Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dog Legislation Attacks Property Rights
I am the writer | 4/10/09 | John Yates

Posted on 04/10/2009 11:33:42 AM PDT by eaglerock814

Dog Legislation On Brink In Eight States

Ohio, California, Indiana, Texas, Delaware, Washington, Oklahoma And Tennessee

Legislation that would severely restrict the ability to raise high quality purebred dogs in a home environment is advancing rapidly in several states:

· In Ohio, new legislation was introduced this week that defines a breeding dog as any dog that is not spayed or neutered, and creates a new state Kennel Authority with the power to write and enforce regulations without legislative oversight.

· In California, the 13th reincarnation of last year’s failed bill to mandate spaying and neutering of all dogs faces a hearing before the Senate Local Government Committee on April 15. This bill would force the sterilization of any dog that is accused of being in violation of any animal law, even if the allegation is not proven.

· In Indiana, legislation that defines many serious hobbyists as “puppy mills” has passed both the House and Senate, faces a conference committee to resolve differences. Similar legislation is moving quickly in Washington and Oklahoma. While dog owners working with the American Sporting Dog Alliance have caused amendments to improve all three bills, the results still fall short of protecting our rights.

· Texas breeding legislation continues to be contained in committee, but animal rights groups are lobbying hard and a major push by dog owners is needed to make sure it stays in committee.

· And Tennessee legislation aimed at people who raise dogs is moving fast in both houses of the Legislature, and a hearing on similar legislation in Delaware was postponed after dog owners working with the American Sporting Dog Alliance filed strong objections.

To read the full report, please open the following link: http://eaglerock814.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=34

Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: animals; hsus; property; rights

1 posted on 04/10/2009 11:33:42 AM PDT by eaglerock814
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eaglerock814

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr!


2 posted on 04/10/2009 11:34:52 AM PDT by meandog (The only "Bush" sounding surname worth a damn belongs to NASCAR's Kurt&Kyle Busch--not GEORGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: admin; eaglerock814

Breaking News????


3 posted on 04/10/2009 11:35:20 AM PDT by Born In America ("O.B.A.M.A.: One Big A** Mistake, America....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born In America

It is a fourth amendment issue. I’d love to see this go as a 4A case to the Supreme Court.


4 posted on 04/10/2009 11:39:47 AM PDT by coydog (Proud to have slept through the Obama coronation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eaglerock814

Oh, here we f’n go again!

Pretty soon, only the “elites” will have dogs, and only the International Fraternity of Domesticated Canine Society will be able to supply them.


5 posted on 04/10/2009 11:41:44 AM PDT by papasmurf (Guns didn't make America unsafe, Courts and Congress did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eaglerock814
Say goodbye to...

That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

Everyday, I'm seeing more and more from our Gov't. that leads me to believe that our Constitution, et al, means nothing anymore.
6 posted on 04/10/2009 11:46:52 AM PDT by papasmurf (Guns didn't make America unsafe, Courts and Congress did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eaglerock814
Puppy mills need to be closed and owning a breeding dog needs to be licensed.
7 posted on 04/10/2009 12:06:36 PM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Puppy mills need to be closed and owning a breeding dog needs to be licensed

True but there is no need to use the bill of rights as toilet paper,and the animals rights nutters are using the puppy mill issue to shut down legitimate breeders

8 posted on 04/10/2009 12:14:18 PM PDT by Charlespg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Charlespg
Has nothing to do with bill of rights, people do not have the right to trash up the place, turning your animals lose to breed whenever and where ever, places the expense of the clean up on the tax payer.
9 posted on 04/10/2009 12:24:09 PM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

They way it sounds, it is directed at any one with a breeding (able to breed) dog - a dog that is not spayed or neutered. That includes the family pet that you might want to let have a litter of puppies someday. Around here family and friends are the first to take the puppies.
I’ve had a number of dogs in my life time - and all were free. Our Pomeranian was free too - we rescued him from a neglectful owner.
If this spreads and becomes law I may have to buy only a pure bred from an expensive breeder.


10 posted on 04/10/2009 12:24:20 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Puppy mills need to be closed and owning a breeding dog needs to be licensed.

And nothing would be better than to have people of your ilk define both, right?

Have you read any of these bills or are you strictly a knee-jerk proponent?

11 posted on 04/10/2009 1:25:24 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The Democrats want nationalized health care? I'll take the coverage Congress has. Nothing less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
No I'm tied of seeing peta killing them and my having to pay for it.
12 posted on 04/10/2009 3:48:26 PM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eaglerock814

ALL “licensing” type legislation works to curtail Liberty and establish “approved” cartels.

Whereas, very simple laws already exist that try to define “animal abuse” and, when given the resources to investigate and prosecute, help weed out the bad apples.

The real issue seems to me not one of needing new laws, which by design will restrict Liberty, but one of enforcing existing laws.


13 posted on 04/10/2009 3:55:29 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson