OK, my definition of “cross-species” evolution would be “the propensity over time for one species to develop into multiple species”, such as single-cellular life developing into more complex organisms, which in turn, branch out into other organisms.
Rush did not use the expletive, but the abbreviation, as I quoted. He stated that he didn't believe that “cross-species evolution” has ever been proved, and said the the missing link story was “really all BS”. What he means by the term “cse” remains undefined, as far as I know. He said this on either Tuesday or Wednesday in the second or third hour. No “false witness” on my end. Cordially, Bob
So the bears on Noah's ark didn't posses a propensity over time to become all the different species of bears?
Those that think all modern species descended from those primordial “kinds” that Noah had on the Ark believe in “cross species evolution” with a power and speed unsupportable by experimental evidence.
Nothing Rush has ever said, or that you can produce, would lead one to believe he thinks the world is only a few thousand years old or that dinosaurs lived alongside humanity.
If you have evidence to the contrary please produce it, otherwise we must go with what words he has actually said, the words which you originally tried to twist into some semblance of your own belief; but which actually say quite simply that Rush accepts the theory of evolution, thus diminishing the journalist’s point that Republicans are not wholesale rejectors of science.
posted on 05/26/2009 7:46:40 AM PDT
("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson