Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

Fixed it: Evolution should not be taught in any class that calls itself “Science” class. Evolution is the antithesis of science.


13 posted on 03/30/2009 2:10:58 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts
Nope.

Science is based upon finding natural causes to explain natural phenomena.

Creationism is based upon discounting natural causes and attempting to explain any contradictions by supernatural agency.

Science is based upon not being married to any particular interpretation but being willing to go where the data takes you; thus no theory is ever “proven” but accepted provisionally awaiting further data to either reject or refine the theory.

Creationism is based upon blind adherence to a literal interpretation (where it serves), and attempting to fit the “round peg” of the data into the “square hole” of their adamant unchanging and inflexible assumptions of innerency in scriptural interpretation.

But it is not just Evolution you and your ilk oppose GGG. It is Astronomy, Physics and Geology.

Should those also not be taught in any class that calls itself “Science” for the identical reason that they also do not subject their data and theories to your literal interpretation?

17 posted on 03/30/2009 2:25:34 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson