Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: balls

I just wanted to point out the following...

If Evolution was indeed “settled science” then it would no longer be officially called the THEORY of Evolution, and would instead be official considered the LAW of Evolution.

I don’t want to argue about which belief is correct either, but isn’t the above a pretty basic fact of science regarding the naming thing? A theory has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and when it is, it is said to be a LAW. [For instance Newton had a THEORY of Gravity, long before it became Newton’s LAW of Gravity.]


52 posted on 05/06/2009 10:09:55 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: LibertyRocks

You are correct, of course. I misspoke. Evolution is still a theory.


66 posted on 05/07/2009 7:18:17 AM PDT by balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks
If Evolution was indeed “settled science” then it would no longer be officially called the THEORY of Evolution, and would instead be official considered the LAW of Evolution.

It's as unsettled as all those other tenuous theories, like the Theory of Gravity, the Theory of Special Relativity, the Theory of General Relativity, the Theory of Quantum Mechanics, the Theory of Atoms and the Theory of Electromagnetism.

In other words, it makes testable, verifiable, repeatable predictions about what we see and will see in the physical sciences. Unlike, for example, so-called Creation Science.
117 posted on 05/08/2009 8:34:27 PM PDT by Phileleutherus Franciscus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson