Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest News on The Death Tax
TheDeadPelican.com ^

Posted on 04/22/2009 9:52:26 PM PDT by rvoitier

The good news is that Congress realizes that the American people are not going to stand for a permanent 45% Death Tax.

The bad news is . . .


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: deathtax; taxes

The Editorial Page of THEDEADPELICAN.COM



Latest News on The Death Tax

From Dick Patten of AFBI:


The Death Tax fight is not slowing down one bit.
 
Congress has just returned to Washington from its Easter Recess, and already is discussing the Death Tax. 


 
In the Congressional Daily, a newspaper for Members of Congress and their staffers, I explained our strategy to stop the Obama 45% Death Tax.  You can read the full article below. 
 
The good news is that Congress realizes that the American people are not going to stand for a permanent 45% Death Tax.  Further, the New York Times published a 2nd article saying that Obama's agenda is vulnerable due to the Death Tax.  This is evidence of a victory by AFBI members.

 
Thank you for your excellent work over the past month - it has paid off! 
 
The bad news is that proto-socialist groups like "United for a Fair Economy" (UFE) are pressuring Congress to keep or even increase the Death Tax.  They are in rage that Congress passed an amendment to lower the tax to 35%.  They are doing everything they can to overturn that amendment and return the Death Tax to a "fair" (read: confiscatory) level. 
 
Despite what you might assume, UFE and similar leftist groups are very well-funded.  That means they pose a real challenge to the fight for the American dream.  They have the support of Warren Buffett and his ilk in their fight to redistribute the life-earnings of the American entrepreneur. 


 
Chad, I need to ask you to help me counteract UFE and stop their plans for a permanent 45% Death Tax.
 
First, I need to ask you to call your Senators if you have not already done so.  Make sure they know that you want them to fight for American jobs and economic recovery - not redistribution of wealth.
 
Second, I need you to forward this email on to three friends, and ask them to visit www.nodeathtax.org and sign up our petition.  We need to build a larger and stronger army in order to win the Death Tax.fight.

 
Can you help me with these goals?  Your involvement has already done so much, but we can't give up now.
 
I'll keep fighting from DC.  Thanks again for your excellent work.
 
Preserve the American Dream!


Dick's Signature
Dick Patten
President
American Family Business Institute

P.S. It is very likely that the Senate will vote on Death Tax legislation this week.  Please contact your Senators today!

 
 


1 posted on 04/22/2009 9:52:26 PM PDT by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Sure they are. They have for decades without a peep.


2 posted on 04/22/2009 9:55:22 PM PDT by spyone (ridiculum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Congress needs something that will scare the living hell out of them. I don’t know what form that will take. Until then, they will continue to run roughshod over us.


3 posted on 04/22/2009 9:56:59 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

The most criminal tax of all needs a permanent burial. But alas, that doesn’t look like it’ll be happening any time soon. ...or perhaps ever.


4 posted on 04/22/2009 9:59:51 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“The most criminal tax of all needs a permanent burial.”

I can’t see why it’s worse than property, sales, and income taxes, which impoverish the living. They are all bad, but to me the estate tax is the least bad of the 4.

A 35% max rate sounds about as good as we’ll get from this congress. What’s critical is to index the exemption and rates to inflation. You know there’s going to be a lot of inflation!


5 posted on 04/22/2009 10:07:11 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

At the rate they’re going, there won’t be any need for a “Death Tax”. They’ll take it all while you’re still alive.


6 posted on 04/22/2009 10:07:21 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (What did Obama's Teleprompter know, and when did it know it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devere

“They are all bad, but to me the estate tax is the least bad of the 4.”

Unless you want to pass on the family farm to your heirs?

Where’s Willy Nelson when you need him?


7 posted on 04/22/2009 10:15:11 PM PDT by nralife (Sarah doesn't know it's a damn show! She thinks it's a damn fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: devere

You pay taxes on income and on products and services once.

Why should the government get another crack at your money after you are dead?

It belongs to your children and your heirs. It does not belong to the state because it is not theirs.


8 posted on 04/22/2009 10:18:30 PM PDT by incredulous joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
FYI -- According to the link provided:

The American Family Business Institute (AFBI) is a 501(c)(6) trade association of family business-owners and farmers....

Not that there's anything wrong with the AFBI or with being against the death tax, but the AFBI is a lobbying group. Just so you know.

9 posted on 04/22/2009 10:19:35 PM PDT by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

>Congress needs something that will scare the living hell out of them. I don’t know what form that will take. Until then, they will continue to run roughshod over us.

I bet that a civil war would do it.


10 posted on 04/22/2009 10:21:54 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Tax collections are down about 30% for the month from last year. That is huge.


11 posted on 04/22/2009 10:41:16 PM PDT by GeronL (TYRANNY SENTINEL. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe

“You pay taxes on income and on products and services once.”

I don’t see why I should have to pay anything on the money I earn or spend, or just to live in my house. Why is it fair? I need the money to live, and to educate my children.

When I die I don’t care as much what happens to my estate. It’s financial fertilizer, and if it helps keep the government afloat it’s OK with me.

You folks crusading against the estate tax in particular would prefer to raise all my other taxes instead, and I am opposed.


12 posted on 04/22/2009 10:43:31 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: devere

Family farms get killed on estate taxes. My brothers and I worked like dogs for years building the family farm making it quite a success. Even with years of estate planning when my father passed the debt to the feds caused us to sell off some of it. Land based businesses are tough enough to grow. Holding them is even tougher.


13 posted on 04/22/2009 11:01:48 PM PDT by steelie (Still Right Thinking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steelie

There is no perfect tax, except perhaps a lottery.

If your father had paid you much better all those years you worked like a dog, you would have paid more income taxes every year, but the family farm would have been worth less for estate tax purposes. You choose your poison. And of course a married couple can gift $26000 per year tax free to each of their children every year. Personally I would favor an estate tax exemption of $10 million indexed to inflation. But then I’m a Republican, not a Democrat. $3.5 million with a 35% rate is the best you’re going to get out of this bunch.


14 posted on 04/23/2009 12:02:32 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: devere

I ain’t raising your taxes one single dime! You need to get your mind right.

“It’s financial fertilizer, and if it helps keep the government afloat it’s OK with me.”

It’s been a while since I have seen such a ridiculous statement on FR.

“You folks crusading against the estate tax in particular would prefer to raise all my other taxes instead, and I am opposed.”

Do you know what the money that you are being taxed for is being spent on?? I do! I have seen the gross incompetence and abuse of funds that we are taxed on first hand. It is abused at an exponential rate!

You should spend some of your energies going after the morons that waste your money not the “crusaders” that they are taking it from.

The money that you pay in taxes ~ ALL THE VARIOUS TAXES ~ is being wasted at a rate that should make your head spin.


15 posted on 04/23/2009 5:14:52 AM PDT by incredulous joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe

“It does not belong to the state because it is not theirs.”

As of January 20, 2009, you’re wrong. All assets are now the property of The State; if you’re a good little comrade and toe the Marxist line, they just might let you keep a little to live on - but never make the mistake of believing again in the concept of private property. It’s dead, just like the Constitution.


16 posted on 04/23/2009 6:13:31 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: devere
They are all bad, but to me the estate tax is the least bad of the 4.

Really? The Estate Tax goes after money that has already been subject to income tax*, and does so (at least now) at a far higher rate. It exclusively punishes lifetime thrift, and can be utterly devastating to a family-run business that operates on fairly thin margins (after paying barely reasonable, and sometimes very skimpy, salaries to family employees).

I say this as an Estate Planning lawyer who does better when the Estate Tax is higher and hits more families: it is no good for the country. It needs either permanent repeal, or at the least there needs to be a very high lifetime exemption of $10 million or $50 million.

Keep something in mind: if nothing is done, there will be no Estate Tax in 2010. However, for anyone dying on or after 1/1/2011, the lifetime exemption goes back to the 2001 level of $1 million. Many, many more people will be hit by it - and all that is required is gridlock in DC.

* Except for capital gains on assets held by the decedent at the time they die. I'd be in favor of getting rid of the Estate Tax, in exchange for subjecting these otherwise untaxed gains at long term capital gains rate on the decedent's final income tax return. However, that simply won't happen (it also happens to be an accounting nightmare, and I know this because I am also a CPA who prepared taxes for about a dozen years).

17 posted on 04/23/2009 6:55:33 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant-wannabee: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe

““It’s financial fertilizer, and if it helps keep the government afloat it’s OK with me.”
“It’s been a while since I have seen such a ridiculous statement on FR.”

It’s not nearly as ridiculous as trying to convince me that I will need money more once I die rather than now when I am alive.

The estate tax is a tax, and as such it is going to hurt someone. However, contrary to the rhetoric of the “anti-death-tax” zealots, the estate tax appears to me to be the least harmful of the major taxes we currently are harmed by (income, sales, property, estate ). It’s also obvious that if you lower one of these taxes to zero, the remainder will rise!


18 posted on 04/23/2009 7:00:29 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: steelie
Family farms get killed on estate taxes. My brothers and I worked like dogs for years building the family farm making it quite a success. Even with years of estate planning when my father passed the debt to the feds caused us to sell off some of it. Land based businesses are tough enough to grow. Holding them is even tougher.

While I genuinely sympathize with your plight, I fail to understand why a lifetime of working on a farm is of greater value than working at any other job, and therefor I see no difference between taxing the lifetime accumulations of either a farmer, a factory worker or a doctor - it is wrong in all cases. Yes, some businesses are not liquid (like farms), and there needs to be a provision allowing the Estate Tax to be paid off gradually (oh, wait, there IS such a provision - so farmers and others with estates highly concentrated in one asset already get a break that someone with a large portfolio of stocks, bonds and mutual funds doesn't get).

Sorry, no one deserves a special break. We ALL need to fight the Estate Tax. We need to hang together, or surely we will all hang together.

19 posted on 04/23/2009 7:02:29 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant-wannabee: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

“They are all bad, but to me the estate tax is the least bad of the 4.”

“Really?”

Really!


20 posted on 04/23/2009 7:02:30 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: devere

I fail to see how the taxing of yearly income at rates of up to 35% (and that only after $250,000) is worse than taxing your lifetime accumulation of assets (INCLUDING the death benefit of life insurance policies, if you own or control the policies) at 45%. Maybe you see something I don’t, but at an Estate Planning attorney with a CPA and a dozen years of preparing taxes, that’s how I see it.

That, of course, doesn’t give me the warm and fuzzies regarding income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, etc. I just view them as less destructive.


21 posted on 04/23/2009 7:19:50 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant-wannabee: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: devere

Oh, by the way, I forgot to mention that your lifetime accumulation of wealth may very well include inheritances from your parents and other relatives whose estates were already subject to tax - so that money will have been taxed 3 times (income tax to your folks, estate tax on them, estate tax on you). Robin Hood, IOW.


22 posted on 04/23/2009 7:21:52 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant-wannabee: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: devere
I suspect that if you or your immediate family ever accumulate even near the assets that'd render you vulnerable to the death tax you'd see things a bit differently.
23 posted on 04/23/2009 8:57:22 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: devere
It’s financial fertilizer, and if it helps keep the government afloat it’s OK with me.

You bought that propaganda, eh? Pretty sad.

24 posted on 04/23/2009 8:59:35 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“I suspect that if you or your immediate family ever accumulate even near the assets that’d render you vulnerable to the death tax you’d see things a bit differently.”

Neither Warren Buffett and Bill Gates is opposed to the estate tax. Andrew Carnegie was strongly in favor of it. Sam Walton was simply too smart for the government, and maneuvered around it. It seems to be the lower-tier wealthy, with their $5-25 million accumulations, who complain the most. Anyway, it seems that I’m already paying over 1/3 of my income in taxes every year. That bothers me more than the possibility of doing it again once when I die. You have neither my sympathy nor my vote on this issue.


25 posted on 04/23/2009 9:09:34 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: devere
Neither Warren Buffett and Bill Gates is opposed to the estate tax. Andrew Carnegie was strongly in favor of it.

There is no law preventing someone from writing a check to the US Treasury in order to give it more money than you legally owe it. As for the rest of us who would like to pass on to our loved ones the hard-earned fruit of our lifetime's labor, the Estate Tax is an abomination. Again, I say that as someone who earns a living helping people legally avoid it (hey, I know that I've got job security, regardless of my personal preferences).

26 posted on 04/23/2009 9:15:16 AM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant-wannabee: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: devere
Neither Warren Buffett and Bill Gates is opposed to the estate tax.

That's because they have enough money/assets to protect their estates from the tax man by dolling it out to their family through their foundations. Obviously if their families were personally affected by the tax in any way they'd crusade like mad against it.

It seems to be the lower-tier wealthy, with their $5-25 million accumulations, who complain the most.

That's because they're the ones you actually have to pay the tax. Again, if you or your family ever get even close to the $5-$25 million range you'd see things a bit differently.

As far as your take on income taxes goes, you're preaching to the choir.

27 posted on 04/23/2009 9:16:58 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

“You bought that propaganda, eh? Pretty sad.”

“The growing disposition to tax more and more heavily large estates left at death is a cheering indication of the growth of a salutary change in public opinion.... Of all forms of taxation, this seems the wisest. Men who continue hoarding great sums all their lives, the proper use of which for public ends would work good to the community, should be made to feel that the community, in the form of the state, cannot thus be deprived of its proper share. By taxing estates heavily at death, the state marks its condemnation of the selfish millionaire’s unworthy life.
. . . This policy would work powerfully to induce the rich man to attend to the administration of wealth during his life, which is the end that society should always have in view, as being that by far most fruitful for the people”
Andrew Camegie, “Wealth,” North American Review, 148, no. 391 (June 1889): 653, 657­62.

Just another communist? lol

Use your money to benefit your community, church, and other causes near and dear to your heart. Then you can die and leave zilch to Uncle Sam.

One change I would like to see would put a time limit on all tax-exempt foundations established by bequest. They shouldn’t be allowed to be perpetual in my opinion.


28 posted on 04/23/2009 9:20:32 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: devere

Again, the ultra-rich are completely protected from the death tax (through their foundations and the like), so their personal crusades in favor of the tax ring completely hollow. Neither you or Bill Gates have to worry about the gov’t coming after YOUR money. ...albeit for (far) different reasons.


29 posted on 04/23/2009 9:28:25 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: devere
...the selfish millionaire’s unworthy life.

The church of the state is now open, Bishop Andrew Carnegie presiding.

Your propaganda purchase will be taxed heavily, naturally...

30 posted on 04/23/2009 9:45:26 AM PDT by MortMan (Power without responsibility-the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. - Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

The debate:

Ayn Rand versus Andrew Carnegie

Now that would be worth attending!

Forget about Michael Crichton versus Al Gore. That would have to be ended by some sort of mercy rule.


31 posted on 04/23/2009 9:59:23 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: devere
“rhetoric of the “anti-death-tax” zealots”

Aw, knock that crap off and come up with a real argument.

It has nothing to do with “what you need” after you are dead. What kind of boneheaded statement is that? Obviously, no one, even an “anti-death tax zealot” like me, is going to need property when they are dead.

It's a matter of private property. Do you have children or heirs? Don't they deserve the benefits of what you have worked for, whether that is 10k or 10 million dollars?

Your property does not belong to the government. How did you get this idea?

“It’s also obvious that if you lower one of these taxes to zero, the remainder will rise!”

That is not obvious. Lots of states have raised sales taxes and it has actually resulted in less revenue because people have stopped buying goods or else they have purchased goods in another state.

You need to worry a little bit less about us zealots and a little more about the fiscally irresponsible morons that are running this country.

If I managed my own house the way our government runs the country I would either be broke or in jail ~ and I would deserve it!

32 posted on 04/23/2009 10:22:44 PM PDT by incredulous joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson