There you go again, demonstrating the article's description is a close fit. You may find a loophole or so in it because it's in you nature to find fault, but that's the whole point.
I'm too stupid to get it, but you with your superior intelligence, pointed out that I am wrong.
You fit that description much better than you want to believe.
Okay, let’s be specific, because as long as you don’t have a particular target you will never have to admit you missed.
What legislation do you expect to have enacted or repealed as a result of this heroic effort I keep poo-pooing? Judicial appointments? Regulatory changes? Bureaucracies toppled? Editorial policies?
Give me something, anything, by which we can measure your success or failure in influencing government and/or the press.