Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution foes facing setback
San Antonio Express News ^ | 3/27/09 | Gary Scharrer

Posted on 03/27/2009 6:23:20 AM PDT by laotzu

AUSTIN — The State Board of Education gave a nearly-final nod to new science curriculum standards Thursday that would change a long-standing Texas tradition over how schoolchildren learn about evolution.

The tentative vote — a final one is expected today — will mean teachers and students no longer will be expected to discuss the “strengths and weaknesses” of evolution and the theory about the origin of life developed by Charles Darwin 150 years ago.

The move is a setback for critics of evolution, who argued that teachers and students should have to analyze the “strengths and weaknesses” of evolution — a standard that has been a part of Texas school science standards for 20 years.

But the argument over how to teach evolution continues, with final votes today on several amendments that some scientists say seek to cast doubt on evolution.

One asks students to evaluate fossil types, as some contend gaps in fossil records create scientific evidence against universal common descent. Another questions “natural selection.”

Scientists are working on Rick Agosto, D-San Antonio, in an effort to switch his votes on the amendments. He voted with the social conservatives on the amendments, though he ultimately sided with scientists on the “strengths and weaknesses” issue. The vote was 7-7; eight votes were needed to restore it.

Mary Helen Berlanga, D-Corpus Christi, who missed Thursday's hearing, is expected to participate in the final vote.

“If you can't attack evolution through strengths and weaknesses, talk about the insufficiency of natural selection. We see this in other states. This is what creationists are doing — is attacking evolution,” said Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education.

Scientists and more than 50 national and state science organizations urged the 15-member board Thursday not to include references “to creationist-fabricated ‘weaknesses' or other attempts to undermine instruction on evolution.”

Many scientists contend basic evolutionary theory at the high school level has no weaknesses, and to suggest it does would confuse students.

However, Ken Mercer, R-San Antonio, fought to restore the “strengths and weaknesses” clause, which board-appointed science experts removed from the proposed standards. The board's seven social conservative members supported that effort but fell one vote short.

Not all scientists agree about evolution, Mercer argued.

“There are questions about evolution. ... There are weaknesses,” he said.

Darwin's theory of evolution posits that all life is descended from a common ancestor.

The theory is not without its critics. Darwinists try to conceal some of the weaknesses and fallacies of evolution theory, said Barbara Cargill, R-The Woodlands.

“They are not the sole possessors of truth. Our schoolchildren belong to the parents, and they want their children educated,” she said. “They don't want them indoctrinated with one side. They know that evolution has weaknesses.”

The new science curriculum standards will take effect in the 2010-2011 school year and last a decade.

The standards will influence new science textbooks, not only for Texas but also for most other states. Publishers, considering the volume, typically duplicate textbooks used by Texas schools. About 4.6 million students attend K-12 grades in Texas public schools.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; commonsenseprevails; fairnessdoctrine; headsexplodingatdi; idjunkscience; intelligentdesign; junkscience; oldearthspeculation; piltdownman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
Genuine science, by definition, must be questioned. Dogma must not.

The 'experts' agree. Much like global warming, evolution is not science.

1 posted on 03/27/2009 6:23:20 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: laotzu
The tentative vote — a final one is expected today — will mean teachers and students no longer will be expected to discuss the “strengths and weaknesses” of evolution and the theory about the origin of life developed by Charles Darwin 150 years ago.

This is supposed to be a good thing for education? Good grief.

2 posted on 03/27/2009 6:36:18 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

evolutionism is a secular humanist religion....dogma that is ENFORCED on school children.....disgusting....


3 posted on 03/27/2009 6:38:05 AM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

Yep. What’s wrong with some debate in the classroom? Do the evos really want to steal taxpayer’s money and give them no say on what gets taught to their kids? Of course, my kids aren’t going to learn about the supposed “strengths” of that idiotic religion of evolutionary. But I will have to pay for other kids to learn it despite the first amendment.


4 posted on 03/27/2009 6:39:24 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

All fields of science must be considered equal (i.e. the evil-spirit theory of disease, the flat-earth theory of geography, the Ptolemaic theory of astronomy, etc must get equal time with creationism).


5 posted on 03/27/2009 6:41:37 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

Sigh - the new Dark Ages are upon us, when the religious fanatics will be burning intellectuals in the streets, and all thought will be banned.

