[edzo4]

Sorry, I have to call BS, What could Romney veto when he was outnumber 90 to 10?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Senate

Democrats hold a supermajority in the Senate.

Democratic 35 87.5%
Republican 5 12.5%
40 Total Seats

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_House_of_Representatives

The Democrats hold a supermajority in the House. Only in the Hawaii Senate do Democrats have a larger majority over Republicans

Democratic 141 89.9%
Republican 19 10.1%
Total Seats 160

[outpostinmass2]

I replied to a post that said Massachusetts will vote dem in the next election for governor.

Before Patrick the Republicans held the seat for sixteen years. No bullshit regardless of the congressional make-up.

It might be hard to fathom but I can remember a time when Massachusetts had two u.s. republican congressmen and a U.S. republican senators. This was 1980 not ancient history.

Times change I guess.

Mitt Romney pledged to increase republican presence in this state and never followed through. He instead spent all of his campaign money on himself. Mitt isn't the worse politician in the world but let's just say I wouldn't charge into battle if he was leading.

[Leisler]

Mitt could of vetoed, pocket vetoed each and every bill. You know, make a name for himself. Stand for something. Actually pic a judge or something. Maybe spotlight something. Anything. You know, get famous like the Alamo, Little Big Horn. Instead we got....