Skip to comments.
Specter To Switch Parties: (fillibuster-proof majority with Franken)
Washington Post ^
| 4/28/09
| Chris Cillizza
Posted on 04/28/2009 9:29:46 AM PDT by Nachum
Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter will switch his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat and announced today that he will run in 2010 as a Democrat, according to a statement he released this morning.
Specter's decision would give Democrats a 60 seat filibuster proof majority in the Senate assuming Democrat Al Franken is eventually sworn in as the next Senator from Minnesota. (Former Sen. Norm Coleman is appealing Franken's victory in the state Supreme Court.)
(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; parties; specter; supermajority; switch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-141 next last
Crap.
1
posted on
04/28/2009 9:29:47 AM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
Wonder what the dems will give him.
2
posted on
04/28/2009 9:30:21 AM PDT
by
edcoil
(Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for dinner Liberty is a well-armed lamb)
To: Nachum
Spectre, Snowe and Collins usually voted with them anyways
3
posted on
04/28/2009 9:30:52 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(TYRANNY SENTINEL. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com LIBERTY FICTION at libertyfic.proboards.com)
To: Nachum
And so what ... he voted with the progressives on all critical issues anyway. Never forget that part.
4
posted on
04/28/2009 9:31:09 AM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, your surrender your rights.)
To: Nachum
Yeah, look for Collins and Snowe to make the leap also.
5
posted on
04/28/2009 9:31:12 AM PDT
by
umgud
(I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
To: edcoil
I hope he’s as big a pain in the ass to the Dems as he was to the GOP.
To: Nachum
Thanks for nothing, Arlen!
7
posted on
04/28/2009 9:31:41 AM PDT
by
meandog
(There are bad no dogs, only bad owners--the only good bad owner is one mauled by a good bad dog!)
To: Nachum
April 14, 2009
National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn released a letter today offering a full-throated endorsement of Sen. Arlen Specter in his coming primary against former congressman Pat Toomey,
"Article"
8
posted on
04/28/2009 9:32:06 AM PDT
by
11th Commandment
(Proud Member of the DHS radical list since 2008)
To: Nachum
No, no, no!! This is GREAT news for conservatives!! :-)
2010 is just around the corner. Big changes will be coming as liberal extremists like Arlen Specter will get voted out of congress!! The bottom line is that everyone has a wallet, and all this taxing and spending will be in full force come election time! Kiss most of the dems in congress goodbye then!
9
posted on
04/28/2009 9:32:09 AM PDT
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
To: Nachum
10
posted on
04/28/2009 9:32:14 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
(Obama: Chains you can believe in!)
To: edcoil
11
posted on
04/28/2009 9:33:00 AM PDT
by
henkster
(0bamanomics: "I'll loan you all the money you need to get out of debt.")
To: Tarpon
I’m not too concerned about it. The democrats already had a fillibuster proof majority with Specter on “our” side.
12
posted on
04/28/2009 9:33:04 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: umgud
All three of them (Snowe, Collins and Specter) have no conservative values anyway. If they were honest, they never would have run as Republicans to begin with. Dishonesty abounds in Washington from the president on down.
13
posted on
04/28/2009 9:33:07 AM PDT
by
azlinda
(Welcome to the continuing Demoncrat pity party.)
To: meandog
Is his switching parties allowed under Scottish rules?
(I think we know the answer from Scottish history).
14
posted on
04/28/2009 9:33:32 AM PDT
by
hoosierham
(Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
To: Nachum
Didn't make any difference: the Dems were willing to prostitute the "reconciliation" procedures to pass legislation with a simple majority, and as far as confirmations go, the stinking RINOs in the Senate have a habit of rolling over anyway.
We made this situation inevitable as long as we tolerated Bush's "big government" pseudo-conservatism and the Republicans' K-Street corruption racket.
15
posted on
04/28/2009 9:33:48 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
("Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
To: Nachum
They already have it with Arlen, Collins and Snowe.
To: Nachum
Crap?? - this is great! We get rid of a RINO and send him as a DINO into the enemy camp. This now ‘cleanses’ the way for more conservatives. I hope McCain goes too!
To: Nachum
Slime is as slime does.
Spector is not official slime - instead of RINO slime.
To: azlinda
19
posted on
04/28/2009 9:34:11 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Nachum
20
posted on
04/28/2009 9:34:13 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
( I miss Ronald Reagan!)
To: meandog
He saw that he was far behind Toomey, and made a deal with Obama and Fast Eddie. This is a smart thing to do from his point of view. He’d have had far more credibility had he’d stayed indie like Lieberman. Now he just looks like he ‘s trying to save his ass.
Oh well, at least he help get Alito and Roberts through. Give him that much.
Best,
Chris
21
posted on
04/28/2009 9:34:24 AM PDT
by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
To: umgud
And then we can have real elections ... Have you noticed how the progressives straddle the aisle. Won't be long now, before we wonder where the Constitution went, and how we let it slip away.
It's time to out them for what they are, progressives who want to destroy the Constitution. Most Americans do not live their lives the way the progressives want them to, and don't intend to change.
22
posted on
04/28/2009 9:34:35 AM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, your surrender your rights.)
To: Da Coyote
Oops, that’s “now”, not “not”.
I hate it when I do that.
To: Nachum
April 14, 2009
National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn released a letter today offering a full-throated endorsement of Sen. Arlen Specter in his coming primary against former congressman Pat Toomey,
"Article"
24
posted on
04/28/2009 9:34:45 AM PDT
by
11th Commandment
(Proud Member of the DHS radical list since 2008)
To: edcoil
Wonder what the dems will give him.
Considering his "service" to the Dems, I'd say a pat on the head, and they won't have to do anything but reach down.
25
posted on
04/28/2009 9:34:49 AM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
To: Nachum
So, I apologize for my ignorance, but does that occur TODAY, or do we wait until 2010?
Seems kind of shady a man can run as a (R) and then change midstream and serve as a (D)....<>Oh wait, I guess he was doing that already....Hmmmm
26
posted on
04/28/2009 9:35:05 AM PDT
by
China Clipper
(My favorite animals usually are found next to the rice on my plate.)
To: Nachum
And how much money did the G.O.P. give to this bastard to help him get re-elected?
Not to mention G.W. Bush helping to get his sorry butt re-elected, nice going G.W., not that we needed another REAL republican.
To: Nachum
|
It appears the Democracy approach is a squandering of time and effort.
|
|
|
To: cripplecreek
Specter, Snowe, Collins and McCain.
Specter is all about Specter ... And getting re-elected.
29
posted on
04/28/2009 9:35:38 AM PDT
by
Tarpon
(You abolish your responsibilities, your surrender your rights.)
To: edcoil
Good ridden take Snowe and Collins.
30
posted on
04/28/2009 9:35:41 AM PDT
by
boomop1
To: Nachum
Nothing is filibuster proof. Truth is not all democrats feel thrilled about what us going on in the country. No guarantee that Arlen will even be around next time. He knew he would lose to Toomey so he is trying to find a place to hide. Won’t work with those who supported him the first time. Won’t work with the lefties who didn’t support him last time
To: cripplecreek
Im not too concerned about it. The democrats already had a fillibuster proof majority with Specter on our side.
Whether the Dems have a filibuster-proof majority or not doesn't matter. Does anybody believe that the Republicans in the Senate would ever have had the motivation or the guts actually to employ a real filibuster? The answer isn't no, it's HELL no.
32
posted on
04/28/2009 9:35:53 AM PDT
by
fr_freak
To: Nachum
EVERYTHING IS NOW OFFICIALLY THE DEMOCRATS' FAULT! YIPPEE!
33
posted on
04/28/2009 9:35:59 AM PDT
by
bolobaby
To: Nachum
Et tu, Sphincter?
Useless traitor and backstabber
To: Nachum
It’s irrelevant. He’s not switching parties since we only have a one socialist Republicrat party system.
35
posted on
04/28/2009 9:36:08 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: edcoil
36
posted on
04/28/2009 9:36:10 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: Nachum
Less abilty for Dems to say they have "bipartisan support". Heck, give 'em all the RINOs and be done with it!
Look, the writing was on the wall, Spector was going to get creamed in the primary and he took easy way out.
37
posted on
04/28/2009 9:36:16 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
(Obama: Chains you can believe in!)
To: Nachum
At least his . . .
STINKY PEDIGREE will now be overtly evident in more ways than usual . . . with the more accurate label.
38
posted on
04/28/2009 9:36:16 AM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Nachum
It just goes to show you it is all about them. These politicians stand for little more than reelection. Shame on Pa for electing this bum in the first place and shame on the GOP for standing up for him against principle.
39
posted on
04/28/2009 9:36:30 AM PDT
by
mort56
(He who would sacrifice freedom for security deserves neither. - Ben Franklin)
To: hoosierham
Is his switching parties allowed under Scottish rules? LOL! Like Robert the Bruce in the movie Braveheart.
To: pillut48
I sure hope so. As it stands now, 1/2 of our country has no representation at all.
41
posted on
04/28/2009 9:36:41 AM PDT
by
RC2
(FREEDOM)
To: pillut48
Curb your enthusiasm. A filibuster-proof Senate working with Obama will be able to do a great deal of damage to the Republic before the new Congress is seated in 2011. It is waaay too early to celebrate. Specter has always been a worm, and the biggest mistake Bush made was making sure he got re-elected the last time. This sucks for several different reasons.
42
posted on
04/28/2009 9:36:51 AM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: Nachum
At least he made it official ... we all knew long time ago.
43
posted on
04/28/2009 9:37:11 AM PDT
by
zeaal
To: Nachum
The vast bulk of the Senate has been sold down the treasonous river for decades.
SpectRE was a place holder on the pretend opposition side.
44
posted on
04/28/2009 9:37:18 AM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Nachum
What does Specter expect to get from being a Democrat? It's not like Leahy will move aside and give up his Judiciary Committee Chairmanship.
Will Republicans remove Specter from his committee assignments? Do Democrats have enough slots to keep Specter on the committees he's currently on now?
-PJ
45
posted on
04/28/2009 9:37:26 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(This just in... Voting Republican is a Terrorist act!)
To: Nachum
Spector knew he would lose in the primary. This is all about HIM, screw the rest of the country. Good riddance! Count me in for a contribution to his opponent.
46
posted on
04/28/2009 9:37:42 AM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: Nachum
What took you so long, Judas?
47
posted on
04/28/2009 9:38:07 AM PDT
by
Lurking in Kansas
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: zeaal
Great news! Remove the cancer grow the party...
48
posted on
04/28/2009 9:38:16 AM PDT
by
Dansong
To: Nachum
Crap. Describes Specter to a T.
49
posted on
04/28/2009 9:38:22 AM PDT
by
Turret Gunner A20
(Socialism is a good idea until you run out of other peoples money. Margaret Thatcher)
To: Nachum
More than anything, I think this represents the notion that he probably was going to lose in the GOP primaries.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-141 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson