[SampleMan]

You misrepresented my argument to make it easier to attack it. Call it what you like. But however you decide to refer to that strategy, I'm not interested in participating in it.

Call it what I like?? Words have meanings. Check out a dictionary if you don't believe me. As for misrepresenting your arguments, I did no such thing. I introduced a relevant and current analogy. I guess it made you uncomfortable with your argument, so you chose to dismiss it.

Facts are stubborn things. I suggest that you actually check out the history instead of the NYT version. You will be astonished to find that what you think you know is actually a myth created by the left to cover their own involvement in Soviet overtures.

[mysterio]

Because I am against zealots and government witch hunts, you concluded that I am not concerned with organized, well funded foreign campaigns to overthrow the American government. Actually, you didn't conclude that. You found that an easy position to attack, so you pretended that it was my position. I find that tedious, so I opted out.

Facts are stubborn things. I suggest that you actually check out the history instead of the NYT version.

I suggest you call Shirley Temple in front of a congressional committee and make sure she's not a communist. And then tell me that's not government overreaching.