To: tacticalogic
I'm not sure what you are referring to. But there is a big difference between using a graphic to illustrate, and using a graphic for propaganda purposes. You can also use a graphic as evidence, such as the graphic I posted above illustrating the overt racism of Darwin propagandist, Earnst Haekel.
To: GodGunsGuts
One man's "illustration" is another man's "propaganda".
My disagreement with using them in a debate is that I consider it a coward's tactic. You don't have to defend what you're saying if you never really said anything.
10 posted on
04/11/2009 9:54:59 AM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson