Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat
A taking under eminent domain has to be for the good of the population.
Concur

They were numerous cases of stupid individuals thinking the law applied to them.
You claimed the state was stealing property, not individuals. If the state opens up public right of way for everyone via eminent domain how is that stealing? (as long as the deed owner is justly compensated)

17 posted on 05/07/2009 8:30:19 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (Barack Benito Obama heads the most shocking "end justifies the means" gang of thugs/ administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: TeleStraightShooter
You claimed the state was stealing property, not individuals. If the state opens up public right of way for everyone via eminent domain how is that stealing?

That is not what was happening!! The counties were cutting fences and grading roads where no one had been in fifty years claiming it was a legit right of way. Current rules say they need to prove it had been in continuous usage for a period of ten years prior to the grading, other wise there was no road and no right of way. And that is also what the court says.

And A public good is not a trail riding road for 4 wheeler hobbyists.

18 posted on 05/07/2009 1:23:54 PM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson