Skip to comments.
COURT DENIES LESBIAN PARTNER PARENTAL RIGHTS
New York Post ^
| April 10, 2009
Posted on 04/10/2009 6:40:40 PM PDT by nickcarraway
A New York state appeals court has ruled that a lesbian whose partner gave birth to a boy after their Vermont civil union has no parental rights because she never legally adopted the child.
The Appellate Division denied the petition by Debra H. for joint legal and physical custody after she and Janice R. broke up.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; lesbians; lesbonazi; queers
To: nickcarraway
2
posted on
04/10/2009 6:49:02 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: nickcarraway
Finally!
Cheers!
...and Happy Good Friday!
3
posted on
04/10/2009 7:00:08 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: nickcarraway
To: Chode
THE FDRQ LOSE ONE! YEA!!!!!!!
5
posted on
04/10/2009 8:06:15 PM PDT
by
Morgana
("OBAMA" acronym One Big Ass Mistake, America)
To: nickcarraway
I guess it never dawned on this woman that she can go have a baby on her own? Like maybe if she hooked up with some man.......or even a turkey baster?
6
posted on
04/10/2009 8:13:57 PM PDT
by
Morgana
("OBAMA" acronym One Big Ass Mistake, America)
To: nickcarraway
"A New York state appeals court has ruled that a lesbian whose partner gave birth to a boy after their Vermont civil union has no parental rights because she never legally adopted the child."
Note bene this issue has nothing whatsoever to do with gay "rights."
7
posted on
04/10/2009 8:52:15 PM PDT
by
Soprano
(Remember when dissent was patriotic?)
To: Morgana
That’s way too logical, intelligent and rational an answer for the lesbonazi crowd.
To: nickcarraway
......A glimpse of sanity,perhaps?
9
posted on
04/10/2009 9:02:49 PM PDT
by
massmike
To: nickcarraway
...and two months after the women registered as domestic partners in New York City.Only 2 months? Does this mean the other woman wasn't the father?
To: Morgana
one... better than none.
11
posted on
04/11/2009 6:26:41 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
To: nickcarraway
This is the right way. It is the same as if the mother was living with a man who did not father the child. There are no rights being trampled here, in fact, they're protecting the child's rights to a biological mother and father.
Now, if the "partner" wants to adopt the child and the mother agrees, then we have something interesting - what is in the best interest of the child? that's how it should be decided.
12
posted on
04/11/2009 12:37:48 PM PDT
by
jeffc
(They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson