Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mojito

Considering how many Americans would have been killed in an invasion of Japan, NOT using the Atom Bomb would have been a war crime. We killed more Japanese with firebombing than with the atom bomb, but Stewart probably hasn’t read enough history to even be aware of it.


38 posted on 04/30/2009 1:43:52 PM PDT by yazoo (was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yazoo
We killed more Japanese with firebombing than with the atom bomb, but Stewart probably hasn’t read enough history to even be aware of it.

The atom bomb in the end saved even more Japanese lives than American lives, according to the estimates of casualties from a land invasion of Japan.

39 posted on 04/30/2009 1:44:55 PM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: yazoo
If you live in rice paper houses, don't throw firebombs.

The Japanese sowed the wind with their little fire balloon stunt trying to light California on fire. They reaped the FIRESTORM a couple years later.

If you live in rice paper houses, don't throw firebombs.

Tokyo went up like a MATCH. Waves of flames looked like the surface of the Sun. Far more died in that than in Atomic fire. But nobody cares, it is the morality of using the ultimate weapon that weighs on their conscience, not how many lives were lost or how many were saved.

52 posted on 04/30/2009 2:03:35 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson