It’s one of the two things I look forward to each Friday on the web. The WSJ crossword is the other.
MS is the greatest. But I don't get this assertion. I think the Hitler comparison is apt. We need to get over the idea that Hitler was a freak of nature. He was merely a modern demonstration of Original Sin given political power. Stalin, Mao, the Aztecs, and Pol Pot were no better. Characters like this emerge throughout history with tiresome regularity. The important difference is not ideological or theologicalit's that I think Hitler was more his own man than Obambi is. (That is, unless you count the fact that HItler seems to have been possessed by the devil.)
Obomber and his people are so amateurishly aggressive and petty on so many fronts that he seems barely to be in control of the show. It's like there's a money-bags behind Obama, pushing the main progression toward national bankruptcy and government takeover. And then there are ideologue advisors raising up a cacaphony of hate while Obomber tries to throw each one a little red meat every so often. He doesn't quite seem in charge. Do I think he'd go in for the cattle-car thing? I see nothing in his philosophy, particularly in his respect for political opponents or for human life, that would make me say no.
53% think their taxes are fair or too low...interesting. That’s about as many that don’t pay taxes. What percentage of taxpayers think their taxes are fair is the real question. Does this mean 53% would support a fair tax? I bet the other 47% would too.