Skip to comments.Who is watching the Watchmen? [Bush DHS commissioned infamous "right-wing extremism" report]
Posted on 05/05/2009 9:19:37 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
April was a cruel month indeed for new Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. The weeks before the Swine Flu outbreak found her stumbling through reporters questions about a DHS threat assessment memo on Rightwing Extremism.
That memo urged law enforcers nationwide to monitor the allegedly gathering danger from Rightist radicals, including pro-lifers, immigration opponents, and those who reject federal authority in favor of state and local authority.
Was this a sinister conspiracy by an administration full of Chard-sipping arugula eaters determined to spy on Red-State patriots? Thats quite unlikely: The memo was commissioned during the Bush administration, as was a similar memo focusing on Leftwing Extremists.
But conservatives were nonetheless right to be concerned. The DHS memo suggests that bureaucratic mission creep can be as dangerous to liberty as a deliberate campaign of repression.
Americas experience with domestic spying in the pre-Watergate period makes that clear. Presidents Johnson and Nixon believed antiwar groups were being funded by the Soviet Union, and pressured the CIA, the FBI, and the military to establish the link.
Federal intelligence operatives assigned to domestic spying programs like COINTELPRO and Operation CHAOS found little evidence of communist subversion.
Yet its the rare bureaucracy that closes up shop for lack of anything useful to do: instead, COINTELPRO and CHAOS agents began keeping files on law-abiding citizens who disagreed with their government.
The U.S. military got into the act as well. The Army kept files on over 100,000 citizens, including such dangerous national security threats as folk singers Arlo Guthrie and Joan Baez.
Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on the program revealed that comments about the financial affairs, sex lives, and psychiatric histories of persons unaffiliated with the armed forces appear throughout the various records systems.
Given the history, its not entirely paranoid for conservatives to wonder if federal observers might lurk among the crowds at future tea parties.
A more recent example of mission creeps dangers can be seen in the Pentagons TALON program. TALON, short for Threat and Local Observation Notice, encouraged military personnel and civilian DoD employees to file reports on suspicious activities, which could then be sent on to law enforcement. As before, the military quickly began to monitor peaceful protests.
In March 2005, the Armys 902nd Military Intelligence Group warned the Akron, Ohio, police department about an assembly of middle-aged peace activists organized by local Quakers.
Responding to criticism of the Armys Quaker-watching excursion, a Pentagon spokesman declared, The fact that the marches proceeded peacefully is irrelevant to leveling criticisms against the Army in this instance. Hindsight is always 20/20.
Public ridicule led to TALONs end in 2007. But other post-9/11 surveillance efforts continue apace. Yale law professor Jack Balkin warns that fear of terrorism has contributed to the growth of what he calls the National Surveillance State, a regime in which the federal government uses its expanded information gathering capabilities to monitor the citizenry and ward off potential threats.
That in itself presents a threat, Balkin writes, because the more powerful government becomes in knowing what its citizens are doing, the easier it becomes to control peoples behavior.
In the Vietnam era, keeping tabs on dissenters was a low-tech affair. FBI and CIA agents depended on paper files and index cards; they needed to physically open letters and individually review telegrams. Today, with modern processing power and data-mining technology, the possibilities for surveillance are staggering. And so is the potential for abuse.
In March, Rod Beckstrom, the DHS official in charge of cybersecurity, resigned, citing concerns about an information security plan that envisioned a lead role for the NSA, giving the agency a dangerous level of access to civilians web searches and email.
And the week after the Rightwing Extremism memo was revealed, Justice Department officials admitted that the NSA had been engaged in illegal overcollection of Americans domestic communications.
Though some bloggers and radio hosts may have overreacted to the DHS memo, it was heartening to see conservatives finally show concern over possible abuses by the national security bureaucracy.
But their level of outrage shouldnt depend on whose ox is getting goredconstitutional privacy shouldnt be a Red Team/Blue Team issue. As the National Surveillance State grows, the need for new checks and balances has never been greater.
Examiner columnist Gene Healy is a vice president at the Cato Institute and the author of The Cult of the Presidency.
Actually I suspect it goes back to Clinton in its original form.
The report was commissioned under Chertoff, but Napoliano’s people had the final input and final say, as in the footnote about the military, at least, that’s what she admitted.
There you go. Bush’s fault. Move on./s
So the Bush Administration commissioned reports on the terroristic threat of political extremists on both sides of the aisle, but Obama’s team decided that only extremism on the right counted (can you even BE too extremely left with this crowd?) and they decided that being pro-life, anti-tax, pro 10th amendment or even a veteran all qualified an individual as dangerously extreme rightwing potential terrorist.
Validation, for those who needed it. LOL!
The commission of a report and the outcome are two separate processes. What is the original requirements document and SOW? Specifically?
If this was true, why would Napolitano and the administration not announce this??? Don’t waste a “crisis” and all that tripe.....
The outcome of course. Changes and additions/deletions. Editing and approval of content.
The very first page of husseins report says that since the economic collapse and the election of the first black President, the threat matrix has changed and the report is amended to reflect those changes... so this leftist tripe is bovine poop.
Not to mention that a March ‘09 DHS report which listed ‘black separatists’ as extremists was immediately revoked by the agency—
Result: Only veterans, second amendment supporters and pro-lifers are extremist-—NOT black separatists.
Excellent observation. Some people cannot stop blaming President Bush, the BDS is strong with them.
Who commissioned it is irrelevant. Who wrote is isn’t. Who published it, and why, is extremely relevant. And that puts the buck right back on Napolitano’s desk.
“The DHS memo suggests that bureaucratic mission creep can be as dangerous to liberty as a deliberate campaign of repression.”
Yes I believe it originated in 1997. Or so I have heard.
Apologies for having jumped all over your post. I am disgusted with the media & administration altogether. Reports, EOs, legislation, etc., can be done at the last minute, since many of them are in various stages of development. Ditto for the corporate world. Things are pulled out of the hat or off the shelf on command.
True enough!!! Good catch!
They were right. That has been proven from the KGB files.
Why do I have the feeling that Janet Napolitano's never heard of a "leftwing" extremist that she took seriously? She would have the wit to know that even if there were "leftwing" radicals - it wouldn't paint all dems as being like them. OH NO - she wouldn't profile her OWN group. But with us? She paints with the widest brush known to man.