Posted on 04/20/2009 9:59:17 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Perez Hilton: "Let me explain to you. She lost not because she doesn't believe in gay marriage. Miss California lost because she is a dumb b-tch."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.tv ...
Perez Hilton: Bringing class, sophistication and intellect to the Miss USA pageant. May as well have sat a 1st grader down in that judging seat. Probably would have gotten a lot less emotion and a lot more reason in the way it was judged.
What am I missing, bro? Did you mean to post something more than the same pic I posted (only scaled down a little smaller)?
Gay===Happy in a QUEER sort of way.
Interestingly, they aren’t to fond of “homosexual” either. “Nice, smart people with good taste” appears to be their chosen moniker. As you put it, stupid queers.
manboobs site is down.
wonder why?
I read somewhere that there was a mixture of applause and boos. I didn’t hear any boos.
She’s “stupid” because she won’t buy into the “Emperor’s New Clothes” world of the homosexuals? Sounds like she’s infinitely smarter than Perez and his friends.
This woman would have won the contest if they didn’t plant this question and more importantly the homosexual activist judge.
The real story is how did they plant a homosexual activist judge in a beauty pagaent? Very odd, there’s a real story in there.
Question: Why would they let a queer judge a Miss U.S.A. contest. You know that he will favor the girls with hairy legs and no boobs.
NBC is NBC - a gay-loving, Constitution-hating (except for part of the 1st Amendment), conservative-bashing TV network (along with its cable clones). The proper question is who allowed a lovely girl like that lower herself to a beauty competition on NBC? Somebody was either naive or not thinking or both.
Ah, I see. It sure does.
Hmmmmm....That's a very interesting theory. And any woman who actually has curves is called "fat".
I think you may be on to something.
See liberals. See how liberals are mean, vicious, angry hate-filled bigots.
Perez likes painting himself as a reporter.
It makes me cringe when he attempts to cover anything but celeb sleeze. His comments on Sarah Palin are disgusting and he’ll report anything negative about any consevrative regardless of the story’s validity.
He’s done so numerous times.
He’s anti-communism, but isn’t smart enough to understand that his choice in Presidential candidates (Clinton first, Obama second) are commies themselves.
He’s reported twice that Fidel Castro was dead because one of his “friends” in Miami told him so.
He’s been sued by numerous other bloggers who he’s stolen pictures of off, posing them as his own.
His ego is as big as his waist line.
Long story short, the guy is a hack who got lucky enough to make money drawing coke boogers and pee stains on celebs’ pictures and his time will be up as his schtick will get old.
Supremely “Not Guilty”.
I too favor the '50s image of beauty. With those skinny girls you have to always be worried about getting paper cuts.
He is a troubled soul...yikes...i feel for him. You can tell his eyes are empty!
There’s also a dark side to the theory that I did not touch on.
The brains of young boys are being reprogrammed by commercial advertising with similarly thin models to think those boyish shapes are sexually exciting.
In turn, this is increasing the number of young boys who at least experiment with homosexuality.
As depressing as that is, it isn’t the dark side I mentioned.
Some mature men are also being reprogrammed to the same physiological response, resulting in more man-boy homosexual behavior. Some of those physiologically impressionable men, unable to accept the homosexual side of it, are choosing very young girls instead.
I see that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.