/obvious sarcasm


6 posted on 03/27/2009 6:41:59 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (True nobility is exempt from fear - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
What’s wrong with some debate in the classroom?

Then you support teaching the evil-spirit theory of disease, etc.

7 posted on 03/27/2009 6:42:42 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

Excellent. The biological-science version of the “Fairness Doctrine” goes down in flames.


8 posted on 03/27/2009 6:43:32 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I don’t believe anyone should take money from one person to teach another person’s kid. But regardless of that, the Religion of Evolution is just as stupid as all that voodoo junk. So I guess you’re right, debate isn’t good, evolution should just be dropped all together and they should just teach observable science and leave the metaphysical study of origins to churches and voodoo huts.


9 posted on 03/27/2009 6:50:00 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
“Then you support teaching the evil-spirit theory of disease, etc.”

Why not? When I was in school, those earlier ideas WERE discussed. One can easily see what “theory” the evidence supports, and reject the ones that aren't supported!

(Or is that exactly what you fear?)

10 posted on 03/27/2009 6:52:29 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

I don’t see why it should matter either way. The reality is that there are no weaknesses in evolution. The weakness exist only in the minds of those who are incapable or unwilling to understand.

The curriculum wouldn’t change either way.


11 posted on 03/27/2009 6:58:57 AM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Why does this need to be taught in the school? Like it or not, creationism is a religious belief and schools are not in the business of teaching religious doctrine. If parents do not want their kids exposed, they can home-school their kids or send them to religious schools.


12 posted on 03/27/2009 7:01:03 AM PDT by TerP26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TerP26

Evolution is a religious belief. If you want religion out of the classroom, get ALL religions out of the classroom including evolution.


13 posted on 03/27/2009 7:03:16 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
Genuine science, by definition, must be questioned. Dogma must not.

Those that question dogma like the earth is round or that it revolves around the sun are considered nuts, not scientists.

14 posted on 03/27/2009 7:05:03 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TerP26
The point really is that a lot of people see Evolution as simply a worldview which is in competition with Christianity. Evolutionary evidence is seen as lacking, and belief in Evolution is seen as largely based on faith, with a zealous belief that evolution is not to be questioned.

And the questions you ask are fairly valid: Why does this need to be taught in the school?

15 posted on 03/27/2009 7:05:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (American Revolution II -- overdue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

“Excellent. The biological-science version of the “Fairness Doctrine” goes down in flames.”

So many things wrong with this comparison that it boggles the mind.

1) We aren’t talking about a free market system of the airwaves and forcing rejected ideas to have the same treatment as accepted, popular ideas. We’re talking about a government funded monopoly that many children have no choice about attending. Such a system should be required to present alternative views.

2) We aren’t talking about political commentary. We’re talking about a scientific “theory” (In quotes because there’s nothing scientific at all about evolution. In fact, it defies the scientific method.) that shouldn’t have to be protected from its critics.

3) We aren’t talking about liberals, who are all in a tizzy and fearful because they’re ideas aren’t popular and can’t be sold to the American people no matter how they are packaged. We’re talking about scientists who are in a tizzy and fearful..... Oh wait. Maybe there are some similarities.


16 posted on 03/27/2009 7:05:52 AM PDT by Shadowfax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Hasn’t the pope come out in support of evolution?


17 posted on 03/27/2009 7:07:55 AM PDT by TerP26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TerP26

I think he claims it is compatible with the Bible. But I’m not sure on his complete stance...


18 posted on 03/27/2009 7:09:07 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm SO glad I no longer belong to the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: laotzu

Go for it, secular humanists. You will encourage more Christian families to enroll their children in parochial schools or join the thousands who home school in Texas. You will then have ZERO influence on the education of thousands of future Texans, the best and brightest ones at that.

With every child who leaves the government school system, dollars are subtracted from the system. With every family that puts their child in parochial schools or home schools, there is less need for them to vote for the next government school bond issue. And thus the government indoctrination grows weaker.

God works in mysterious ways His wonders to perform.


19 posted on 03/27/2009 7:09:22 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“Those that question dogma like the earth is round or that it revolves around the sun are considered nuts, not scientists.”

Such a statement betrays a serious lack of understanding about the scientific method or a serious commitment to deceit.

The nature of the Earth and its relationship to the Sun are observable, testable, predictive things.

Evolution is none of those. Therefore, it cannot be considered science.


20 posted on 03/27/2009 7:09:38 AM PDT by Shadowfax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson