Skip to comments.
Implications of Polonium Radiohalos in Nested Plutons of the Tuolumne Intrusive Suite, Yosemite, CA
AiG ^
| April 8, 2009
| Dr. Andrew Snelling and Dallel Gates
Posted on 04/09/2009 8:42:27 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Implications of Polonium Radiohalos in Nested Plutons of the Tuolumne Intrusive Suite, Yosemite, California
by Dr. Andrew Snelling and Dallel Gates
April 8, 2009
Abstract
The formation of granite plutons has conventionally been thought to be a slow process requiring millions of years from generation to cooling. Even though new mechanisms for rapid emplacement of plutons have now been proposed, radioisotope dating still dominates and dictates long timescales for pluton formation. However, a new challenge to those long timescales has arisen from radiohalos. Polonium radiohalos found in biotite flakes of granites in Yosemite National Park place severe time constraints on the formation and cooling of the granite plutons due to the short half-lives of the polonium isotopes. The biotite flakes must have formed and cooled below 150ºC before the polonium supply was exhausted and the radiohalos could be preserved, so the U decay had to be grossly accelerated and the formation of the plutons had to be within 610 days. Furthermore, rapid cooling of the plutons was facilitated by the hydrothermal fluid convection that rapidly generated the Po radiohalos, challenging conventional thinking that cooling is a slow process by conduction. It is evident that there were greater volumes of hydrothermal fluids in the later central intrusions of the nested plutons of the Tuolumne Intrusive Suite. So as expected, more Po radiohalos were generated in these plutons as they were sequentially intruded, confirming the hydrothermal fluid transport model for Po radiohalo formation. Thus granite pluton formation is consistent with the timescale of a young earth, and accelerated radioisotope decay renders the absolute ages for these granite plutons grossly in error...
(Excerpt) Read more at answersingenesis.org ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: accelerated; acceleratedudecay; creation; emplacement; evolution; explosivevolcanism; fluids; goodgodimnutz; granite; hydrothermal; hydrothermalfluids; intelligentdesign; intrusive; magma; magmacooling; nestedplutons; plutons; poloniumradiohalos; sequential; tuolumne; udecay; yosemite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-81 next last
To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...
This one is technical...but very interesting IMHO
To: GodGunsGuts
um. *scratches head*
thats all scientology to me.
3
posted on
04/09/2009 8:44:29 AM PDT
by
GeronL
To: Ira_Louvin
Since you are sending me links, I thought I’d send you one :o)
To: GodGunsGuts
I traded all my plutons for candy and gum when I was a kid.
It’s one of the great regrets of my life. No more plutons for me... (SIGH).
5
posted on
04/09/2009 8:45:49 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: GodGunsGuts
The biotite flakes must have formed and cooled below 150ºC before the polonium supply was exhausted and the radiohalos could be preserved, so the U decay had to be grossly accelerated and the formation of the plutons had to be within 610 days. Well ... duh!
6
posted on
04/09/2009 8:46:25 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(American Revolution II -- overdue)
To: GeronL
I don’t blame you at all!
To: GodGunsGuts
To: ClearCase_guy
It’s like sooooooo obvious!
To: GodGunsGuts
You know, I’ve been wondering about this for a long time.
To: ClearCase_guy
? placemarker
11
posted on
04/09/2009 8:48:14 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: Darteaus94025
I have a feeling you will still be wondering long after this thread has past :o)
To: GodGunsGuts
The biotite flakes must have formed and cooled below 150ºC before the polonium supply was exhausted and the radiohalos could be preserved, so the U decay had to be grossly accelerated and the formation of the plutons had to be within 610 days.Well du-uh.
13
posted on
04/09/2009 8:49:34 AM PDT
by
Maceman
To: GodGunsGuts
When do I get to Obama in this um....article?
14
posted on
04/09/2009 8:50:09 AM PDT
by
dforest
To: GeronL
um. *scratches head* thats all scientology to me. I am still trying to decipher the headline!
15
posted on
04/09/2009 8:51:39 AM PDT
by
calex59
To: GodGunsGuts
My hat’s off to you if your understand what you posted, I sure as heck don’t! LOL
16
posted on
04/09/2009 8:53:04 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(Trow da' bum out!)
To: GeronL
If I had really been on my best game I would have said, “So simple a caveman could understand it!”.
17
posted on
04/09/2009 8:53:42 AM PDT
by
calex59
To: calex59; All
The REAL question is why did we all decide to open this thread and read it..???
18
posted on
04/09/2009 8:54:09 AM PDT
by
ken5050
(Obama wants a 900% tax on Aspirin. Why, you ask? It's white, and it works...)
To: indylindy
It is a monument to precisely where Obama does not want science to go!
To: GodGunsGuts
“Implications of POLONIUM RADIOHALOS in Nested PLUTONS of the TUOLOMNE Intrusive Suite, Yosemite, CA”
Wha’d you call me?
20
posted on
04/09/2009 8:55:58 AM PDT
by
FreeSouthernAmerican
(All we ask is to be let alone----Jefferson Davis)
To: FreeSouthernAmerican
I saw halos, maybe the authors are calling you an angel :o)
To: calex59
I understand and have a reply-Klaatu Barada Nikto
To: GodGunsGuts
Can you break it down for me brotha?
23
posted on
04/09/2009 8:58:55 AM PDT
by
dforest
To: calex59
a caveman would have hit you on the head with a club -o)
24
posted on
04/09/2009 8:59:48 AM PDT
by
GeronL
To: GodGunsGuts
Definitely ABOVE my pay grade.
25
posted on
04/09/2009 8:59:59 AM PDT
by
granite
To: GodGunsGuts
I saw Radiohalos and thought they were talking about Rush during Holy Week.
My bad.
26
posted on
04/09/2009 9:00:54 AM PDT
by
TYVets
To: GodGunsGuts
Scientific proof of Creationism. Cool.
To: GodGunsGuts
The author doesn’t know me very well then. HAHAHA. I try, but its unsuccessful most of the time.
28
posted on
04/09/2009 9:03:07 AM PDT
by
FreeSouthernAmerican
(All we ask is to be let alone----Jefferson Davis)
To: GodGunsGuts
“The world could’ve been made 6,000 years ago. Really, it could’ve...I’m not kidding! Stop laughing! This is not a joke!”
To: indylindy
The superduper condensed version:
The Evos say granites take millions of years to form, these scientists present evidence that granites form VERY rapidly (i.e. years to tens of years).
To: dighton; martin_fierro; Tijeras_Slim; Constitution Day; Larry Lucido
..more Po radiohalos were generated in these plutons as they were sequentially intruded, confirming the hydrothermal fluid transport model for Po radiohalo formation...This ought to put the lie once and for all to all those blindered, stiffnecked, Philistine claims about non-sequential pluton intrusion.
31
posted on
04/09/2009 9:05:00 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
To: GodGunsGuts
This is like so....way beyond my paygrade!
32
posted on
04/09/2009 9:05:28 AM PDT
by
montomike
(Politics should be about service and not a lucrative, money-making opportunity!)
To: ken5050
Is this article about the stuff Bugs stopped Marvin from using to blow up the earth?
33
posted on
04/09/2009 9:07:35 AM PDT
by
VRWCtaz
(President Palin sure is going to have her work cut out for her.)
To: GodGunsGuts
I don’t think that this is exactly new info.
I recall a discussion with a physicist from LRL Livermore, back around 1991 or 92, where he contended that the cooling had to have been complete in seconds, or the halos could not have formed.
34
posted on
04/09/2009 9:08:41 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: TheOldLady
“creationism”
No, no, no. It’s called `Intelligent Design’.
And I don’t go to the ‘hopper’. I visit my `Fortress of
Solitude’ where I sit and ponder matters of great import.
Like “plutons”.
35
posted on
04/09/2009 9:09:25 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(With utmost delication and self-abasement, I find myself sufficiently cognizant of the geo-chronolog)
To: GodGunsGuts
Nothing like a big bowl of biotite flakes to start the your day!
36
posted on
04/09/2009 9:11:33 AM PDT
by
Clioman
To: indylindy
"
When do I get to Obama in this um....article?" That would be when he bows to kiss the Saudi king's plut-on...
37
posted on
04/09/2009 9:12:32 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: GodGunsGuts
Big deal. We get nested plutons around here every Spring.
|
38
posted on
04/09/2009 9:17:09 AM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(This post is made of 100% recycled electrons)
To: Clioman
"
Nothing like a big bowl of biotite flakes to start the your day!" Very crunchy, and they never become soggy in the milk!
39
posted on
04/09/2009 9:17:21 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: GodGunsGuts
The Evos say granites take millions of years to form, these scientists present evidence that granites form VERY rapidly (i.e. years to tens of years).For this to be evidence of a young Earth, you have to disregard everything but granite, and find the same evidence in all the other granite.
40
posted on
04/09/2009 9:17:32 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: GodGunsGuts
If it sounds stupid, it probably is.
The earth is NOT 4000 years old.
41
posted on
04/09/2009 9:27:13 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: indylindy
He is saying this proves the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
42
posted on
04/09/2009 9:32:30 AM PDT
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: GodGunsGuts
“so the U decay had to be grossly accelerated”
Notice the totally lack of evidence for accelerated atomic decay?
43
posted on
04/09/2009 9:33:33 AM PDT
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: GodGunsGuts
I understood “of,” “and,” and “the.”
To: DevNet
45
posted on
04/09/2009 9:34:48 AM PDT
by
dforest
To: DevNet
I suspect the writer doesn’t even know where Polonium is on the Periodic Table.
46
posted on
04/09/2009 9:35:37 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: Zathras
I suspect the writer doesnt even know where Polonium is on the Periodic Table. Polonium is between Germanium and Ukranium and south of Scandium isn't it?
;-)
47
posted on
04/09/2009 9:42:52 AM PDT
by
Jonah Hex
("Never underestimate the hungover side of the Force.")
To: GodGunsGuts
The first paragraph discourages further reading, but I LOVE the title!
48
posted on
04/09/2009 9:43:24 AM PDT
by
MainFrame65
(The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!.)
To: GodGunsGuts
“Plutons” isn’t that what Mickey Mouse had to pick up after his dog had been in the yard awhile?
49
posted on
04/09/2009 9:46:12 AM PDT
by
techcor
(I hope Obama succeeds... in becoming a one term president.)
To: GodGunsGuts
“The biotite flakes must have formed and cooled below 150ºC before the polonium supply was exhausted and the radiohalos could be preserved, so the U decay had to be grossly accelerated and the formation of the plutons had to be within 610 days.”
Stunning!
50
posted on
04/09/2009 9:46:29 AM PDT
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson