Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 most conservative Supreme Court Justices
San Antonio Express-News ^ | 04/30/2009

Posted on 05/01/2009 11:49:23 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: bone52
Scalia didn’t go to the promised land with his concurrence, but he took a big step in that direction in that he tied the doctrine back to the Constitution instead of leaving it hanging unattached.

As near as I can tell all that does is let them keep right on using the commerce clause to destroy the boundaries between the state and local govenments while arguing they're actually complying with the original intent of power while doing it.

21 posted on 05/02/2009 4:31:32 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bone52
On the other hand the majority relies on the fact that the limits of the commerce clause are defined by precedent. With this view the Court cannot get close to what Justice Story stated and what the original intent was.

Even this seems to pay lip service to that idea by only going back to 1937.

22 posted on 05/02/2009 4:40:25 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson