does not put sugar on his oatmeal," in all its variations. ("But Angus MacPherson of Aberdeen does!" -- "Ach, but then he's no true Scot!")

Sounds like global warming.

48 posted on 03/26/2009 3:03:33 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

You got it. Global “climate change”.


49 posted on 03/26/2009 3:04:23 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

That’s a good one.

Some acronyms are intentionally self-referencing, like GNU (for “Gnu’s Not Unix”; any letter would have worked as the first one)


50 posted on 03/26/2009 3:05:51 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: Mrs. Don-o

Excellent.


52 posted on 03/26/2009 4:06:52 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." ~Sam Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

By the way, the Full Auto Ban Amendment to the 1986 “Firearms Owners Protection Act” never REALLY passed! It was just on a voice vote, and the Nays WAY outweighed the Yeas on the Amendment’s adoption ballot! I heard it! Tip O’Neal just PROCLAIMED that it passed, to the GASPS of many in attendence, and the minority Repubs could not challenge him because of the parlimentary rules in effect at the time! HONEST! History!


53 posted on 03/27/2009 10:04:10 PM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
“By the way, the Full Auto Ban Amendment to the 1986 “Firearms Owners Protection Act” never REALLY passed! It was just on a voice vote, and the Nays WAY outweighed the Yeas on the Amendment’s adoption ballot! I heard it! Tip O’Neal just PROCLAIMED that it passed, to the GASPS of many in attendence, and the minority Repubs could not challenge him because of the parlimentary rules in effect at the time! HONEST! History!”

Yes, you are correct. I saw it on C-Span at the time it happened, and I even have it on tape (Beta!) somewhere. I do believe it was someone other than Tip O’Neil who held the gavel, though I am sure that he engineered it.

It was horrible to watch, a real rape of the legislative process. Just after freedom fighters had force through a bill to protect gun owners from the worst abuses of the 1968 bill, the Democrat leadership used Robert's Rules trickery and the lie to tack on a ban of future manufacture of common infantry arms in the U.S. for civilians. Some Republicans, thinking clearly, closed down the process before they could also ban manufacture of sound suppressors to protect hearing.

Tip O'Neil was an evil, evil man who violated his oath of office often and without remorse.

54 posted on 03/28/2009 5:21:10 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson