Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sick Canadian Newborn Whose Parents Want To Use as a Heart Donor Not Terminal
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | Thursday April 9, 2009 | By Hilary White

Posted on 04/10/2009 12:01:03 PM PDT by preciousbabies

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: preciousbabies

They wanted their baby to die because of APNEA?!?!?!

Heaven forbid these Nazis ever find out that most of my family has apnea in some form, they’ll be demanding we be killed to put an end to our “suffering”.


21 posted on 04/10/2009 3:20:58 PM PDT by Ellendra (Can't starve us out, and you can't make us run...Country folks CAN survive!!! -Hank Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: preciousbabies
"Oh the parent's disappointment their child isn't 100% perfect JUST LIKE THEM, the shock , the horror!"

The real horror will occur when men stand before the ultimate judge and discover just how imperfect they are.
22 posted on 04/10/2009 4:10:28 PM PDT by ThomasSawyer (Democratic Underground: Proof that anyone can figure out how to use a computer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: preciousbabies
This is NOT an untreatable condition and what is happening here should scare everyone for Obamacare.... for as you can see here it is all about cost... read the last paragraph in this attachment

http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics%3B111/4/914

snip....

Significant new information has been forthcoming in recent decades on sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and apnea during early infancy.1–8 This statement focuses on the epidemiologic aspects of SIDS, the lack of a proven association between episodic apnea and SIDS, strategies for prevention of SIDS, and appropriate use of home cardiorespiratory monitoring.

Apnea monitors were first introduced in the mid-1960s for the management of apnea of prematurity in hospital settings.9 Subsequently, cardiorespiratory monitoring has become widely used in the care of infants with a variety of acute and chronic disorders.

The hypothesis that apnea is the pathophysiologic precursor to SIDS was first proposed in 1972.10 Apnea documented by cardiorespiratory monitoring during prolonged hospitalizations was reported for 2 infants, both of whom were siblings of 3 infants who had died suddenly at home. Both siblings subsequently died unexpectedly after discharge from the hospital. More than 2 decades later, evidence of infanticide for all 5 infants in the original report became known. The apnea theory never has been proven despite extensive independent research in the several decades after that report.1–5 Nevertheless, the home cardiorespiratory monitoring industry, fueled by increasing demand from parents concerned about the risk of SIDS, rapidly developed products aimed at preventing SIDS.11 Despite the absence of a scientific foundation or evidence of efficacy,12,13 home cardiorespiratory monitoring continues to be a common practice in this country.

The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infant and Preschool Child in 1975 recommended that home monitoring to prevent SIDS should be limited to ongoing research studies.14 Subsequently, in the early 1980s a Task Force on Prolonged Infantile Apnea was formed to evaluate the evidence for the theory that apnea is a precursor to SIDS. It concluded in a 1985 statement that "a causal relationship between prolonged apnea and SIDS has not been established."15 The recommendations left the use of home cardiorespiratory monitoring in individual situations to physician judgment.

The costs of home monitoring are substantial. In 1999, 44% of 26 000 infants weighing 501 to 1500 g at birth and cared for in 325 neonatal units within the Vermont Oxford Network were discharged from the hospital on monitors.16 A conservative estimate of the annual cost of monitoring preterm infants weighing less than 1500 g in the United States is $24 million, and this projection does not include physician fees, repeat pneumograms or sleep studies, other ancillary medical costs, or the costs of other populations of infants who are monitored. In this context, the question of efficacy of home monitoring becomes even more important.

23 posted on 04/10/2009 4:10:44 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Read my post #23 above, I go with it being cost and socialized medicine


24 posted on 04/10/2009 4:13:03 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: preciousbabies
Pinged from Terri Dailies


25 posted on 04/11/2009 4:32:12 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson