Posted on 04/28/2009 8:49:37 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Heh, I just had to click on this thread to make sure it was about California.
And, of course, it was.
I agree with you completely.
The sodomites want to make sure there is an ample supply of fresh young meat down the road. This is why they start the propaganda in kindergarden. You'll notice that the people who push this kind of perversion on kindergardners are the same people who are also pushing for universal PRE-kindergarden. They can't start them young enough.
FRegards,
LH
Excellent!
get them desensitized to it as young as possible, put ideas into their minds so the ones that are shy, or don’t fit in with their peers, start planting seeds that these traits may be because THEY might be gay.
Because all human behavior is related in some way to genes, we can nonetheless guess that one day higher quality research will find genetic factors that correlate to homosexuality. But remember, one of the fundamental principles of research is that correlation does not necessarily imply causation.
Those who push the homosexual agenda refuse to understand how little the implications of the text in bold really are.
To better understand the science, the growing ex-gay population must be included to form an educated opinion. The ex-gay stories of Michael Glatz and Charlene Cothran, who both ran their own gay magazines, are two well-known ex-gays that help to throw more doubt on the born that way theory.
we need to outlaw public schools
people will have no say in it. willing or not.
I’ll second that!
A.A.C.
Private schools or home school only!!!!
It is harsh but I think it’s appropriate. I can see only the most malicious reasons behind teaching five year olds about sex. I don’t see any way to teach about homosexuality without explaining sex in some way either.
This kind of calculated brainwashing is identical to communist brainwashing and just as diabolical.
If I remember correctly the people of California didn’t have a choice.
Approx. 5 years ago a gay/lesbian group got caught circumventing parental notification rules when they planned, and pulled off, a little soiree at an elementary school in the Sacramento area. Several parents voiced their anger so the queers proceeded directly to the 9th Circuit Court to get a ruling that “parents don’t have a right or need to know what’s going on in the schools. Parental rights stop at the school house door.”
That’s my recollection anyway. I might have the location wrong. I was thinking it was a Rocklin elementary school but I did an internet search for the article a few days ago and was unable to find it.
You state a great point about the age appropriateness. There’s no need to teach 5 yr olds about sex. Other than mommy is pregnant with a baby, made by love between mommy and daddy and God. Anything else just goes right over their head anyway.
Kindergarteners don’t need to know about any sex, and that includes homo sex. 3rd graders don’t need to know either.
As they get older, yeah maybe but I don’t think it’s the school’s responsibility. It’s the parents’. Now, our Catholic k-8 teaches sex ed in 5th grade. I’m ok with it. I learned about it in religion class too back, way way back, when I was in 7th grade, Catholic school, in Religion class. But it’s not their responsibility either, imo, outside what the Church teaches. I’m candid with my kids. They ask, I answer.
It was probably around 4th or 5th grade when my kids asked about homosexuality. More so with the two younger ones since they’re exposed to more than the two older ones were. Anyway, it’s up to parents imo. Parents generally know best.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.