Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Ward] Churchill wins CU suit but awarded just $1
The Denver Post ^ | 04/02/2009 | Felisa Cardona

Posted on 04/02/2009 3:39:11 PM PDT by Pondo

Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

The jury gave Churchill $1 for

(Excerpt) Read more at denverpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 1dollar; academia; antiamerican; cu; dimestoreindian; lawsuit; nutcase; phony; phonyindian; plagiarist; wardchurchill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-138 next last
Gave him $1 in damages.
1 posted on 04/02/2009 3:39:14 PM PDT by Pondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pondo

The University will undoubtedly take him back. It’s a world gone mad.


2 posted on 04/02/2009 3:40:30 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

Please tell me this is satire... $1 is way
too much compensation for that imposter!


3 posted on 04/02/2009 3:40:49 PM PDT by Jo Nuvark (Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark

Wish it was a joke. Another O.J. jury.


4 posted on 04/02/2009 3:41:33 PM PDT by Pondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

Please tell me this is a late April Fool’s joke.


5 posted on 04/02/2009 3:42:40 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo
Still too much. The jury asked if $0 was an option and the judge said a buck minimum.
6 posted on 04/02/2009 3:43:31 PM PDT by RedCell (Honor thy Father (9/6/07) - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

APRIL FOOLS trick??? He is a FOOL and so is the jury. I am really turning against the AMerican people.


7 posted on 04/02/2009 3:43:33 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo
And is $0 an option?"

They may have wanted to give him zilch.

8 posted on 04/02/2009 3:43:41 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Now the fraud gets to pay David Lane.


9 posted on 04/02/2009 3:43:55 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Caplis and Silverman are dissecting the verdict on the air.

630 KHOW

10 posted on 04/02/2009 3:46:59 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pondo
Maybe this IS the way to go!

The Jury says, “Ya, it is because of what you said, and you can not be fired for what you said. However, we HATE what you said” -—

IF that is how they feel, this is a way to resolve it.

However, had I been on the Jury, I would have said he was fired for being a complete fraud and phony. He is not an Indian. He steals most of his written material. He does not have the credentials he has claimed.

BECAUSE of his controversial statements, the University did more research on this nut case.

11 posted on 04/02/2009 3:47:19 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

“I cannot meet with you. Please re-read the instructions concerning damages if you find for the plaintiff but find no damages (you will have to) find in the sum of $1.”

I have a problem understanding the logic here. If there were no damages, there were no damages. Why would they have to give him a dollar if there were no damages? Giving him a dollar implies that there was a dollar’s worth of damages.

What the hell is the matter with the law?


12 posted on 04/02/2009 3:49:00 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo; Pharmboy

Indian want wampum..didn’t get much.


13 posted on 04/02/2009 3:50:50 PM PDT by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

Wonder if that grandstander David Lane is on the 1/3 contingency fee plan? LOL


14 posted on 04/02/2009 3:51:38 PM PDT by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

And my diploma is once again about as useful as toilet paper.


15 posted on 04/02/2009 3:51:39 PM PDT by 14erClimb (Third world hell hole status, here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Problem still is, regardless of the jury award, once the jury finds for the plaintiff, the judge gets to decide if he gets back pay or his job back.


16 posted on 04/02/2009 3:51:49 PM PDT by stylin19a (Obama - the ethically excepted asterisk administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pondo
Regarding the 911 attacks...

August, 2003: Ward Churchill Caught On Tape Advocating Terrorism [vs Fellow Americans]

Audio link at Michell Malkin's website (included below)

Question from audience:
You mentioned a little bit ago, "Why did it take a bunch of Arabs to do what you all should have done a long time ago," that's my question.

Churchill: I'm gonna repeat that, tell me if I got that right: Why shouldn't we do something and how do you you move so they don't see you coming.

As to the first part, not a reason in the world that I could see. I can't find a single reason that you shouldn't in a principled way —there may be some practical considerations, such as do you know how (laughter from audience)

—you know, often these things are processes. It's not just an impulse. And certainly it's not just an event.

And the simple answer, although it probably should be more complicated, but I'm not being flip and giving the simple answer, is:
You carry the weapon. That's how they don't see it coming. You're the one...

They talk about "color blind or blind to your color." You said it yourself.

You don't send the Black Liberation Army into Wall Street to conduct an action.

You don't send the American Indian Movement into downtown Seattle to conduct an action.

Who do you send? You. Your beard shaved, your hair cut close, and wearing a banker's suit.

There's probably a whole lot more to it, you know that. But there's where you start. .."

more...

The audio is apparently no longer available -only transcript:
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/001588.htm

____________________________________________________

For all you'll ever need or want to know about
Wright's Marxist "Black Liberation Theology",
see my FR Home page:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/#Section%204

Hint...

"Their founding document [the Weather Underground's] called for the establishment of a "white fighting force" to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement" and other "anti-colonial" movements[1] to achieve "the destruction of US imperialism and the achievement of a classless world: world communism."..."-Berger, Dan (2006). Outlaws of America: The Weather Underground and the Politics of Solidarity. AK Press, 95.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_Underground#cite_ref-Berger_0-0

Outlaws of America: The Weather Underground and the Politics of Solidarity (Paperback) by Dan Berger
http://www.amazon.com/Outlaws-America-Underground-Politics-Solidarity/dp/1904859410

____________________________________________________

From the New York Times, August 24, 2003

"they [the Weather Underground] employed revolutionary jargon, advocated armed struggle and black liberation and began bombing buildings, taking responsibility for at least 20 attacks. Estimates of their number ranged at times from several dozen to several hundred."

Article: Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F04E4DE1539F937A1575BC0A9659C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2

____________________________________________________

Here is a 4 minute video from 2006 in which Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn are asked if Ward Churchill in the late 1960s, as he claims, taught the Weathermen bomb making techniques. Ayers says with a sneaky grin: "memory is a real MF-er".


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjcS6QFtn_g&feature=related

____________________________________________________

"This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English..."
--now President Barack Obama


17 posted on 04/02/2009 3:52:05 PM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

So lying on his resume was okay? Geesh! What is that country coming to?


18 posted on 04/02/2009 3:52:08 PM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo; xzins; enat; jude24
This reminds of the Verdict in Leon Uris' book QBVII.

IIRC, it was also the verdict in "The Verdict".

A Pyrrhic victory.

I think the jury felt compelled to follow the jury instructions. I suspect they really wanted to find for CU, but didn't really buy the story of CU that his termination had "nothing to do with his 9/11 essay."

This is why you should always refuse to agree to follow the jury instructions when you are on voir dire for sitting on a jury.

If you are asked "Will you follow the instructions of the court?" Just answer "That depends on what the instructions are."

Of course you won't be sitting on that jury if that is how you respond.

19 posted on 04/02/2009 3:55:51 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo
I once had to sell a patent to my employer for $1.

I never got the check.

I bugged them about it for years. :-)

20 posted on 04/02/2009 3:55:55 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (From Messiah to Massah in one swell foop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedCell
This is an absolutely jaw-dropping display of dumbassness on the part of the jury! Total Dumbasses! I guess they thought it was cute to award him $1, but this opens the door to reinstatement, an award of attorney's fees, and maybe even back pay. After all, how can you be "wrongfully terminated" and not suffer lost wages?

As far as I know, Churchill didn't even bother to deny he was a faker, a liar, and an academic plagerist. He just said, "They didn't fire me for all that-- it was the essay" and these idiots went for it. Morons!

21 posted on 04/02/2009 3:57:16 PM PDT by San Jacinto (gorebull warming -- the Socialists' Shortcut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pondo
Fraud Churchill was fired because he's a plagiarist, an impostor, and a fabricator...the article on the September 11 tragedy may have touched off the review of his writings, but CU made it clear that he was fired for producing false writings. What is wrong with people these days? Anyway, enjoy your $1 dollar Turd. I hope they pay him with 100 Indian-head pennies.
22 posted on 04/02/2009 3:57:37 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; xzins; enat
I once had to sell a patent to my employer for $1. I never got the check. I bugged them about it for years. :-)

I think you may just own that patent.

23 posted on 04/02/2009 3:58:23 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto

The jurors were probably too stupid/ignorant to realize that.


24 posted on 04/02/2009 3:59:38 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

He may get hundreds of thousands of dollars due to this idiotic $1 verdict. It opens the door to collect attorney’s fees and possible reinstatement with back pay.


25 posted on 04/02/2009 4:00:15 PM PDT by San Jacinto (gorebull warming -- the Socialists' Shortcut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

If I were head of the university, and I had to take him back?????? Windowless basement office the size of a broom closet. No duties except to grade papers 10 hours a day!


26 posted on 04/02/2009 4:00:31 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

He’d look better tarred and feathered.


27 posted on 04/02/2009 4:03:23 PM PDT by SeminoleSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

Wow a whole dollar...Did he get his job back?


28 posted on 04/02/2009 4:03:40 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan

Ignorant would be the operable word. But sometimes stupidity prevents one from realizing he is ignorant.


29 posted on 04/02/2009 4:05:49 PM PDT by San Jacinto (gorebull warming -- the Socialists' Shortcut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Well, at least he won’t be able to buy a whole lotta firewater with that $1 award...that said we should have known that, one way or another, the lawyers ALWAYS get paid.


30 posted on 04/02/2009 4:07:25 PM PDT by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark
Please tell me this is satire... $1 is way too much compensation for that imposter!

Yes it is, but the jury asked the judge if they could give $0. The judge replied the minimum was $1.

31 posted on 04/02/2009 4:13:17 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

He gets his choice of either one. He can go back to work at CU or get paid for the years he could have. Unbelievable.


32 posted on 04/02/2009 4:13:37 PM PDT by Wisconsinlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

Yeah, but the judge may very well give him more at a future hearing.

The jury was wrong to give him this amoral victory.


33 posted on 04/02/2009 4:14:03 PM PDT by DannyTN (Impeach and Deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto

Took the dumb jury 2 days to come up with this brilliant verdict, bunch of idiots. And in other news, Jay Cutler is being traded to the Chicago Bears.


34 posted on 04/02/2009 4:14:26 PM PDT by Pondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

As a Colorado resident .... BOOOOOOOO. Jury should have awarded CU the combined total salary that this FRAUD soaked out of the school system while he was present.


35 posted on 04/02/2009 4:15:27 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

“Denver Chief District Judge Larry Naves will decide in a separate hearing whether the former Boulder professor can return to his job or receive pay for years he could have worked at CU. “

Farther down in the article.


36 posted on 04/02/2009 4:19:39 PM PDT by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pondo; george76

Sounds like it was $0.00 for pain and suffering and $1.00 for lost wages. That might be game, set, match for him and Lane.


37 posted on 04/02/2009 4:20:29 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

I’m more than ready for Texas to seceed!


38 posted on 04/02/2009 4:20:33 PM PDT by lonestar (Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

OK when does Senator Frankin take office and where do we go to get the Mark of the Beast? It looks like its about that time. Let’s loot and pillage Baby!!


39 posted on 04/02/2009 4:21:13 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jo Nuvark

No, not a joke - read the article. The jury asked the judge if it was possible to find for Churchill and award him $0 in compensation.

The judge told them basically “no, you must give him a minimum of $1 if you are going to find in favor.”

This is the jury’s way of slapping Churchill in the face. It is 100% certain that he will find out that they WANTED to give him ZERO in compensation, and know from it that they all thought him a complete POS.

What the jury ALSO effectively did is prevent Churchill from launching into a continuous cycle of appeals, abusing the courts and costing the University further monies.

They found in his favour - he cannot appeal that. Nor can he appeal the monetary award. The jurors very smartly (IMHO)prevented any further legal actions from this phony indian.

Not an “OJ jury” by ANY stretch of the imagination.

A.A.C.


40 posted on 04/02/2009 4:22:24 PM PDT by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
What the hell is the matter with the law?

As I have been saying, the law as practised is intrinsically corrupt. It is not correctible in its present form. No one wants to hear it, but the days of "a nation of laws" are long gone.

41 posted on 04/02/2009 4:23:18 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady

I don’t think so, the $1.00 was for lost wages it seems. $0.00 damages. I think the judge might just “get it”.


42 posted on 04/02/2009 4:23:25 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
In most civil rights cases a successful claimant can be awarded attorneys fees.
43 posted on 04/02/2009 4:24:03 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Oh my God, am I hoping for change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AmericanArchConservative

See post #21


44 posted on 04/02/2009 4:26:45 PM PDT by San Jacinto (gorebull warming -- the Socialists' Shortcut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Pondo

Anothr jury of sheeple.


45 posted on 04/02/2009 4:26:49 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (What did Obama's Teleprompter know, and when did it know it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
What the hell is the matter with the law?

Simple. Our justice system has been replaced by "the legal industry".
46 posted on 04/02/2009 4:28:16 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
What the hell is the matter with the law?

Pretty simple:

When you're suing, your're claiming to have been damaged economically. The jury can't say "you're right", by finding in your favor, then turn around and say "you're wrong" by giving you nothing. If they want to say "you're wrong", they need to find for the guy you're suing.

47 posted on 04/02/2009 4:29:49 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg ("the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs" - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I think you may just own that patent.

Yeah, I know, but the company was too stupid to take real advantage of the technology (in favor of my prior invention) because they were afraid of it (they said it was too sophisticated for their O&M people; in reality it was too sophisticated for management :-). I told them, up front, if they didn't pursue it, they'd be broke in five years because the high material cost of the older technology would create a market opening for the Chinese. They had 60% market share so they blew me off. I built the first unit, proved that it worked, and quit.

They hired a Belgian engineering firm to try to duplicate the principles. The Belgian engineers got a bad case of NIH and failed. The managers had too much pride to hire me as a consultant and the firm that built the unit refused to make another system without me (there's nothing quite like treating prototype metal workers and machinists like the artists they are). The managers were stuck.

Five years later, they went bust because the Chinese had taken over the market. The new technology machine ran the entire time, 24/7, 350dpy without a hitch.

48 posted on 04/02/2009 4:30:51 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (From Messiah to Massah in one swell foop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

No I am afraid it isn’t a joke. But that low life pig sucker Churchhill is a joke. I live close enough to Boulder that I would be happy to go down there the day his American hateing,Terrorist arse kissing carcuss shows up on the CU campus. I have a nice huge bucket of pig guts and slop ready to poor on that Islamic loving, pig farming dirt bag.


49 posted on 04/02/2009 4:32:53 PM PDT by Buffalowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AmericanArchConservative

Well, only sorta. He has appeal rights from the restitution hearing.


50 posted on 04/02/2009 4:35:56 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg ("the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs" - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson