Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terror Threats Against George Bush Statue in Eureka Ca
Old Glory Radio ^ | 04/22/09 | Old Glory Radio

Posted on 04/22/2009 8:46:48 AM PDT by locke22

On the heals of announcements of the formation of a local Eureka Ca. ( Humboldt County ) committee and fund raising for the construction of a bust or statue of former president George W. Bush, local and state left wing radicals have announced terror threats and plans to destroy the proposed statue by explosion.

- LINK TO FULL ARTIVLE -


(Excerpt) Read more at oldgloryradio.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bush; domesticterrorism; doublestandard; dubya; hatespeech; leftwingextremists; liberals; mediablackout; nationalsecurity; politics; pravdamedia; presidentbush; presidentgeorgewbush; proterrorist; terror; w
“ We are aware of the threats and are not able at this time to discuss any investigation by federal and local authorities. We can say that the Topix forum hosting corporate office is aware of the situation of their service being used to further terroristic threats.”
1 posted on 04/22/2009 8:46:48 AM PDT by locke22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: locke22

Good grief. And we’re the ones they’re worried about.


2 posted on 04/22/2009 8:48:37 AM PDT by TexasBeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22

Whew!! Good thing its not a threat from those crazy RW extremists; Homeland Security has been warning us about.


3 posted on 04/22/2009 8:49:28 AM PDT by skully (Right Wing Extremist : Someone who loves America more then a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasBeth

Because after 40 years of bomb throwing liberals, they have now risen to the highest ranks of power in this country and can have the political purge of Conservatives that they have dreamed of for 40 years.

It isn’t the crime they are prosecuting, it is the ideology.


4 posted on 04/22/2009 8:49:48 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (IRONY - we know more about the First Dog's historical papers than we do of President Barack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasBeth

Exactly. *rolls eyes*


5 posted on 04/22/2009 8:49:53 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (The smallest minority on earth is the 'individual'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: locke22

a bunch of real brave PUNKS, would love to sit, ( I know, I can be a tree sitter )and wait on them to show


6 posted on 04/22/2009 8:50:05 AM PDT by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22
local and state left wing radicals

Freedom Fighters.

If they were tea party attendees they would be right wing terrorists. /s

7 posted on 04/22/2009 8:51:33 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, Question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Eureka PING!


8 posted on 04/22/2009 8:52:30 AM PDT by Roccus (The Capitol, the White House, the Court house.....................America's Axis of Evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

they actually think the feds don’t investigate things like this, idiots.


9 posted on 04/22/2009 9:02:06 AM PDT by locke22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: locke22

Yo Janet, got some more bombers for you to take a look at.


10 posted on 04/22/2009 9:03:06 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22
Please don't disagree with Obama, we must have bipartisanship. No criticism allowed.

But blowing up a statue of GW is OK, because we didn't like him.

This logic escapes me.

11 posted on 04/22/2009 9:03:39 AM PDT by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skully

Really! You saw the unrestrained mayhem that ensued at those tea parties... oh wait a minute that was the leftists at the G20! Never mind.


12 posted on 04/22/2009 9:05:12 AM PDT by madameguinot (Our Father's God to Thee, Author of Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: locke22

When BO gets a statue erected in Ithaca, Austin, Burlington, wherever I doubt he’ll strike the same powerful pose as W.

He’ll be wiping his skinny arse with the Constitution in his and all will be well.


13 posted on 04/22/2009 9:05:18 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22

I just can not wrap my pea brain around such craziness. Is there no end to what the far left will stoop to when something happens they do not happen to like?

Rally around abortion clinics . . . kill babies cause it is our right but blow up a statue of Bush cause he is evil. Good Lord what on earth is happening to this society???


14 posted on 04/22/2009 9:06:54 AM PDT by RepubRep (God Bless America and may He guard our borders until we WAKE UP and do it ourselves!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22

Words have meaning. You cannot terrorize a statute. You can threaten it, you can vandalize it, you can blow it up, you can pull it down, you can expose it to bird poop. But it is not a conscious being, and cannot be terrorized.


15 posted on 04/22/2009 9:09:00 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

It’s true that the statue is an inanimate thing but it is an expresion of speech or beliefes. Any attack on the statue is an attack on the beliefes of others.


16 posted on 04/22/2009 9:13:03 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

So, an attack on the beliefs of others, as opposed to an attack on others, is an act of terrorism?


17 posted on 04/22/2009 9:20:11 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

You do not know the defination of terror. The victim of terror is never the intended target.


18 posted on 04/22/2009 9:24:13 AM PDT by locke22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: locke22

Word to idiot liberals, George W Bush doesn’t have the power anymore to do anything. None ,nilch, nada.


19 posted on 04/22/2009 9:25:34 AM PDT by SonnyBubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
So, an attack on the beliefs of others, as opposed to an attack on others, is an act of terrorism?

In a sense yes. The threat to blow up a statue is a pretty extreme thing to do. It's a little hard to see this as less than a threat to the ideology behind the statue. The bombing of an abortion clinic may not be a direct attack on abortion supporters but it is a threat just the same as burning down churches.
20 posted on 04/22/2009 9:26:29 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: locke22

I don’t think we should have statues, schools named after, ships named after, etc of living current or former leaders at all (Presidents, Congressmen, whatever), but sure as hell don’t make terrorist threats about having them.


21 posted on 04/22/2009 9:39:07 AM PDT by Domandred (Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22

What are they threatening to do? Pull it down and then whack it in the head with their shoes?


22 posted on 04/22/2009 9:45:48 AM PDT by OpeEdMunkey (We seem to have reached a critical mass of stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22

That is absurd. What about the people in the twin towers? They weren’t both the victims AND the intended target? They were not the only victims, but they were victims of terror nevertheless.


23 posted on 04/22/2009 9:49:23 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

The victim of a terrorist act is never the intended target. You do not understand the definition
of the word terrorism. As you wrote, words have meaning.


24 posted on 04/22/2009 9:57:08 AM PDT by locke22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: locke22

Read the comments. Egads, the DUmmies are showing their true colors. However, the DUmmies posting there are the base of the Democratic Party, so these are not terroristic threats, they are just a unique way of political free speech. At least that is how one City Councildork from St. Paul, MN would describe it - yes, the same one who defended the actions of the RNC “anarchists” with Molotov cocktails and urine bombs. Now those disagreeing with the Obama administration in a civil manner - those are the real terrorists. Janet Napolitano said so.


25 posted on 04/22/2009 9:57:33 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (Leftism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22

Sorry to be so ignorant and stupid. Merriam-Webster says terrorism is “the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion,” without mentioning the intended target. Terrorism is the intent to intimidate or cause terror. Destroying a statute, however repugnant, surely isn’t intimidating, it is maddening, it might be insulting but it is not threatening, nor is it what I would call coercive. Who would be coerced? What would they be coerced into doing? What, pray, would be coercive in blowing up a statue? It might cause alarm among the non-sentient statue population, but few others unless they happen to be very skittish, or unless they believe themselves to be non-sentient statues. By your definition, sanitation workers threatening to strike is an act of terror. Blank slate, indeed.


26 posted on 04/22/2009 10:40:14 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

A statue, a building, an airport, all symbols. The terror aspect is not the building statue or people next to it, it is the political target that is the end result. As you wrote, Terrorism is the intent to intimidate or cause terror.


27 posted on 04/22/2009 10:50:00 AM PDT by locke22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: locke22

I guess the bottom line is, I am not terrorized by acts of vandalism and destruction carried out on inanimate things, regardless how symbolic, or threats thereof. I come from sterner stock. And that is why the 9.11 creatures struck the twin towers instead of the Statue of Liberty.


28 posted on 04/22/2009 11:13:24 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SonnyBubba
[President] George W Bush doesn’t have the power anymore to do anything.

And they effectively curtailed many good things he tried to do while in office...with a lot of help from their "friends" across the isle.

29 posted on 04/22/2009 12:19:19 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SonnyBubba
[President] George W Bush doesn’t have the power anymore to do anything.

And they effectively curtailed many good things he tried to do while in office...with a lot of help from their "friends" across the isle.

30 posted on 04/22/2009 12:19:59 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Most of the nutcase replies on the local Topix site come from the malcontents over at the juvenile hall on taxpayer funded computers. I rarely reply to them...
31 posted on 04/22/2009 3:09:30 PM PDT by tubebender ( Large Reward offered for missing Tag line. Last seen heading East with notorious Beau the Black Lab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: locke22

I don’t think the George Bush statue is SKEERD of these
leftist threats. Hahahahah!


32 posted on 04/22/2009 3:23:52 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: locke22

Funny thing is that the democrats in office were the ones who started this calling Bush a war criminal. After reading the thread that is what the idiot who makes the threats keeps going back to. (lets conveniently forget that the democrats also sanctioned the war though)

Liberals can be as violent as they want. When we get involved with anything like half a million people all over the country in peaceful protest and not one report of violence at all we are called terrorists.


33 posted on 04/22/2009 9:12:31 PM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

OK. I just saw it was in Eureka and figured ya might be interested.


34 posted on 04/23/2009 6:10:34 AM PDT by Roccus (The Capitol, the White House, the Court house.....................America's Axis of Evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Oh I was interested and what I meant to say it is futile to reply to the rabid posters on the Topix board. There is a very active DU contingent here around Humboldt Bay spewing their garbage...
35 posted on 04/23/2009 6:23:09 AM PDT by tubebender ( Large Reward offered for missing Tag line. Last seen heading East with notorious Beau the Black Lab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: albie
When BO gets a statue erected in Ithaca, Austin, Burlington, wherever I doubt he’ll strike the same powerful pose as W.

It is a great looking statue, isn't it?! Not a person that would go around apologizing to the world for his country!

36 posted on 04/23/2009 6:23:11 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (WASS-----FUBO----O.B.A.M.A.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson