Replies

Ok, this is the one and only graph in , pray tell, where is the data to back up those data points on Darwood's so-called "Tree of Life"???

There is plenty of other observational data. Not all data is graphical.

Funny thing, dearth of "evidence" aside - Darwin was still right!

And which of those articles that you pictured but clearly didn't read debunked Evolution and "proved" or even supported creationism?

And now that the have discovered that the genome is at least 93% functional (as opposed 97% "junk" as the Evos predicted), that is going to throw all the Evo's phylogenetic trees that supposedly show common ancestry into complete disarray. Indeed, that is one of the reasons the Evos themselves are finally being forced to cut down darwood's tree (just as creationists have been predicting all along). LOL!!!

Which, again, does nothing to disprove Evolution - even with your falsifications.

So now you admit that Darwood was faced with a “dearth of evidence” when he dishonestly decided to push forward with his materialist creation myth. If I didn’t know any better I might think you’re starting to make some progress. But then you had to go against your own better judgment and declare that Darwood was “right” anyway. Ok, I’ll bite, give me the top three reasons why you think Darwood was “right”, despite the “dearth” of supporting evidence, and despite the mountain of falsifying evidence to the contrary.

==Which, again, does nothing to disprove Evolution - even with your falsifications.

So your saying the fact that the creationists and IDers made the correct prediction re: “junk” DNA, and the fact that the Evo’s prediction about the same turned out to be dead wrong, says nothing about the neo-Darwoodian ToE’s power to make accurate predictions?