Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hardly. Collateral isn't a cost. AIG has investments, in bonds or whatever, and it simply pledges some of those as collateral, that Lehman or Citi will pay their leases as due. AIG still owns those investments, and still earns all the interest on them. It is also collecting its underwriting fees for guaranteeing the payments if either Lehman or Citi break their leases. None of this is a cost.
13 posted on 03/26/2009 1:49:03 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: JasonC

So Lehman is still paying their lease?


14 posted on 03/26/2009 1:56:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (What happened to my IRAs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: JasonC; Ernest_at_the_Beach
The WSJ reporting that the collateral on Lehman's lease is held in AIG bank accounts at the London branch of the Bank of New York Mellon. According to a previous filing, AIG Financial Products Corp. supplied the securitization of the leases through credit-default swaps.

Collateral isn't a cost but the thing that caused the need to post it (a downgrade in credit ratings) can indeed be costly as it may lead to reduced credit availability. In the case of AIG, however, that shouldn't be a problem as any slack will simply be picked up by you and me.

19 posted on 03/26/2009 2:29:51 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson