And for all you self-appointed "posting police", I KNOW this has been posted before and guess what, if there is no objection by J.R., I will post it again.
just kiddin' ya :-)
Posted on 03/28/2009 6:06:58 AM PDT by kellynla
Edited on 03/28/2009 7:35:16 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Whereas, by requirement of the United States Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, no one can be sworn into office as president of the United States without being a natural born citizen;
And for all you self-appointed "posting police", I KNOW this has been posted before and guess what, if there is no objection by J.R., I will post it again.
just kiddin' ya :-)
So we are supposed to roll over and play nice-doggie?
The point is to take a page from the lib's textbook. Push and push until something gives; sue and counter-sue; make as much raucous noise as possible; get in their face; petition and picket; repeat as needed.
Conservatives need to grow spines.
LOL...I haven’t seen that pic in years!
“Conservatives need to grow spines.”
Thank you!
There have been entirely too many Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen & Marines’ lives spent fighting for this county and I WILL NOT “roll over and play nice-doggie!”
We can only hope & pray to God that the Gelding Old Party gets a “spine & testicle” implant before next year so we can begin to take our country back!
Semper Fi,
Kelly
:-)
When I saw self-appointed "posting police" I HAD to dig through my gif files and post it.
the devil made me do it ;-)
Unlike Barney Fife, the SAPP are apparently not issued even one bullet. But they continue to fire a lot of blanks.
You go girl!!!
bttt
“They’ll find that the election itself trumps the constitution.”
I kind of got the impression that was the buzz in between the election and the inauguration.
Whatever the real deal is, the information is sealed just like all of his other records are sealed. Obama’s administration carries on - quickly, too. Levin never, ever touches upon this subject but to my knowledge has never explained why. If this could go somewhere, of all people, Levin would be covering it - but not a peep. To me, that speaks volumes.
“You go girl?”
You’ve been ‘round here for five years and you still don’t know that I don’t have the plumbing to be a “girl?”
Well, I guess you’re the last to find out. LOL
Semper Fi,
Kelly
To me, that speaks volumes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What does it speak? Why isn’t Levin covering it?
I ^suspect^ that the big time radio pundits (except Rush) are avoiding it because they don’t to look racist about a slutty white chick that shtupped multiple partners of color. Rush, I think, is more focused on the socialist policies.
Squishy Medved said he isn’t giving it time because Stanley Dunham was an American citizen and that automatically makes Opossum a citizen.
What does it speak? Why isn’t Levin covering it?
_______________________
I have a few guesses but I’m not Mark so I can’t answer for him. I have enough respect for him to believe that there is a very solid reason so I personally choose to follow his lead. If he has discussed his refusal to get into this issue on-air and in depth, I’ve missed the discussion.
I’ve heard Hannity touch upon it in a brief, sort of ‘throwing it out there for you to decide’ way; I’m not sure about the others. Although he’s not considered conservative talk radio, George Noory on Coast-to-Coast has covered it more than once.
I ^suspect^ that the big time radio pundits (except Rush) are avoiding it because they don’t to look racist about a slutty white chick that shtupped multiple partners of color.
___________________________
Could be...the part that fascinates me is the motive behind the fight to hide it. Is it because there really is something to hide, or is it simply a power play that Obama will use against us in the future?
No problemo... think nothing of it...I don’t...LOL
just an intrusive thought,but perhaps all those suits were dismissed because they’re asking for documents with the wrong name ?
could petition all you want for whatever from me,but if you’re using a name that I never had,
how far would you get ?
Maybe there is no “obama” on his paperwork ?
Or something along this train of thought ?
What I am wondering if, as you intimated, charging at this thing directly (and obvious manner) is really the way to approach this. Perhaps this does not call so much for the roar of a locomotive, but the guile of the snake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.