Judiciary Committee greenlights 'hate crimes': Members refuse to protect Christian pastors...

World Net Daily ^ | April 23, 2009 | Bob Unruh

[manc]

does the black church know this along with Latino churches because I bet that those black churches would march.

so where is Rev sharpton and Jessie jackson, aren’t they supposed to be Revs.

Will those so called homo churches now be stopped promoting homosexuality, nah didn’t think so

I was in a place called Quincy MA and there is an old church there with two of our presidents laid to rest but guess what.

homos have took the church over , they fly a rainbow flag on the church and have a banned saying marriage equality

watch these homos and liberals target a church to go to with a video camera.
course they’ll do it to just christian churches and mormon churches but not the Jews or muslims

I can go into any mosque I bet and find that they talk politics all the time , same as a black church

[manc]

then we have to go inside their mosques and record what they say.

[manc]

revolution of secession from the north east?????????????

[George from New England]

We need to stop using the term “Political Correctness.”

Another (correct) name for it is “Cultural Marxism.”

Expected to read: CULTURAL MADNESS

[Unam Sanctam]

Oh great, so now we have to rely on the courts, soon to be packed with Obama appointees, to protect First Amendment freedoms of speech and free exercise and find this legislation unconstitutional. Our constitutional freedoms are vanishing! We are doomed!

[taxesareforever]

All it takes is one activist judge to instill his opinion into this legislation to make it pertain to a Pastor’s sermons. You need to open your eyes. The real world is passing you by.

[Semper Mark]

What a tagline, lol...possibly the best I've seen yet.

[clee1]

Glad you like it, FRiend. I’m here all week; try the veal; tip your waitress.

[aNYCguy]

I guess you still haven’t read the proposed legislation. That’s okay, don’t let it stop you from making predictions about its consequences.

[lowbridge]

"Passage of this law might very well outlaw the koran in the US, due to the call to kill Jews..."

Thats not going to happen. This law will be applied one way: against Christians. The Koran wont be touched. The bible will get banned.

[taxesareforever]

Don’t worry. I won’t. Some people just have a problem getting their heads out of the clouds and facing reality.

[steveyp]

Arm up!

[fwdude]

Nobody should fall for this ambush. Rights that can be "given" by a court or lawmaking body can just as easily be stripped away. How dare they "let" us practice our Christianity!

I prefer the permanent religious exemption found in the U.S. Constitution.

[fwdude]

It’s just a taxpayer money-suck to give federal assistance to local investigations of hate crimes.

I HAVE read the bill. It's insidious incrementalism with an eye on ultimately silencing those would disagree with the full Marxist philosophy. The leftists couldn't be happier about this passing.

[fwdude]

...does the black church know this along with Latino churches because I bet that those black churches would march.

Yes, I'm sure they do or will. But they'll still keep voting democratic - count on it - blindly and loyally. Even while they're being thrown into the ovens.

[Lorica]

It's insidious incrementalism with an eye on ultimately silencing those would disagree with the full Marxist philosophy.

Here's an example of such incrementalism:

Pro-Life Pastor Convicted of Helping Women Avoid Abortions Released From Jail

[prairiebreeze]

mark

[aNYCguy]

It's insidious incrementalism with an eye on ultimately silencing those would disagree with the full Marxist philosophy.

Go ahead and cite the passage which allows prosecution of anti-homosexual pastors for hate crimes.

Hint: It's not there.

[fwdude]

Go ahead and cite the passage which allows prosecution of anti-homosexual pastors for hate crimes.

Hint: It's not there.

This is the reply of a stupid liberal. Please look up the word "incremental" and all its permutations in a reliable dictionary before you reply with an asinine accusation.

Then try pulling your head out of the sand for a little while.

[taxesareforever]

Face it, you are clueless.

Show me where there is a right in the Constitution for abortion or sodomy. And please, don’t cite SCOTUS activist judges for their explanations, for these judges are what my point is all about.