Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A little air pollution boosts vegetationís carbon uptake
Science News ^ | April 22nd, 2009 | Sid Perkins

Posted on 04/27/2009 12:19:33 AM PDT by neverdem

Aerosols bumped up world’s plant productivity by 25 percent in the 1960s and 1970s, new research suggests

The world’s vegetation soaked up carbon dioxide more efficiently under the polluted skies of recent decades than it would have under a pristine atmosphere, a new analysis in the April 23 Nature suggests. The trend hints that relying on forests and other vegetation to sequester carbon may not be effective if skies continue to clear, researchers say.

Major volcanic eruptions throw large quantities of aerosols, such as small bits of fractured rock and droplets of sulfuric acid, high into the atmosphere. Those particles scatter incoming solar radiation, preventing some of it from reaching Earth’s surface and thereby cooling climate temporarily (SN: 11/5/05, p. 294).

That scattering also, however, boosts how much carbon vegetation takes in, says Lina M. Mercado, an ecosystem modeler at the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in Wallingford, England. Although aerosols, including many types of air pollution, decrease the overall amount of light falling onto a tree, the particles diffuse the radiation that reaches the ground so that it actually illuminates more leaves. In that case, leaves below the tree’s outer canopy are less likely to be shaded.

To estimate the way pollution and other aerosols affect the rate at which the world’s plants take up carbon, Mercado and her colleagues adjusted an ecosystem model to include...

--snip--

“It takes a long time for such effects to make their way into climate models,” agrees Michael Roderick, an environmental physicist at the Australian National University in Canberra. “This is a big advance.” Researchers, he notes, could use the revised model to estimate the long-term effects of geoengineering — of which artificially adding large quantities of aerosols to the atmosphere to ameliorate the effects of global warming would be one example.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencenews.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; Testing
KEYWORDS: aerosols; airpollution; carboncult; geoengineering; globalwarming
Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink

Geoengineering might give us the next Ice Age.

1 posted on 04/27/2009 12:19:33 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

That frosts me!


2 posted on 04/27/2009 12:26:14 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"That scattering also, however, boosts how much carbon vegetation takes in, says Lina M. Mercado, an ecosystem modeler at the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in Wallingford, England. Although aerosols, including many types of air pollution, decrease the overall amount of light falling onto a tree, the particles diffuse the radiation that reaches the ground so that it actually illuminates more leaves. In that case, leaves below the tree’s outer canopy are less likely to be shaded." Bring back the open air coal boilers, that will help cool the enviroment. Clean Air was the cause of Global Warming!
3 posted on 04/27/2009 2:25:49 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ...
“It takes a long time for such effects to make their way into climate models,” agrees Michael Roderick, an environmental physicist

Another example of the never-ending need for tweaking of the woefully inadequate climate models.

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

4 posted on 04/27/2009 3:39:46 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." - Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is just some liberal genius’s set of suppositions. I won’t believe anything good or bad that is attributed to man’s ability to polute or clean-up.
It is what it is and mother nature’s models are too complex for climatologists.


5 posted on 04/27/2009 4:03:21 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (To stand up for Capitalism is to hope Teleprompter Boy fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
The trend hints that relying on forests and other vegetation to sequester carbon may not be effective if skies continue to clear, researchers say.
Heh... heads they win, tails we lose. Thanks neverdem.
6 posted on 04/27/2009 11:41:13 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I could have told them that certain plants like pollutants. Why do you think California and Florida put oleanders beside the highways?


7 posted on 04/27/2009 3:27:29 PM PDT by Berosus (No more Kennedys, no more Clintons, no more Bushes, no more political dynasties. Deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Berosus

And gardenias. I love those in CA.


8 posted on 04/27/2009 6:42:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson