Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Looks To Protect Lawmakers From Investigations
Stop The ACLU ^ | May 4, 2009

Posted on 05/04/2009 8:40:25 AM PDT by jazusamo

The most ethical Congress ever. Draining the swamp. Doing away with the culture of corruption. Insert whatever Pelosi talking point you want, Nancy appears to want to insulate federal lawmakers from being investigated

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is working to buffer lawmakers from federal investigators. This is a bad idea. Special legal protections for politicians encourage unethical conduct.

Irvin B. Nathan, general counsel of the House of Representatives, sent a letter to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Monday about establishing a protocol on how to handle “hopefully rare searches and electronic surveillance involving members of Congress.” Mr. Nathan previously failed to negotiate such an agreement with the George W. Bush administration when Republicans controlled the House. His return to this effort isn’t surprising given the number of congressional Democrats facing accusations of ethical misconduct.

Democrats facing scrutiny include the chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, John P. Murtha of Pennsylvania, for his close ties to the defense lobby firm PMA Group, which is under federal investigation; House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New York about a number of tax issues; Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr. of Illinois over his reported effort to persuade ousted Illinois Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich to appoint him to fill President Obama’s former Senate seat; and Rep. Jane Harman of California, who reportedly was taped in 2005 by the National Security Agency purportedly agreeing to help seek leniency for two accused Israeli spies in exchange for help in lobbying her appointment to chair the House Intelligence Committee.

Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, on Thursday invoked the separation of powers as justification for the move. Mrs. Pelosi, who has acknowledged being aware previously of Mrs. Harman’s controversial dialogue, claims the stance is a matter of principle. “Whether it’s invading an office or wiretapping a conversation, it’s important for us to have the separation of powers and the respect for individual liberties, again, while not harboring information that would be useful under the speech [or] debate clause,” she said.

Imagine this was, say, 2005, and J. Dennis Hastert pulled this rabbit out of the hat. Can you imagine the uproar from the media, both old and new? Now flash-forward to 2009, and try and even find the story at all the usual suspects. Pelosi is attempting to make sure that Democrats cannot be investigated for legal violations, pure and simple. Period. She forgets that elected representatives are not only not above the law, but that they should be held to higher standards.

Via Gateway Pundit, who also points to Glenn Reynolds: And don’t forget Pete Visclosky, Jim Moran, Allen Mollohan, etc. I know, I know — there are so many it’s hard to keep track!

PS: Who wants to bet that any “protections” will not apply to any Republican who so much as jaywalks?



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2006election; cultureofcorruption; democrats; democratscandals; doublestandard; drainingtheswamp; ethics; hypocrite; murtha; pelosi; pelosicongress; pelosilied; rangel; stalinisttactics

1 posted on 05/04/2009 8:40:25 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Good post


2 posted on 05/04/2009 8:42:21 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama /Pelosi/Bush Theme : "A dollar borrowed or printed is a dollar earned!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I thought these critters weren’t supposed to be “Above the Law” ??


3 posted on 05/04/2009 8:45:26 AM PDT by Rabble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rabble

Special treatment for Special People ??


4 posted on 05/04/2009 8:46:53 AM PDT by Rabble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Nancy appears to want to insulate federal lawmakers from being investigated

Should read: appears to want to insulate DEMOCRAT federal lawmakers.

5 posted on 05/04/2009 8:49:37 AM PDT by Poison Pill (Given enough time, everything becomes illegal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rabble
The phrases Pelosi used over and over over the past four years was “Accountability” and “congressional oversight” and that means democrats put Bush admin under oath over and over to generate embarrassing video clips for the news, It does NOT mean that democrats are to be investigated for anything, “What did Bush know and when did he know it?” is the rally cry. They also say on TV over and over "We just want to get to the truth"

I am scared congressional republicans will refuse to cry foul.

6 posted on 05/04/2009 8:51:55 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama /Pelosi/Bush Theme : "A dollar borrowed or printed is a dollar earned!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill
Should read: appears to want to insulate DEMOCRAT federal lawmakers.

That's EXACTLY how it should read!

7 posted on 05/04/2009 8:52:12 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Tree of liberty... refreshed... blood of patriots and tyrants


8 posted on 05/04/2009 8:54:12 AM PDT by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / MOLWN LABE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

There needs to be a clean sweep in DC starting with this arrogant Speaker of the House.


9 posted on 05/04/2009 8:55:11 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She wants to prohibit the police from looking in Democrat’s freezers.


10 posted on 05/04/2009 8:58:24 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby; ArmyTeach; Badeye; billmor; bmwcyle; brityank; ConorMacNessa; dalight; ...
Looks like Pelosi is pulling out all stops to protect Fat Jack Murtha.

Murtha Watch Ping!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Code Pinkos

To be added to the Murtha Watch ping list please notify myself or RedRover.

11 posted on 05/04/2009 9:01:14 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
"I am scared congressional republicans will refuse to cry foul.

One thing they could argue is that the proposal is unconstitutional.

The 14th amendment states clearly "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

12 posted on 05/04/2009 9:03:57 AM PDT by Rabble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

She wants to protect her own a$$ from prosecution with some of her little deals. Hah, she’s not fooling anyone.


13 posted on 05/04/2009 9:04:59 AM PDT by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Agreed...I’d like to see some skeletons dug out of her closet, there’s some nasty ones there.


14 posted on 05/04/2009 9:13:40 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Jail Pelosi for Obstruction Of Justice.


15 posted on 05/04/2009 9:14:05 AM PDT by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Election 2010 is already under way. Start the ads against Pelosi’s corrupt Congress NOW.


16 posted on 05/04/2009 10:05:33 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (IRONY - we know more about the First Dog's historical papers than we do of President Barack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

bump


17 posted on 05/04/2009 10:12:04 AM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rabble

That whole Magna Carta thing is so 13th Century.


18 posted on 05/04/2009 10:30:05 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (I long for the days when advertisers didn't constantly ask about the health of my genital organs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
So now the KGB I mean FBI can't investigate Politburo members, uh, members of Congress?
19 posted on 05/04/2009 10:43:34 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("The unarmed man is not just defenseless - he is also contemptible." Machiavelli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Soooo would I.


20 posted on 05/04/2009 12:45:54 PM PDT by Marysecretary (.GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson