Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese 'Kill Weapon' Gives U.S. Navy Cause for Concern
Fox News ^ | March 31, 2009 | Fox News

Posted on 04/01/2009 5:16:15 AM PDT by Scanian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: frankiep
Why would China want to destroy us when they already own us?

I think the one danger is that China decides to take Taiwan by force. Do you really think Obama is going to launch nukes over Taiwan? He needs Chinese money to pay for his glorious "investments."

21 posted on 04/01/2009 6:25:58 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Obama's multi- trillion dollar agenda would be a "man caused disaster")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Special thanks to Bill Clinton for giving the Chinese our ballistic missile guiding technology in the mid-90’s.


22 posted on 04/01/2009 6:49:13 AM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Worked for General Electric on the original design of the CWIS. GE Burlington Vt made the gun (Vulcan) GE Pittsfield Ma. made the structure and General Dynamics made the radar.
I spent time cruising around the Pacific missile range on the USS King(DLG-10) shooting down targets towed by F4s that we could not even see until they were actually blown up with the hits of depleted uranimum.


23 posted on 04/01/2009 7:33:58 AM PDT by Surfer Bert (Remember when seconds count police are only minutes away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Worked for General Electric on the original design of the CWIS. GE Burlington Vt made the gun (Vulcan) GE Pittsfield Ma. made the structure and General Dynamics made the radar.
I spent time cruising around the Pacific missile range on the USS King(DLG-10) shooting down targets towed by F4s that we could not even see until they were actually blown up with the hits of depleted uranimum.


24 posted on 04/01/2009 7:35:10 AM PDT by Surfer Bert (Remember when seconds count police are only minutes away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


25 posted on 04/01/2009 10:22:40 AM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Probably a knock-off of the Iskander-M missle, which is proported by the Russians to have only a max range of 400KM, but is rumored to have a range of 1800KM if a booster is added. Russia is not supposed to have that version (Banned by the IRBM treaty), but you know that they do, and they have alot of these. They probably shared this tech with the Chinese, and that’s how China has these things.


26 posted on 04/01/2009 12:21:14 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

27 posted on 04/01/2009 1:14:10 PM PDT by magslinger (I talk to myself but sometimes I like a third opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

It may also be a continued development of a variant of the Soviet SS-N-8 SLBM. The Soviets were developing a version with a radar terminal guidance to lock on to a task force, payload was to be nuclear. This was never deployed, can’t say whether it was tested. I’m out of town right now, away from my library (including Conway’s). My guess is that the intent was to spot the carrier task force with a Bear, Badger, or a RORSAT, send the position to a launching sub perhaps via Punch Bowl.


28 posted on 04/01/2009 2:02:25 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (Leftism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I do not believe that the Chinese are capable of such technology and that we do not have a defense measure against it.


29 posted on 04/01/2009 2:04:09 PM PDT by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Flash Point Taiwan
30 posted on 04/01/2009 4:12:08 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice; Scanian; jveritas; magslinger
The U.S. Naval Institute, a pro-military organization, notes that a post on a Chinese blog considered credible by military analysts provides a description of an anti-ship ballistic missile that could hit U.S. ships from about 1,240 miles.

Don't know how reliable the skinny is but sounds like a Silk Worm on Steroids....lots of steroids.

If the launch is near orbital, it's shootable; Aegis on the pickets will take care of that.

If the launch is a cruise missile....hell, 1240 miles is absurd.

兵不厭詐。

All warfare is based on deception.

I'd look for Kilo after a distraction.
31 posted on 04/01/2009 7:55:05 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: babyfreep
“As a mother of a son on a carrier in that part of the world, I find this very difficult to read.

Fear not. Your son is safer at sea, aboard a carrier, than on liberty call.

The best defense is a good offense. A carrier and it's battle group are designed to project force. They employ a multitude of air, surface, and subsurface assets to identify and attack potential threats before they become threats. They train to do this nearly 24/7 and they are very good at it.

32 posted on 04/02/2009 5:00:10 AM PDT by ryan71 (TERM LIMITS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sig Sauer P220; All
Don’t worry, Obama will tell China to stop that. All is well.


33 posted on 04/02/2009 9:17:05 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Obama's multi- trillion dollar agenda would be a "man caused disaster")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson