Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attacking The Tea Party Movement
Townhall ^ | April 7, 2009 | Lorie Byrd

Posted on 04/06/2009 11:33:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I will be attending the Annapolis, MD tea party on 4/15/09. I was split between attending the DC tea party or the MD tea party because I live in MD but very close to DC. I decided on MD since it is my state and my vote here is for both national and local representation.

I have never attended a political rally in my life and I am between the age of 30 - 40. This appears to me as the beginning of a vocal movement, but I don't expect too much of a turn out in Annapolis since MD is so very left wing. I will be bringing a video camera to the event for documentation purposes and I suggest that everyone else does the same. Record the events not only to help spread the word but for protection as well.
41 posted on 04/07/2009 5:40:33 AM PDT by cameraman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
How can a Congress with a 13% approval rating, return with a 90% incumbency rate?

Educating voters is important because not only will they vote smarter, they'll start to understand just how widespread and insidious vote fraud has become in this nation. Liberal Democrats have to cheat to win for one reason: the majority rejects them.

Vote fraud is the elephant in the room, the big nasty, the thing so uncomfortable to ponder that we all rationalize that it must be something easier to stomach, like uneducated voters. And no doubt voters are uneducated.

But that statistic above of low approval yet high incumbency isn't from stupid voters and certainly isn't because of apathetic Americans who didn't vote. It's a symptom indicating organized vote fraud and the many variations of vote manipulation used by liberal Democrats -- registering and casting votes for the elderly and mentally instable, recruiting felons and illegals to vote and bussing them places to do it, and gerrymandering districts in a way that the Liberal politician's constituency is wildly distorted and empowered.

An example: the district that is a mile or two wide by about 100 miles long of some off the most beautiful coastline in the world, from Malibu to Hearst Castle, along the California coast, giving the wealthy, artsy, mostly retired liberals who live in that very exclusive zone badly exaggerated representation in California, an overwhelmingly RED rural and agricultural state except for the coastal counties, to the ridiculously liberal big spender socialist congresswoman Lois Capps. It may not be vote fraud, but it's awfully close. Democrats have to cheat in these ways because the majority rejects them. We all need to remember it.

The MSM isn't what put Obama in the White House -- vote fraud did. What the MSM has done is skew reporting and indulge bias in order to convice people like us that it couldn't have been vote fraud because Obama and Liberals are popular enough to merit the votes. But we must be in the majority, otherwise Democrats wouldn't have to cheat to win.

Polite conservative society doesn't acknowledge vote fraud as the major factor because it's just too distasteful and the fight would be too ugly and nasty and there would be charges of *gasp* sour grapes and bad sportsmanship, and we can't have that! So instead, polite conservatives and Republicans blame it on the MSM because it's much safer and, indirectly, correct. But even if the MSM was out of the picture, vote fraud would continue to gin the votes to put these clowns in office.

If we want to get our country back, vote fraud must be called out and faced down.

42 posted on 04/07/2009 9:23:59 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Finny
I understand what you are saying. We saw and experienced vote fraud in Ohio last November. The RNC tried to stop it. Court several times. And the corruption is too deep and the SOS to stubborn(?).

She is being rewarded with Voinovich’s seat.

43 posted on 04/07/2009 9:34:53 AM PDT by EBH (The world is a balance between good & evil, your next choice will tip the scale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A true sign that the “tea parties” are WORKING.


44 posted on 04/07/2009 11:45:30 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSteff

...That is why you have Viking Kittes, to ZOT them.


45 posted on 04/07/2009 11:47:36 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Leftists are all Che wannabes -

they would just LOVE to put anyone that disagrees with them “to the wall”.

The problem, lefties, is that we’re armed, and we WILL resist.


46 posted on 04/07/2009 11:56:13 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EBH
"How can a Congress with a 13% approval rating, return with a 90% incumbency rate?"

Umm... Massive Vote Fraud?

Just a guess.

47 posted on 04/07/2009 12:31:49 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EBH
” No incumbents return to Washington DC after 2010.”

Every time someone tries this the Republicans are the ones who go down in flames. The Dems will vote their own back in and the Republicans DON”T.

Happened here in PA and the Republicans lost big... the Dems grabbed seats. The Dems saw it as a chance to gain an did.

Dem voters don't care about crooked politicians.. the just care about winning. To make an all encompassing statement like “No incumbents return to Washington DC after 2010” means Republicans lose big.

There need to be a better way to do it than just limiting with a generalized statement like that will not work for Republicans or Conservatives.

48 posted on 04/07/2009 12:55:07 PM PDT by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EBH
” No incumbents return to Washington DC after 2010.”

Every time someone tries this the Republicans are the ones who go down in flames. The Dems will vote their own back in and the Republicans DON”T.

Happened here in PA and the Republicans lost big... the Dems grabbed seats. The Dems saw it as a chance to gain an did.

Dem voters don't care about crooked politicians.. the just care about winning. To make an all encompassing statement like “No incumbents return to Washington DC after 2010” means Republicans lose big.

There need to be a better way to do it than just limiting with a generalized statement like that will not work for Republicans or Conservatives.

49 posted on 04/07/2009 12:55:12 PM PDT by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl
“Umm... Massive Vote Fraud?”

Or Philly. Often dems there win in election with 110% + of the population of a precinct voting Dem!! Really!

Then again Philly is home to Rendell. That probably makes sense now.

50 posted on 04/07/2009 1:00:20 PM PDT by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“Leftists are all Che wannabes”

You mean closet Homosexuals like Che was?


51 posted on 04/07/2009 1:03:43 PM PDT by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SF_Redux
“why don't you people think before knee jerking your way into ulcers”

Spoken like a true Dem plant! Good job. :-)

FR “membership” doesn't have expiration rule's that I am aware of.

By the way it is not ulcer causing it is fun.

But thanks for “outing” yourself.

:-)

52 posted on 04/07/2009 1:11:52 PM PDT by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

53 posted on 04/07/2009 1:47:42 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeTurnedRebel
...lets organize something that will really get O’s attention.

Like millions of us not filing tax returns, or better yet burning them at every post office around the country on Apr 15th?

Because that my FRiend would get their attention!

54 posted on 04/07/2009 1:53:06 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
But thanks for “outing” yourself.

LOLOL... there you go 007

thanks for making my point

55 posted on 04/07/2009 2:47:20 PM PDT by SF_Redux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

Here is a movement that has been gaining traction, Alarm and Muster - The Modern Day Call Tree for Emergency Preparation.”

How do we know it’s not a front for the govt.?
I have no doubt that the govt. knows who and where most of us are and every time someone posts a pic of their new rifle or how much ammo they have it goes in the file.No tiny bit of info is too trivial for the govt. to archive.
I have no doubt that there are plants in FR also.
I read at another website,a poster saying he has been here since the beginning and he is trusted, but he is a spy.


56 posted on 04/07/2009 4:10:02 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SF_Redux
LOL is right. Good exchange maxwell smart. LOL
57 posted on 04/07/2009 6:55:16 PM PDT by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SF_Redux
I signed up here in 99', and signed off last year because I was tired of seeing kneee jerkers dominating and chastizing anyone who joined that they didn't "personally know" I signed back up last week and the very first post I made was attacked in the same way I just described, like a bunch of jr hs kids trying to take over this place

You haven't put your previous 10 year name on your current home page, who have you been posting as before you were banned?

58 posted on 07/24/2009 12:01:41 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson