Skip to comments.
Meghan McCain: Can we ban mentioning her on FR???
4-20-2009
| fishtank
Posted on 04/20/2009 12:40:16 PM PDT by fishtank
I am getting tired of seeing daily threads about Meghan McCain almost daily on FR. I don't watch network TV, and honestly never heard of her until several weeks ago.
Could we just quit posting about her already, unless there is TRULY a news article that concerns her?????
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chat; headinthesand; justanothervanity; liberals; mccain; mccaintruthfile; mclame; mcqueeg; mcqueegjr; meggiemac; meghan247; meghanmccain; nomorerinos; ohthehughvanity; rino; rinoette; rinoparty; thisisseries; vanity; wahhh; yayanothervanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-121 next last
Would anyone mind if I hit the "abuse" button the next time there is a thread posted from the news wires about her?
Yes, this post in and of itself violates my desire, but can this be the last thread about her?
Please??
1
posted on
04/20/2009 12:40:16 PM PDT
by
fishtank
To: fishtank
I wrote “daily” twice in one sentence.
Sick, just sick.
2
posted on
04/20/2009 12:41:04 PM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
She’s not worth the trouble.
3
posted on
04/20/2009 12:41:36 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
To: fishtank
Well, I would certainly agree with you.
4
posted on
04/20/2009 12:41:36 PM PDT
by
indylindy
To: fishtank
Why not ban mentioning any of the McCains?
; )
5
posted on
04/20/2009 12:41:47 PM PDT
by
Califreak
(Obama is Swahili for "Death to America")
To: fishtank
I can’t stand Meghan. I am glad that the media doesn’t shine the light on her, then we would be in real trouble.
6
posted on
04/20/2009 12:41:52 PM PDT
by
Dacula
(You are where you are by the choices you make)
To: fishtank
I helped you out by hitting abuse on this thread.
j/k
7
posted on
04/20/2009 12:42:16 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: Perdogg; Professional Engineer; PJ-Comix; Dick Bachert; 50mm; stockpirate; Eaker; ducdriver; ...
|
|
The Meghan McCain Truth File. "I think Obama's cute." Meghan McCain, January 8, 2008 FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, meghanmccain, rinoette Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords. This can be a very high-volume ping list at times. To join the ping list: FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add mccaintruthfile. (Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.) Republican Commissars Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless RNC shills who simply want to meet a new overlord. |
|
8
posted on
04/20/2009 12:43:21 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
To: fishtank
I am getting tired of seeing daily threads about Meghan McCain almost daily on FR. I don't watch network TV, and honestly never heard of her until several weeks ago. Could we just quit posting about her already, unless there is TRULY a news article that concerns her????? Thank you! I agree 200%. Who cares about her? It's like posting Chelsea Clintons opinions every day. I don't want to give them or their ideas any exposure.
9
posted on
04/20/2009 12:43:31 PM PDT
by
DouglasKC
To: fishtank
I know we have this rule on pictures. If we MUST chat about her on here...can we forego the picture route of her? I have a delicate stomach you know...
To: fishtank
I would agree that Meghan McCain is worthless and is not worthy of any coverage here whatsoever.
11
posted on
04/20/2009 12:44:12 PM PDT
by
TommyDale
(National Crime Victims' Rights Week: April 26 - May 2, 2009)
To: mysterio
12
posted on
04/20/2009 12:44:22 PM PDT
by
hoe_cake
(A proud member of the Society of the Descendents of the Signers of the Constitution.)
To: fishtank
Can’t we just turn everyone of those threads into a ZOT thread? At least that’s amusing.
Seriously, Viking Kitties or cats firing AK-47s make me forget Meghan McCain...or at least have a good laugh.
13
posted on
04/20/2009 12:44:27 PM PDT
by
vladimir998
(Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
To: fishtank
I agree with you. She is simply a celebrity like Paris Hilton and we don’t post every word Paris says!
I say Megan should get the Vichy Chix treatment. Silence.
14
posted on
04/20/2009 12:44:34 PM PDT
by
fightinJAG
(Good riddance, UAW.)
To: fishtank
She is the Republican Party.
15
posted on
04/20/2009 12:44:43 PM PDT
by
nickcarraway
(Are the Good Times Really Over?)
To: fishtank
I have no use for Meghan McCain. I posted on a thread about her this a.m. just to make a little fun of her.
I view these type threads as more amusement than anything. And not being a fan of banning issues (I’m more than happy with banning DUmmies and their ilk), I don’t believe it’s warranted. Just ignore the threads. That’s the ticket...
16
posted on
04/20/2009 12:44:58 PM PDT
by
bcsco
(I'm a Constitution defender!)
To: fishtank
I would normally not favor a ban on any reasonable topic, but I must admit that the daily threads on this stunningly uninteresting person are getting out of hand, Perhaps the Moderators will favor us by restricting such posts to “Chat”.
17
posted on
04/20/2009 12:45:05 PM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
To: fishtank
18
posted on
04/20/2009 12:45:35 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: dfwgator
Her views are as worthless as “tits on a boar hog”.
19
posted on
04/20/2009 12:46:04 PM PDT
by
Murp
To: fishtank
don’t ban it just ignore the threads.
20
posted on
04/20/2009 12:46:09 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
To: fishtank
21
posted on
04/20/2009 12:46:10 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Do I really have to put the / sarc for you to know?)
To: fishtank
I detest Meghan but I detest much more the media, who gives her copious air time, in an attempt to split the party in two. There is no way Meghan can be this “new” conservative, which she supposedly believes in, as her beliefs are more aligned to the Democrat party. Pretty soon (if we don’t already), we’ll have two parties: the liberal Democrat (DEMOCRAT) party and the conservative Republican (dEMOCRAT) party.
To: fishtank
Maybe JimRob could do a Poll and ban her. I think ‘her people’ are spamming FR anyway as it seems to be newbies posting a lot of these articles
23
posted on
04/20/2009 12:47:03 PM PDT
by
Blogger
(It is in the religion of ignorance that tyranny begins. - Ben Franklin)
To: indylindy
>>> Well, I would certainly agree with you. <<<
I SECOND the Motion..
24
posted on
04/20/2009 12:47:43 PM PDT
by
Eagle50AE
(Pray for our Armed Forces.)
To: Dacula
I am glad that the media doesnt shine the light on herThey absolutely do. She was on in the first five minutes of last night's ABC World News tonight. Expect the media to use her more as we get get closer to Nov. 2010 as well.
To: Blogger
Like I said, she’s not worth the effort.
26
posted on
04/20/2009 12:48:22 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
To: fishtank
27
posted on
04/20/2009 12:49:25 PM PDT
by
GoCards
To: fishtank
YMeghan McCain: Can we ban mentioning her on FR???ou first! So why don't you stop posting threads which mention her?
28
posted on
04/20/2009 12:49:27 PM PDT
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: fishtank
It only requires that we not post articles about her.
Good in theory, maybe not in practice.
Instead I suggest we not make cognitive and earnest assessments of Ms. McCain. Let's flame anybody that posts articles about her; treat her like ZOT or Christine Todd Whittman.
Who can post the studidest picture on a Miss Meghan thread??
To: fishtank
“Would anyone mind if I hit the “abuse” button the next time there is a thread posted from the news wires about her? Yes, this post in and of itself violates my desire, but can this be the last thread about her? “
A-FREAKIN-MEN. I hope to never read another word about that mindless twit.
30
posted on
04/20/2009 12:49:40 PM PDT
by
Hacklehead
(Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
To: All
THANK YOU all for your great responses!!
I am also going to post THIS graphic and link for any MM post:

Rammstein - Du Hast
31
posted on
04/20/2009 12:49:42 PM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
Meghan McCain: Can we ban mentioning her on FR??? So why don't you stop posting threads which mention her?
32
posted on
04/20/2009 12:49:43 PM PDT
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: mysterio
What ever happened to the “Daily Pray for George Bush” people? Do they not need to pray for Obama also?
I go tired of their self-righteous crap like I get tired of the Applebores. Instead of their daily praying for Gw, They should have been praying for Tehran to have an earthquake so bad that the mullahs are all killed, or for the North Korean missile to malfunction and blowup killing all their tech, or how about having Kennedy, byrd, dodd, pelosi, and frank to die. Now those are worth praying for.
33
posted on
04/20/2009 12:49:47 PM PDT
by
Wooly
To: Eagle50AE
I think ignoring her would put her in the place she rightfully belongs.
To: fishtank
I agree, ban threads about her
let's ban her to her room
Better yet, out of this country.
We don't need anymore air heads in this country.
To: fishtank
I don't think you can prohibit people from posting stories about her as long as she's a useful tool for the left. She should realize that her opinions of what the Republican party should be not news worthy. The only McCains I have respect for is Cindy and her son serving in Iraq.
36
posted on
04/20/2009 12:51:19 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(I guess it all depends upon what the meaning of "bow" is.)
To: vladimir998
“Cant we just turn everyone of those threads into a ZOT thread? At least thats amusing.”
When life gives you limes make Marguritas.
PING me for Meghan threads! She deserves all the ridicule we can muster.
To: fishtank
How about banning any pictures of her... and Helen Thomas. Yes, I am probably asking for it here... :-O
38
posted on
04/20/2009 12:51:53 PM PDT
by
Xenophon450
(Through false sensory perceptions of the flesh, you paint without colours on a canvas blank.)
To: fishtank
No, ban Megan. Her 15 minutes are over. She has nothing more to contribute.
39
posted on
04/20/2009 12:52:01 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: fishtank
I’m all for it. I haven’t clicked on a Megan McCain thread in about 10 days. But it dismays me to see that the threads get so many views and responses.
To: fishtank
“Meghan McCain: Can we ban mentioning her on FR???”
I hope so. I was hoping somebody would bring this very thing up.
This LXXXXXX size idiot gives idiots a bad name.
Thank you.
To: fishtank
How about we just ban all posts about people who irritate you?
Could you then post a list of banned persons?
To: fishtank
43
posted on
04/20/2009 12:52:46 PM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Saiga 12 shotgun - When the Zombies see it, they'll sh*t bricks.)
To: fishtank
I think the Mittwits post articles about her because she agrees with their hero (Mutt Romney) on every issue.
44
posted on
04/20/2009 12:53:58 PM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: fishtank
That would be GREAT! I hope to not see this meaningless twit’s name and opinions ever again.
45
posted on
04/20/2009 12:53:59 PM PDT
by
Aria
( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
To: rabscuttle385
"The Meghan McCain Truth File."
Looks like this thread makes your Ping List non-operational.
To: fishtank
So you create a new thread about Meaghan to ask not to create new threads about her?
mmmmmkay.
47
posted on
04/20/2009 12:55:17 PM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Definition of a sucker: Pay your bills like a responsible adult to compensate for those who didn't!)
To: Califreak
“Why not ban mentioning any of the McCains?”
Amen!
Ban them now.
Except, and this is important, they are so easy to make fun of, and so needing of criticism. Maybe we just need a break.
48
posted on
04/20/2009 12:55:17 PM PDT
by
pallis
To: fishtank
I totally agree. It lowers the level of Free Republic to publish stuff about such a totally insignificant person, it gives her publicity that otherwise she will not get, and also it plays right in the hands of the liberal media who wants the conservative forums such as Free Republic to waste time and energy on such insignificant person.
49
posted on
04/20/2009 12:55:21 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(God Bless our brave troops)
To: Wooly
What ever happened to the Daily Pray for George Bush people? Do they not need to pray for Obama also? Why would someone want to pray that Obama succeeds unless you are a socialist? His vision for the future of this country is a far different one that our founding fathers fought for.
50
posted on
04/20/2009 12:55:21 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(I guess it all depends upon what the meaning of "bow" is.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-121 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson