Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Networks Likely To Turn Down Obama Primetime Request
imdb.com ^ | May 8, 2009

Posted on 05/09/2009 1:33:20 AM PDT by paudio

After losing some $30 million from advertisers while they covered President Obama's three primetime news conferences in recent months, the major television networks are likely to follow Fox's lead and turn down the White House when it asks them to preempt a primetime time period any time soon, the Hollywood Reporter reported today (Friday), citing several unnamed network executives. "We will continue to make our decisions on White House requests on a case-by-case basis, but the Fox decision gives us cover to reject a request if we feel that there is no urgent breaking news that is going to be discussed," one network exec told the trade publication.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: bho44; foxtv; msm; networks; obama; second100days; television; tpd; tv
Yeah, at one point, they realize how stupid they are to basically subsidizing 0bama all the time when they don't get much from him.

The paragraph is from imdb, and there's nothing more there.

1 posted on 05/09/2009 1:33:20 AM PDT by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: paudio

I suppose he’s going to “bail” them out for this and then impose his will and force them to put his face 24-7, mafya knee breaker loan shark style.


2 posted on 05/09/2009 1:37:59 AM PDT by JudgemAll (control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
He's very dependent on the goodwill adoration of the networks. I don't know if he realizes this, though.
3 posted on 05/09/2009 1:40:18 AM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

Reminds me of Fidel Castro and Chavez.


4 posted on 05/09/2009 1:41:24 AM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paudio
"Networks Likely To Turn Down Obama Primetime Request"

I wouldn't bet on it. They've sold their souls to Ø, and he's not about to give them back. He owns them.

5 posted on 05/09/2009 1:50:01 AM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

What a bunch of cowards using FOX to protect themselves from the tyrant BO.


6 posted on 05/09/2009 1:52:01 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
"Reminds me of Fidel Castro and Chavez."

They're amateurs compared to this guy. For them tyranny is just a diversion. For Ø, it's his passion, his raison d'etre.

7 posted on 05/09/2009 1:52:04 AM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
Soon the recalcitrant Pubbies will be the least of Obie's concerns. Battle lines are being drawn by Dems who ran as Conservative Dems and who want to be reelected along with the MSM. It will be interesting to see how the Pontificator in Chief handles this two from war.
8 posted on 05/09/2009 1:52:24 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Barak Obama: Pontificator in Chief and Poster Child for the Peter Principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

What we see is not much different from many dictators in the 3rd world countries. Sometimes we forget that many—if not most—of them also came to power through election. Not unlike in those countries, in today’s America it is common that we go to bookstores, T-shirt stores, and other places and see the picture of Our Great Leader there.


9 posted on 05/09/2009 1:54:28 AM PDT by paudio (Conservatism is a word with various meanings. To win, we need unified issue and message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
Oops

two front war!!!

10 posted on 05/09/2009 1:56:56 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Barak Obama: Pontificator in Chief and Poster Child for the Peter Principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paudio

BO going for total saturation. Unfortunately, America isn’t completely made up of sponges, although, there are a few.


11 posted on 05/09/2009 1:58:17 AM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

IMHO the key phrase of the article is:

“the Fox decision gives us cover”

This sums up the MSM’s approach to everything - pact mentality at its worse.The big name reporters of the past going all the way back to Poor Richard’s Almanac must be spinning in their graves.


12 posted on 05/09/2009 3:09:57 AM PDT by Nip (Islam - a religion of piece (your head and life). Truth depends on the spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Obama is on TV almost everyday now. He never has anyhting new to say, so I just change the channel or go do something else. I wonder if these White House PR guys ever heard of “over saturation”.


13 posted on 05/09/2009 3:21:14 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Bull crap. They are Hussein worshipers through and through. They’ll bow their knees before him and obey.


14 posted on 05/09/2009 3:27:55 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm SO glad I no longer belong to the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl
You're right, but tyranny is too sophisticated a word.

They're in it for personal aggrandizement and the power high.

They love to reach out and make something happen. Cook County Dems are the Emperors of Control.

Control freak is just too tame a word.

15 posted on 05/09/2009 4:18:44 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: paudio

OBAMA: BAD FOR PROFITS


16 posted on 05/09/2009 5:01:04 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

“They love to reach out and make something happen”

And here in lies the problem. Change for change sake is never a good thing unless you know what you’re doing. If you don’t you may change things in ways no one could ever imagine. Sometimes the best course of action is to do nothing, which is something that “progressives” never understood.


17 posted on 05/09/2009 5:44:23 AM PDT by RU88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Networks take a big hit when they pre-empt their normal schedule like this. Not only are they losing the ad revenue as the article states, but they're losing one important thing that provides "brand/product differentiation" for them compared to other media outlets: their prime-time programs.
18 posted on 05/09/2009 6:23:40 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

He’s fired CEO’s and nationalized our auto industry. Think that he will let a few media bigwigs stand in his way?


19 posted on 05/09/2009 6:27:05 AM PDT by listenhillary (Rahm Emmanuel slip - A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
He is on TV almost everyday now. Have they made a horizontal bobble-head of him yet?
20 posted on 05/09/2009 7:01:43 AM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet

Perhaps he should fund his own cable channel. He could call it a “jobs program.”


21 posted on 05/09/2009 7:05:07 AM PDT by ShandaLear (I LOVE RUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: paudio
How long before this Democrat Congress and Democrat Administration get the bright idea to start appropriating public money to buy the same air time for these important and necessary "public" national leadership events on network TV?

After all, this is chump change to them and it's all a part of "serving the people" and keeping them properly informed, is it not?

22 posted on 05/09/2009 7:14:33 AM PDT by Gritty (The world has concluded Obama is nourished by applause for his perpetual candidacy-VD Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RU88
Absolutely. Hence my tag-line. Sometimes doing nothing at all is the best course of action.

For government, it is just about always true.

Katrina is the best example. An instilled welfare attitude trapped those people into not even trying to help themselves.

Just read a fascinating article on survival - survivors take personal responsibility. Duh.

23 posted on 05/09/2009 7:47:22 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Dear networks. So you think you are tough enough to turn your master away? What part of THIS don't you pansies understand:

"Who the f*** do you think you're dealing with? We'll have the IRS audit your fund. Every one of your employees. Your investors. Then we will have the Securities and Exchange Commission rip through your books looking for anything and everything and nothing we find to destroy you with."

24 posted on 05/09/2009 8:29:10 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
"We will continue to make our decisions on White House requests on a case-by-case basis, but the Fox decision gives us cover to reject a request if we feel that there is no urgent breaking news that is going to be discussed," one network exec told the trade publication."

You people at the networks don't quite understand do you? First, it is never a request from Obama, it is a demand. Second, it doesn't matter if YOU lose money, it only matters that the messiah gets on prime time at a time of his convenience. So as the great Pamela Lee said - "Suck it."

25 posted on 05/09/2009 8:32:57 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
The media will have to adjust to the new world soon.

In the past, as long as Republicans were a factor in politics, the media and their opinions, and their profits, mattered. Democrats welcomed them with open arms and made them believe that their input was highly valued. For now though, they don't really matter. Obama and the Rats have total control over everything except the Supreme Court, and that will change soon enough. The media is of no further use to the Democrats. Too bad, how sad.

(I hate to do this, but here goes. Hey media, if you want to be considered a "playah" once more, get more Republicans elected so that political balance is restored. Then, the Democrats will respect you in the morning again.)

26 posted on 05/09/2009 8:39:26 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
"Think that he will let a few media bigwigs stand in his way?"

IMO - no. But for the sake of speculation, I wonder how Obama would handle it if the news print media and the broadcast media got so ticked off that 24/7, they began running full scale investigations into the administration scandals, and began demanding special prosecutors?

27 posted on 05/09/2009 8:45:14 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Yes, their tsunami is a combination of rampant liberalism (caused by self-selection) and rapid technological change, that they perceived as a mouse v. dinosaur situation (too late to notice the mice eating their eggs).

I think the new media will be interesting in that I've never been to DU. Will this create a new institutional bias?

During the Nixon years the favorite conspirator's phrase was, “do you have the correct information?”

Isn't that the direction we are headed with liberals having their “facts” and we ours?

28 posted on 05/09/2009 8:52:11 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
During the Nixon years the favorite conspirator's phrase was, “do you have the correct information?”

Isn't that the direction we are headed with liberals having their “facts” and we ours?"

I think we are back in the Clinton era. Truth and facts don't matter unless the media investigates something and agrees with it.

29 posted on 05/09/2009 9:09:27 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Pretty brave of them. I’ve heard this administration has specialist in kneecaps and legs willing to apply their expertise.


30 posted on 05/09/2009 3:50:23 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson