Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama may stage terror attacks and cancel 2012 elections...
teamsarah.org ^ | 4/21/2009 | Paul Joseph Watson

Posted on 04/21/2009 9:24:19 PM PDT by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes has given perhaps his most dire warning yet, saying that the Obama administration is preparing to stage terror attacks, declare martial law and cancel the 2012 elections, which is why they are demonizing their political enemies as criminals and terrorists.

Keyes is best known for his performance during the 2000 Republican presidential debates, when he was accredited by many media outlets as being the clear winner during a series of debates with George W. Bush and John McCain.

“It’s obvious that they will stop at nothing,” Keyes told attendees of a reception in Fort Wayne, adding, “We may wake up one day and there’s a series of terrorist attacks, the economy is paralysed….martial law will be declared everywhere in the United States and it won’t end until the crisis ends.”

Keyes said that Americans should be thankful if they even see another election in 2012, stating, “If we don’t wake up and work to see that it happens, we will not see another election.”

“The minute they think they can get away with it, they will end this system of government and that is their intention,” added Keyes, noting that everyone acting as if the time we are in was just “business as usual” reminds him of the attitude of politicians in the Weimar Republic when Hitler was rising to power or eastern Europe when the Communists were taking over after the second world war.

Keyes said that because the majority of people are decent-minded, they believe others will play by the rules when this simply isn’t the case, warning that this attitude will allow evil to take over before we can do anything about it.

“It is so clear hat we have now put a faction in place - they are not playing by the rules and they don’t intend to play by the rules - if they were playing by the rules they wouldn’t have tried to identify their opposition as criminals,” added Keyes, making reference to the recent controversy surrounding the release of the MIAC and Homeland Security reports, which implied that Americans who exercise and are knowledgeable about their constitutional rights are a threat to law enforcement and potential domestic terrorists.

Keyes said that the only solution was from the bottom up because our leaders “are so gutless that they won’t even ask that the Constitution be enforced for clear, plain, absolutely unequivocal requirements,” and respond meekly with “their lips shut and their hearts terrorized.”

Keyes also warned of Obama’s agenda to create a civilian security force and said it was part of the ultimate agenda to disarm American citizens and create a police state.

Keyes has been a vocal critic of Obama, warning that he is a radical Communist who is determined to destroy America, and that if his agenda is not stopped then the country as we know it will cease to exist.

NOTE: IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN DR. KEYES SPEECH AT THE PITTSBURGH TEA PARTY, IT'S A MUST WATCH. IT WAS ELECTRIFYING! (on his site: www.loyaltoliberty.com)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: 4fools; bho44; freaks; keyes; martiallaw; obama; paranoia; puhleeeeeeeeeeeeeeze; socialism; terrorism; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

1 posted on 04/21/2009 9:24:19 PM PDT by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

It would not surprise me


2 posted on 04/21/2009 9:26:41 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives
Keyes is best known for his performance during the 2000 Republican presidential debates

Keyes is best known for his performance in a couple of senate races.

3 posted on 04/21/2009 9:28:36 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

It’s what everyone has been thinking the whole time...just no one’s said it out loud until now.


4 posted on 04/21/2009 9:28:38 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Misleading headline. Keyes doesn’t say that Obama will stage attacks; just that they’re likely to occur, and that he’ll exploit them to further his power grab. I’m inclined to agree.


5 posted on 04/21/2009 9:28:52 PM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

wow.

Now what a President we would have had in Keyes.


6 posted on 04/21/2009 9:29:32 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

me neither but it appears Keyes has once agin “jumped the shark” with this one


7 posted on 04/21/2009 9:29:37 PM PDT by KTM rider ( lack of production and greed killed capitalism , socialism will fill the void)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: william clark

Will we ever escape this insanity?!!


8 posted on 04/21/2009 9:30:08 PM PDT by diamond6 (Is SIDS preventable? www.Stopsidsnow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

Um...


9 posted on 04/21/2009 9:30:15 PM PDT by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

This may be the case.

Nevertheless, a bit of proof to back up such a statement would be welcome.

If I recall correctly, many feared the same exact thing from Clinton - and many on the left feared the same from Bush.


10 posted on 04/21/2009 9:30:49 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

Is this really something that should be on the teamsarah.org web site?


11 posted on 04/21/2009 9:30:57 PM PDT by MarkeyD (OBAMA. Chains we can believe in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby
I love Dr. Keyes but I have heard this from every side for every election since Clinton’s reelection in 1996. At least this time they didn't say marshall law.
12 posted on 04/21/2009 9:31:01 PM PDT by centexan (Welcome back 4th ID - great job. Go 1st Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

> Keyes also warned of Obama’s agenda to create a civilian security force and said it was part of the ultimate agenda to disarm American citizens and create a police state.

Americorps.


13 posted on 04/21/2009 9:31:39 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

I’ve been telling my husband this since the election. 2008 was our last “free” election, and even that was a farce. God help us.


14 posted on 04/21/2009 9:31:58 PM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (I love the Bill of Rights. Is that extremist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives; Admin Moderator

Why post such nonsense?


15 posted on 04/21/2009 9:32:04 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

If this happened (doubtful) I think there would be a coup and I would certainly support it. Zer0 has won no friends in the military as far as I can tell, and the general staff seems to have more balls than the likes of Shalikashvili and Clark.


16 posted on 04/21/2009 9:32:06 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Librerals are more dangerous to liberty than terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

The whacko liberals predicted Bush/Cheney would do the exact same thing to avoid the 2004.....then 2008 elections.

They are still whackjobs and so is anyone on our side who promotes or buys into this foolish waste of time.


17 posted on 04/21/2009 9:32:07 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

I’ve been saying it ever since the election, but everyone just called me a militant nut case.


18 posted on 04/21/2009 9:32:12 PM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

Yes I’m sure Obama would let no crisis go to waste, especially if it means he can maintain power.


19 posted on 04/21/2009 9:32:15 PM PDT by FromShadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark
I wouldn't put it past him either. But we're gonna have an election in 2012, whether the Pretender in Chief wants to participate or not.

WE HAVE TO!

Dear Lord we have to.

20 posted on 04/21/2009 9:32:43 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: william clark
Misleading headline. Keyes doesn’t say that Obama will stage attacks; just that they’re likely to occur, and that he’ll exploit them to further his power grab. I’m inclined to agree.

Thank you for setting the record straight.

21 posted on 04/21/2009 9:33:40 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Our flag still waves! And we shall NEVER let them tear it down!" - Alan Keyes, 4-15-09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: william clark
Very misleading.. It sounds more like a NewsMax or WorldNetDaily headline.
22 posted on 04/21/2009 9:33:48 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("Hey Liberals.. We don't lower our standards, so up yours!" - Andrew Wilkow show)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: al baby

I am a bit more easily surprised.


23 posted on 04/21/2009 9:33:56 PM PDT by Williams (It's The Policies, Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Nonsense? You have got to be kidding me


24 posted on 04/21/2009 9:34:08 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives
I have PROOF of the article's assertions.

My proof is that it COULD happen!

25 posted on 04/21/2009 9:34:20 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union, then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

weren’t the malcontents saying the same thing about Bush?

c’mon....not this crap again.


26 posted on 04/21/2009 9:34:21 PM PDT by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

How did Sarah hook up with Keyes? Does she even know him or approve of him? I would not vote for her if she aligns herself with him and I sent her lots of donations!


27 posted on 04/21/2009 9:34:27 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

>>Why post such nonsense?<<

Its certainly not news ,particularly not breaking news....

We’ve had this kind of baseless paranoia from the left for 8 years and it didn’t help the country.


28 posted on 04/21/2009 9:36:53 PM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

This is the sort of stuff the libs were saying about Bush in 2008; that he would declare martial law, shut down elections, or plan some sort of false flag event (like he did on 9/11 :). It made them sound like moonbats to most people. The other moonbats went right along with it, of course. I don’t know how far you can take this stuff even with a Marxist socialist in power; it would be hard to pull off even if he replaced everyone in government. Still, some kind of permanent takeover is much more likely with socialists in control, and always has been. Especially with a blind following. Remember, the libs completely ignored Obama’s communist and terrorist connections, even though the facts surrounding them are indisputable. The rejected the conclusions about the facts, not the facts themselves, meaning they gave up on logic in order to support Obama. They may as well have voted for Hitler in that case.


29 posted on 04/21/2009 9:36:57 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

Why cancel elections when you can just naturalize immigrants en mass to fix them; and buy votes with other people’s money just to be sure?


30 posted on 04/21/2009 10:05:44 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

Dear admin, please yank this stupid post. Paranoia is no way to regain power.


31 posted on 04/21/2009 10:09:19 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives
the Obama administration is preparing to stage terror attacks, declare martial law and cancel the 2012 elections,

I must be a fear-monger, because I've been talking about this for a month.

My friends and neighbors think I'm nuts. But then, they thought I was nuts
when I told them Obama wants to own the financial system, and they're still
in denial after Obama declared it.

Oh, BTW, There is no way this can happen to us, the USA.
Never. Nope. Not a chance.

32 posted on 04/21/2009 10:09:58 PM PDT by MaxMax (RINO=RAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minn
Why cancel elections when you can just naturalize immigrants en mass to fix them;
and buy votes with other people’s money just to be sure?

When the Election results are certain, there is no need for elections.
Signed, MSM.

33 posted on 04/21/2009 10:11:49 PM PDT by MaxMax (RINO=RAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

Here’s a thread with a booklet called “The Revolution Was”, written by a conservative in 1938 about the New Deal and FDR. Almost every word is coming true again 70 years later!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/929392/posts

An excerpt with regard to Crisis:

Worse outwitted were those who kept trying to make sense of the New Deal from the point of view of all that was implicit in the American scheme, charging it therefore with contradiction, fallacy, economic ignorance, and general incompetence to govern.

But it could not be so embarrassed and all that line was wasted, because, in the first place, it never intended to make that kind of sense.... For what it meant to do [communist revolution] it was from the beginning consistent in principle, resourceful, intelligent, masterly in workmanship, and it made not one mistake.


34 posted on 04/21/2009 10:14:11 PM PDT by 21twelve (Drive Reality out with a pitchfork if you want , it always comes back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Minn

>>Dear admin, please yank this stupid post. Paranoia is no way to regain power.<<

They took it down for a while and reviewed it.


35 posted on 04/21/2009 10:15:33 PM PDT by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

I admire Alan Keyes, but weren’t the tinfoilers saying that about Bush?


36 posted on 04/21/2009 10:19:05 PM PDT by Califreak (Obama is Swahili for "Death to America")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

We’ll have an election in 2010, when we can at least stem the tide...


37 posted on 04/21/2009 10:26:22 PM PDT by bt_dooftlook (John Adams: Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Califreak
"...but weren’t the tinfoilers saying that about Bush?"

Yes.
38 posted on 04/21/2009 10:27:39 PM PDT by kb2614 (Hell hath no fury than a bureaucrat scorned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
The whacko liberals predicted Bush/Cheney would do the exact same thing to avoid the 2004.....then 2008 elections.

Maybe so, but Bush wasn't in the middle of a major power grab to fundamentally change the country at the time.

0bama is seizing the financial system, destroying the wealth of the middle class, expanding government beyond comprehension, stifling dissent, and selling the country into poverty for generations to come.

All Bush did (by 2004) was fight terrorism and keep the country safe.

39 posted on 04/21/2009 10:28:30 PM PDT by Wil H (The most destructive act of Muslim terrorism against the US was paying for 0bama's Harvard education)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
History always repeats itself. Even in this age, History will repeat itself.

The Battle will always be, and the numbers of casualties will always be high.

America isn't but only 304-Million, and yet, we've taken over the planet.
Obama needs to even the odds for the good of the other 4.7 Billion.

40 posted on 04/21/2009 10:29:17 PM PDT by MaxMax (RINO=RAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax
America's population is 304-Million.
Obama needs to punish America for the other 4.7 Billion.
41 posted on 04/21/2009 10:37:59 PM PDT by MaxMax (America's population is 304-Million. Obama must punish America for the other 4.7 Billion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
These past few decades are the first I ever heard of anyone even imagining such a contingency. Is was so unthinkable that nobody thought of it. The very fact that someone can imagine it suggests that someone is capable of carrying it out. What times we live in.
42 posted on 04/21/2009 10:39:10 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (There is no distinctly native American criminal class...save Congress. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

*sigh*...not this crap again...my god I have been smacking the same shit down from truthers since 9/11...

First off...you’re paranoid....

First off...go to oath keepers....

http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/

Then realize you are not alone...we’re all with here with you....millions of us....

Around 60 million exactly....that would be 60 million GUN OWNERS...holding some 180 MILLION guns...

Now for a point of reference....

5000 assholes with ak’s and IED’s gave our entire combined forced a hard time in a country the size of OHIO...

What in the flying F@#K do you think they are going to do with 60 million pissed off AMERICANS?????

carpet bomb?...nuke a city? or ten?

christ...get a frickin clue...

You think 60 million people are just gonna line up and turn in their guns????

And such a thing would REQUIRE that the military would even do such a thing nationwide...

Those same troops you supported yesterday?

REALLY?

There arent enough feds to do it...

If the narco GANGS...you know..the well armed criminals....like the ZETA’s MS-13 or the latin kings decide to go Mumbai and take out a bunch of civilians....you would kiss the ground your troops walk on when they show up...You’d damand the national gaurd...

I’m with Ted Nugent.....excersise your rights....keep your powder dry...and be vigilant...

No need to go off half cocked, when fully cocked is the way to go...

Now is not the time to get nutz...it’s the to scream bloody murder....

You know libs fear Americans more than Jihadists?

Jihadists cant storm washington and hang them from lamp posts....

And if you read oath keepers carefully...you’d see that the cops and military might just stand aside and direct traffic to washington for public safety.......cant have a bunch of accidents on the way to dispence justice...

I’m sure there would be those who might stand with a corrupt govt....but I dont fear the citizen soldiers...they KNOW who had their back for the last 8 years...and they know it isnt the libs.

Calm down sir!

60 million guns owners...180 million guns...

Scale and scope....


43 posted on 04/21/2009 10:42:47 PM PDT by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Minn

I agree ...DU spent a lot of time telling folks that the Devil (GW Bush) was never gonna leave the WH .

This is equally silly ....

If we have a terror attack
Obama is toast


44 posted on 04/21/2009 10:43:06 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

If Obama tried to stop the next election the tanks would roll. BUT, I could see them using extra legal means to rig an election or cancel out a results they didn’t like. Hnging chads and all that.


45 posted on 04/21/2009 10:52:52 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

bookmark


46 posted on 04/21/2009 11:06:19 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wil H

“0bama is seizing the financial system, destroying the wealth of the middle class, expanding government beyond comprehension, stifling dissent, and selling the country into poverty for generations to come.”

See - that’s just crazy talk there! Next thing you’ll be telling me that Obama wants to take over companies and fire CEOs!


47 posted on 04/21/2009 11:07:06 PM PDT by 21twelve (Drive Reality out with a pitchfork if you want , it always comes back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Crim
Hey Crim, Go “F” yourself and shove your diatribe up your “A”!


Oh, Have a Happy Happy Dingy Wingy Day. dolt

48 posted on 04/21/2009 11:09:11 PM PDT by MaxMax (America's population is 304-Million. Obama must punish America for the other 4.7 Billion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Minn

From Alan Keyes’ web page (http://www.loyaltoliberty.com/):

This phrase has been much on my mind of late as I consider the bloodless coup d’état that is currently underway in the United States. In speech and deed the Obama faction has displayed its intention to overthrow the Constitution of the United States. The faction’s claim to presidential power rests on an overt act of contempt for the authority of the U.S. Constitution (Obama’s refusal to submit for scrutiny (as John McCain did) proper evidence that he satisfies the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency.) The destruction of the private sector economy is well under way; along with denial of the effective basis for anything like private property (the term means nothing if the government can at will and without due process of law dictate its disposition. No due process, as required by the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, will be involved in the exercise of the Treasury Secretary’s discretionary authority to hire, fire, set salaries, etc. in any business enterprise with a government funded credit line.) The Obama faction’s majority in the Congress has asserted a patently unconstitutional power to dole out voting privileges in the legislative branch of the U.S. government without regard to the Constitution’s language restricting such voting privileges to states, or voting districts within them. They aim to take steps that infringe the right to keep and bear arms explicitly protected by the Constitution’s second amendment and that implicitly removes the freedom from governmental coercion in matters of religious conscience explicitly protected by the first amendment (for instance, by forcing medical workers to participate in the pagan practice of child sacrifice disguised as a medical procedure). Obama apparently has no problem with legal appointees who advocate the absurd view that Islamic sharia law can be implemented in the United States despite its grotesque inconsistency with Constitutional provisions that forbid cruel and unusual punishment and that demand equal protection of the law for all persons (without, for example, the discrimination against females routinely found and practiced under sharia law.)

Faced with all this evidence that regime change is the goal of the Obama faction, conservatives whose understanding of the term includes support for our constitutional republic have been bucking the tide of slack-jawed adulation promoted by the Obama faction’s media claque. We have been hard at work trying to awaken people to the fact that there’s nothing “business as usual” about the Obama faction’s challenge to American freedom. It is nothing short of a politically implemented insurgency. Here and there it’s meeting pockets of resistance on particular issues, with words and arguments mostly oblivious to its general significance. Not much further down the road (after the Census has been rigged and enough illegals added to the voters’ rolls to swing any election), the political liberty for which so many Americans risked and gave their lives will be gone. I live in hope that as the true nature of their goal becomes obvious to more and more people, even some of those gulled by phony charisma and false claims of historic significance will realize that the loss of their participation in America’s historically unique exercise of democratic, republican self-government is too much of a price to pay for guilt about racism. I live in hope that they didn’t mean for their votes to end government of, by and for the people.

As it turns out the greatest threat to the effort to dispel complacency before it’s too late doesn’t come from the Obama faction. They have moved with alacrity to implement their agenda. Like a brake impaired double truck trailer hurtling down a steep incline, their excessive speed stirs up a gust hefty enough to shake the unwary from their stupor, provided no one explains it away as a harmless passing breeze. But some folks stamped with a phony imprimatur of “conservatism” are doing just that. At first people like this resisted the idea that we should call Obama a socialist, as I did during my campaign against him in Illinois in 2004. Now they themselves admit his socialism, but claim that it’s a benign variety, well known in Western Europe to have caused no more than a mild epidemic of productivity-stifling bureaucracy, with no jackboots in sight. The smug epithets and ridicule once reserved for anyone who wouldn’t call a socialist a “liberal” is now heaped upon anyone who calls Obamacytes by their right names. They are advocates of cult-of-personality fueled submission to pervasive government control (complete with Hitler Jugend style reeducation of the young as uniformed “mandatory volunteers” programmed for loyal subservience to “the leaders” will). But the Devil take anyone who identifies them by the labels historically associated with the strikingly similar Nazi, Fascist, Stalin- and Maoist models of totalitarian socialism that wrecked havoc in the twentieth century. Obamacytes could sing the praises of Che Guevara to the tune of the Internationale, waving Mao’s little Red Book in the air in time to the music and these so-called conservatives would chide the ‘hotheads, birthers and fringe loonies’ who dared to notice the obvious. I suppose we must wait until they have consolidated their power and are emboldened to eliminate their opposition before we act on the hard lessons of all too recent history.


49 posted on 04/21/2009 11:36:38 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
See - that’s just crazy talk there! Next thing you’ll be telling me that Obama wants to take over companies and fire CEOs!

Oh come on! - He'd never go THAT far!

50 posted on 04/21/2009 11:38:20 PM PDT by Wil H (The most destructive act of Muslim terrorism against the US was paying for 0bama's Harvard education)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson