Skip to comments.Abortion Doctor 'Molested Three Pregnant Women While They Were Under Anaesthetic'
Posted on 03/30/2009 10:10:44 AM PDT by Steelfish
Abortion doctor 'molested three pregnant women while they were under anaesthetic'
By Daily Mail Reporter 30th March 2009
Pictured outside Manchester Crown Court: Dr Narendra Sharma
A doctor molested three pregnant women as they were undergoing terminations at a Marie Stopes family planning clinic, a court heard today.
Dr Narendra Sharma, 51, stunned colleagues when he began using the women's hands to carry out sexual acts upon himself as they lay semi-conscious under anaesthetic, it was claimed.
One nurse reacted with 'shock, horror and utter disbelief' when she spotted anaesthetist Sharma exposing himself after holding one patient's hand and noticing 'up and down movements,' a jury was told.
The incidents occurred over an 11-day period during termination procedures at the Manchester branch of the worldwide charitable organisation which helps protect young mothers from back street abortions.
The women aged between 18 and 22 were under a 'partial' anaesthetic. They were not under a full general anaesthic but were unaware of their surroundings.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I’m pretty sure there are a couple items not in the Hippocratic oath.
Anyone that will murder a baby will do anything including raping that babies mother..Sick minds is what it takes to kill babies..
This guy just wants the express train to Hell.
What an idiot. And he does in full view of witnesses.
Hey Dr. . . . look at my thumb
Wonder if he’ll be allowed to practice when the socialized medicine bill becomes law.
Legal or not, all abortions are "back street abortions."
“One nurse reacted with ‘shock, horror and utter disbelief’”
To bad she doesn’t react the same way to the slaughtering of babies.
I worked in a hospital operating room for a while, and personally witnessed an anaesthesiologist groping an unconscious woman. It was one of the experiences that turned me away from a career in medicine.
Why not? We’re going to get steamed over this all the while he’s killing someone else.
Diversity in action?
Why is it that nothing inside of my brain thinks this is unusual.
Yea, what the good doctor did with his patient’s hand is small potatoes compared to what he did to her womb.
No doubt it distracted her from her normal routine of sorting out the pieces of butched babies.
The guy sounds like a real jackoff...
People who murder for a living can’t be expected to have the highest moral standards. Mass murderers aren’t inhibited by our sexual taboos.
So what? That is a minor thing, compared to the gross evil of the abortions he’s performed. And the women killing their own babies deserve worse than some petty molestation-fondling, too.
What would you expect from an abortion doctor?
There’s not a hole in hell hot enough for a physician who abuses those who have come to him for help.
Our next Surgeon General!
I couldn’t agree more. These people turn my stomach.
“I was shocked that the doctor was sexually assaulting her while he was murderring her child.” said the accomplice.
Interestingly enough, the original Hippocratic Oath specifically condemned both abortion AND using medicine as cover for immoral sex...
I swear by Apollo, Asclepius, Hygieia, and Panacea, and I take to witness all the gods, all the goddesses, to keep according to my ability and my judgment, the following Oath.
(Care for teachers, and their kids) To consider dear to me, as my parents, him who taught me this art; to live in common with him and, if necessary, to share my goods with him; To look upon his children as my own brothers, to teach them this art.
(Do good, and no harm) I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone.
(No euthanasia, no abortion) I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan; and similarly I will not give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion.
But I will preserve the purity of my life and my arts.
(Won't do surgery--outside of my specialty) I will not cut for stone, even for patients in whom the disease is manifest; I will leave this operation to be performed by practitioners, specialists in this art.
(Won't engage in immoral sex with patients (note the homosexual prohibition)) In every house where I come I will enter only for the good of my patients, keeping myself far from all intentional ill-doing and all seduction and especially from the pleasures of love with women or with men, be they free or slaves.
(Trade secrets) All that may come to my knowledge in the exercise of my profession or in daily commerce with men, which ought not to be spread abroad, I will keep secret and will never reveal.
(Swearing the oath) If I keep this oath faithfully, may I enjoy my life and practice my art, respected by all men and in all times; but if I swerve from it or violate it, may the reverse be my lot.
One nurse reacted with shock, horror and utter disbelief
One nurse.... it should say an accomplice to murder
And there is everything wrong with it, right?
When murdering babies is acceptable, what would make you think they had any ethics ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.