Skip to comments.
Could the govenment ban guns?
Waynesville Daily Guide ^
| 24 March, 2009
| DawnDee Bostwick
Posted on 03/25/2009 5:28:12 AM PDT by marktwain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: marktwain
Could America elect an illegal alien?
41
posted on
03/26/2009 5:23:27 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(American voters can fix this world if they would just wake up.)
To: marktwain
I double dog throw down dare them to.
42
posted on
03/26/2009 5:25:32 AM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(Nemo me impune lacessit)
To: Mrs. Don-o
BTW, Could somebody give me a few really good examples of a tautology?A sentence or phrase that, while technically correct, states the same thing twice and then equates them, thus conveying no meaning: "If you can't find what you're looking for, you're not looking in the right place." (Check for tautology if you find yourself tempted to reply "No $hit, Sherlock!")
Less severe: A sentence that conveys meaning but is unnecessarily redundant, as "I saw it with my own eyes".
Sometimes place names where the proper name is taken from a foreign language and the geographical feature part are in English are redundant. "Laguna Lake", "Glendale".
Essentially the opposite of an oxymoron like "Microsoft Works".
43
posted on
03/26/2009 1:49:10 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: marktwain
Hey, they passed a law and made us drive 55 when Jimma Carter was President! /sarcism
44
posted on
03/26/2009 1:57:58 PM PDT
by
OKC Patriot
("Never Forget"!)
To: Still Thinking; Tax-chick
Thank you, Thinking.
Hey, Tax-chick, check out #43 for some good tautologies.
The ones I could think of are: "Survival of the fittest" (because "fittest" is implicitly defined as "those who survive," so it essentially means, "Survival of those who survive.")
And the old stand-by, "A true Scot does not put sugar on his oatmeal," in all its variations. ("But Angus MacPherson of Aberdeen does!" -- "Ach, but then he's no true Scot!")
45
posted on
03/26/2009 2:54:57 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
“I made a wrong mistake” — Yogi Berra
46
posted on
03/26/2009 3:01:46 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Still Thinking; Tax-chick
In the other sense of the word
tautology, Paul McCartney's
"in this everchanging world in which we live in"
surely deserves a mention.
47
posted on
03/26/2009 3:03:30 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
And the old stand-by, "A true Scot does not put sugar on his oatmeal," in all its variations. ("But Angus MacPherson of Aberdeen does!" -- "Ach, but then he's no true Scot!")Sounds like global warming.
48
posted on
03/26/2009 3:03:33 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Still Thinking
You got it. Global “climate change”.
49
posted on
03/26/2009 3:04:23 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
That’s a good one.
Some acronyms are intentionally self-referencing, like GNU (for “Gnu’s Not Unix”; any letter would have worked as the first one)
50
posted on
03/26/2009 3:05:51 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
Comment #51 Removed by Moderator
To: Mrs. Don-o
52
posted on
03/26/2009 4:06:52 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." ~Sam Brown)
To: marktwain
By the way, the Full Auto Ban Amendment to the 1986 Firearms Owners Protection Act never REALLY passed! It was just on a voice vote, and the Nays WAY outweighed the Yeas on the Amendments adoption ballot! I heard it! Tip ONeal just PROCLAIMED that it passed, to the GASPS of many in attendence, and the minority Repubs could not challenge him because of the parlimentary rules in effect at the time! HONEST! History!
53
posted on
03/27/2009 10:04:10 PM PDT
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: 2harddrive
“By the way, the Full Auto Ban Amendment to the 1986 Firearms Owners Protection Act never REALLY passed! It was just on a voice vote, and the Nays WAY outweighed the Yeas on the Amendments adoption ballot! I heard it! Tip ONeal just PROCLAIMED that it passed, to the GASPS of many in attendence, and the minority Repubs could not challenge him because of the parlimentary rules in effect at the time! HONEST! History!”
Yes, you are correct. I saw it on C-Span at the time it happened, and I even have it on tape (Beta!) somewhere. I do believe it was someone other than Tip O’Neil who held the gavel, though I am sure that he engineered it.
It was horrible to watch, a real rape of the legislative process. Just after freedom fighters had force through a bill to protect gun owners from the worst abuses of the 1968 bill, the Democrat leadership used Robert's Rules trickery and the lie to tack on a ban of future manufacture of common infantry arms in the U.S. for civilians. Some Republicans, thinking clearly, closed down the process before they could also ban manufacture of sound suppressors to protect hearing.
Tip O'Neil was an evil, evil man who violated his oath of office often and without remorse.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson